Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, California, USA.
Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
JACC Heart Fail. 2024 Jul;12(7):1226-1237. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2024.03.006. Epub 2024 May 1.
Three medications are now guideline-recommended treatments for heart failure with mildly reduced or preserved ejection fraction (HFmrEF/HFpEF), however, the cost-effectiveness of these agents in combination has yet to be established.
The purpose of this study was to determine the cost-effectiveness of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRA), angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors (ARNIs), and sodium glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) in individuals with HFmrEF/HFpEF.
Using a 3-state Markov model, we performed a cost-effectiveness study using simulated cohorts of 1,000 patients with HFmrEF and HFpEF. Treatment with 1-, 2-, and 3-drug combinations was modeled. Based on a United States health care sector perspective, outcome data was used to calculate incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) in 2023 United States dollars based on a 30-year time horizon.
Treatment with MRA, MRA+SGLT2i, and MRA+SGLT2i+ARNI therapy resulted in an increase in life years of 1.04, 1.58, and 1.80 in the HFmrEF subgroup, respectively, and 0.99, 1.54, and 1.77 in the HFpEF subgroup, respectively, compared with placebo. At a yearly cost of $18, MRA therapy resulted in ICERs of $10,000 per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) in both subgroups. The ICER for the addition of SGLT2i therapy ($4,962 per year) was $113,000 per QALY in the HFmrEF subgroup and $141,000 in the HFpEF subgroup. The addition of ARNI therapy ($5,504 per year) resulted in ICERs >$250,000 per QALY in both subgroups. If SGLT2i and ARNI were available at generic pricing the ICERs become <$10,000 per QALY in both EF subgroups. Outcomes were highly sensitive to assumed benefit in cardiovascular death.
For patients with heart failure, MRA was of high value, SGLT2i was of intermediate value, and ARNI was of low value in both HFmrEF and HFpEF subgroups. For patients with HFmrEF/HFpEF increased use of MRA and SGLT2i therapies should be encouraged and be accompanied with efforts to lower the cost of SGLT2i and ARNI therapies.
目前有三种药物被指南推荐用于治疗射血分数轻度降低或保留的心力衰竭(HFmrEF/HFpEF),然而,这些药物联合使用的成本效益尚未确定。
本研究旨在确定醛固酮受体拮抗剂(MRA)、血管紧张素受体-脑啡肽酶抑制剂(ARNIs)和钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白 2 抑制剂(SGLT2is)在 HFmrEF/HFpEF 患者中的成本效益。
使用三状态马尔可夫模型,我们对 1000 名 HFmrEF 和 HFpEF 患者的模拟队列进行了成本效益研究。对 1 种、2 种和 3 种药物联合治疗进行了建模。基于美国医疗保健部门的观点,根据 30 年的时间范围,使用结果数据计算增量成本效益比(ICER),以 2023 年的美元为单位。
与安慰剂相比,MRA、MRA+SGLT2i 和 MRA+SGLT2i+ARN 治疗分别使 HFmrEF 亚组的寿命增加了 1.04、1.58 和 1.80 年,HFpEF 亚组的寿命分别增加了 0.99、1.54 和 1.77 年。在每年 18000 美元的成本下,MRA 治疗在两个亚组中的每 QALY 的 ICER 为 10000 美元。在 HFmrEF 亚组中,SGLT2i 治疗的附加成本为每年 4962 美元,每 QALY 的 ICER 为 113000 美元,HFpEF 亚组的 ICER 为 141000 美元。ARN 治疗的附加成本为每年 5504 美元,在两个亚组中,每 QALY 的 ICER 均超过 250000 美元。如果 SGLT2i 和 ARNI 以仿制药价格提供,那么在 EF 两个亚组中,ICER 将低于 10000 美元/QALY。结果对心血管死亡的假设获益非常敏感。
对于心力衰竭患者,MRA 具有较高的价值,SGLT2i 具有中等价值,ARN 具有较低价值,在 HFmrEF 和 HFpEF 亚组中均如此。对于 HFmrEF/HFpEF 患者,应鼓励增加 MRA 和 SGLT2i 治疗的使用,并努力降低 SGLT2i 和 ARNI 治疗的成本。