Suppr超能文献

开口右冠状动脉支架内再狭窄的机制和治疗结果。

Mechanisms and treatment outcomes of ostial right coronary artery in-stent restenosis.

机构信息

Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.

Clinical Trials Center, Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York, NY, USA.

出版信息

EuroIntervention. 2023 Aug 7;19(5):e383-e393. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-23-00107.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Despite a high rate of in-stent restenosis (ISR) after stenting the right coronary artery (RCA) ostium, the mechanism of ostial RCA ISR is not well understood.

AIMS

We aimed to clarify the cause of ostial RCA ISR using intravascular ultrasound (IVUS).

METHODS

Overall, 139 ostial RCA ISR lesions were identified with IVUS, pre-revascularisation. Primary ISR mechanisms were classified as follows: 1) neointimal hyperplasia (NIH); 2) neoatherosclerosis; 3) ostium not covered by the stent; 4) stent fracture or deformation; 5) stent underexpansion (old minimum stent area <4.0 mm or stent expansion <50%); or 6) a protruding calcified nodule.

RESULTS

The median duration from prior stenting was 1.2 (first quartile 0.6, third quartile 3.1) years. The primary mechanisms of ISR were NIH in 25% (n=35) of lesions, neoatherosclerosis in 22% (n=30), uncovered ostium in 6% (n=9) (biological cause 53%, n=74), stent fracture or deformation in 25% (n=35), underexpansion in 11% (n=15), and protruding calcified nodules in 11% (n=15) (mechanical cause 47%, n=65). Including secondary mechanisms, 51% (n=71) of ostial RCA ISRs had stent fractures that were associated with greater hinge motion of the ostial-aorta angle during the cardiac cycle. The Kaplan-Meier rate of target lesion failure at 1 year was 11.5%. When the mechanically caused ISRs were treated without new stents, they suffered a higher subsequent event rate (41.4%) compared with non-mechanical causes or mechanical causes treated without restenting (7.8%, unadjusted hazard ratio 6.44, 95% confidence interval: 2.33-17.78; p<0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Half of the ostial RCA ISRs were due to mechanical causes. Subsequent event rates were high, especially in mechanically caused ISRs treated without the implantation of a new stent.

摘要

背景

尽管右冠状动脉(RCA)开口支架置入术后的支架内再狭窄(ISR)发生率较高,但 RCA 开口 ISR 的发生机制尚不清楚。

目的

我们旨在通过血管内超声(IVUS)明确 RCA 开口 ISR 的病因。

方法

共 139 例 RCA 开口 ISR 病变在血管重建前接受 IVUS 检查。将原发性 ISR 机制分为以下几类:1)新生内膜增生(NIH);2)新生动脉粥样硬化;3)支架未覆盖开口;4)支架断裂或变形;5)支架扩张不足(旧最小支架面积<4.0mm 或支架扩张<50%);或 6)突出的钙化结节。

结果

支架置入后中位时间为 1.2 年(四分位距 0.63.1 年)。ISR 的主要机制为 NIH(25%,n=35)、新生动脉粥样硬化(22%,n=30)、支架未覆盖开口(6%,n=9)(生物原因 53%,n=74)、支架断裂或变形(25%,n=35)、扩张不足(11%,n=15)和突出的钙化结节(11%,n=15)(机械原因 47%,n=65)。包括次要机制在内,51%(n=71)的 RCA 开口 ISR 支架断裂与心脏周期中 RCA-主动脉夹角的铰链运动较大有关。1 年时靶病变失败的 Kaplan-Meier 发生率为 11.5%。未行新支架置入治疗的机械性 ISR 患者发生后续不良事件的风险更高(41.4%),而非机械性原因或机械性原因且未行再次支架置入治疗的患者(7.8%)(未校正风险比 6.44,95%置信区间:2.3317.78;p<0.0001)。

结论

半数 RCA 开口 ISR 由机械原因引起。尤其是未植入新支架治疗的机械性 ISR 患者,其后续不良事件发生率较高。

相似文献

6
Intravascular Ultrasound Assessment of In-Stent Restenosis in Saphenous Vein Grafts.血管内超声评估静脉桥血管支架内再狭窄
Am J Cardiol. 2019 Apr 1;123(7):1052-1059. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2018.12.030. Epub 2019 Jan 4.

引用本文的文献

4
Management of Stent Underexpansion and Aorto-ostial Lesions.支架扩张不足及主动脉开口病变的处理
Interv Cardiol. 2024 Dec 23;19:e26. doi: 10.15420/icr.2024.10. eCollection 2024.
5
SCAI Expert Consensus Statement on the Management of Calcified Coronary Lesions.SCAI关于钙化冠状动脉病变管理的专家共识声明
J Soc Cardiovasc Angiogr Interv. 2024 Jan 31;3(2):101259. doi: 10.1016/j.jscai.2023.101259. eCollection 2024 Feb.

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验