Heming Meike, Siegrist Johannes, Erschens Rebecca, Genrich Melanie, Hander Nicole R, Junne Florian, Küllenberg Janna K, Müller Andreas, Worringer Britta, Angerer Peter
Institute of Occupational, Social, and Environmental Medicine, Centre for Health and Society, Faculty of Medicine, Heinrich-Heine University Düsseldorf, Moorenstraße 5, 40225, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Institute of Medical Sociology, Centre for Health and Society, Faculty of Medicine, Heinrich-Heine University Düsseldorf, Moorenstraße 5, 40225, Düsseldorf, Germany.
J Occup Med Toxicol. 2023 Jun 6;18(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s12995-023-00376-4.
Hospitals are frequently associated with poor working conditions that can lead to work stress and increase the risk for reduced employee well-being. Managers can shape and improve working conditions and thereby, the health of their teams. Thus, as a prerequisite, managers need to be aware of their employees' stress levels. This study had two objectives: At first, it aimed to test the criterion validity of the Effort-Reward Imbalance (ERI) questionnaire measuring psychosocial workload in hospital employees. Secondly, mean scales of the ERI questionnaire filled in by employees were compared with mean scales of an adapted ERI questionnaire, in which managers assessed working conditions of their employees.
Managers (n = 141) from three hospitals located in Germany assessed working conditions of their employees with an adapted external, other-oriented questionnaire. Employees (n = 197) of the mentioned hospitals completed the short version of the ERI questionnaire to assess their working conditions. Confirmatory factor analyses (CFA) were applied to test factorial validity, using the ERI scales for the two study groups. Criterion validity was assessed with multiple linear regression analysis of associations between ERI scales and well-being among employees.
The questionnaires demonstrated acceptable psychometric properties in terms of internal consistency of scales, although some indices of model fit resulting from CFA were of borderline significance. Concerning the first objective, effort, reward, and the ratio of effort-reward imbalance were significantly associated with well-being of employees. With regard to the second objective, first tentative findings showed that managers' ratings of their employees' effort at work was quite accurate, whereas their reward was overestimated.
With its documented criterion validity the ERI questionnaire can be used as a screening tool of workload among hospital employees. Moreover, in the context of work-related health promotion, managers' perceptions of their employees' workload deserve increased attention as first findings point to some discrepancies between their perceptions and those provided by employees.
医院常常与恶劣的工作条件相关联,这可能导致工作压力,并增加员工幸福感降低的风险。管理者能够塑造并改善工作条件,从而提升其团队的健康状况。因此,作为前提条件,管理者需要了解员工的压力水平。本研究有两个目标:首先,旨在检验用于测量医院员工心理社会工作量的付出-回报失衡(ERI)问卷的效标效度。其次,将员工填写的ERI问卷的平均量表与管理者评估员工工作条件时所使用的经过改编的ERI问卷的平均量表进行比较。
来自德国三家医院的141名管理者使用一份经过改编的、以外部他人为导向的问卷评估员工的工作条件。上述医院的197名员工完成了ERI问卷的简短版本,以评估他们的工作条件。使用两个研究组的ERI量表,通过验证性因素分析(CFA)来检验因素效度。通过对ERI量表与员工幸福感之间的关联进行多重线性回归分析来评估效标效度。
尽管CFA得出的一些模型拟合指数处于临界显著水平,但这些问卷在量表的内部一致性方面表现出可接受的心理测量特性。关于第一个目标,付出、回报以及付出-回报失衡比率与员工幸福感显著相关。关于第二个目标,初步研究结果表明,管理者对员工工作付出的评级相当准确,而对回报的评级则存在高估。
ERI问卷已证明的效标效度使其可作为医院员工工作量的筛查工具。此外,在与工作相关的健康促进背景下,管理者对员工工作量的认知值得更多关注,因为初步研究结果表明他们的认知与员工的认知之间存在一些差异。