• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

揭开实施手术安全检查表的实践改进策略的“黑匣子”:一项过程评估。

Unlocking the "black box" of practice improvement strategies to implement surgical safety checklists: a process evaluation.

作者信息

Gillespie Brigid M, Hamilton Kyra, Ball Dianne, Lavin Joanne, Gardiner Therese, Withers Teresa K, Marshall Andrea P

机构信息

School of Nursing & Midwifery, Griffith University, Gold Coast.

Gold Coast University Hospital and Health Service, Southport.

出版信息

J Multidiscip Healthc. 2017 Apr 5;10:157-166. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S124298. eCollection 2017.

DOI:10.2147/JMDH.S124298
PMID:28435283
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5388350/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Compliance with surgical safety checklists (SSCs) has been associated with improvements in clinical processes such as antibiotic use, correct site marking, and overall safety processes. Yet, proper execution has been difficult to achieve.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study was to undertake a process evaluation of four knowledge translation (KT) strategies used to implement the Pass the Baton (PTB) intervention which was designed to improve utilization of the SSC.

METHODS

As part of the process evaluation, a logic model was generated to explain which KT strategies worked well (or less well) in the operating rooms of a tertiary referral hospital in Queensland, Australia. The KT strategies implemented included change champions/opinion leaders, education, audit and feedback, and reminders. In evaluating the implementation of these strategies, this study considered context, intervention and underpinning assumptions, implementation, and mechanism of impact. Observational and interview data were collected to assess implementation of the KT strategies relative to fidelity, feasibility, and acceptability.

RESULTS

Findings from 35 structured observations and 15 interviews with 96 intervention participants suggest that all of the KT strategies were consistently implemented. Of the 220 staff working in the department, that is, nurses, anesthetists, and surgeons, 160 (72.7%) knew about the PTB strategies. Qualitative analysis revealed that implementation was generally feasible and acceptable. A barrier to feasibility was physician engagement. An impediment to acceptability was participants' skepticism about the ability of the KT strategies to effect behavioral change.

CONCLUSION

Overall, results of this evaluation suggest that success of implementation was moderate. Given the probable impact of contextual factors, that is, team culture and the characteristics of participants, the KT strategies may need modification prior to widespread implementation.

摘要

背景

遵守手术安全核对表(SSCs)与抗生素使用、正确手术部位标记及整体安全流程等临床过程的改善相关。然而,要实现正确执行却很困难。

目的

本研究的目的是对用于实施接力棒传递(PTB)干预措施的四种知识转化(KT)策略进行过程评估,该干预措施旨在提高手术安全核对表的利用率。

方法

作为过程评估的一部分,构建了一个逻辑模型,以解释在澳大利亚昆士兰州一家三级转诊医院的手术室中,哪些KT策略效果良好(或欠佳)。实施的KT策略包括变革推动者/意见领袖、教育、审核与反馈以及提醒。在评估这些策略的实施情况时,本研究考虑了背景、干预措施及基本假设、实施过程和影响机制。收集观察和访谈数据,以评估KT策略在保真度、可行性和可接受性方面的实施情况。

结果

对96名干预参与者进行的35次结构化观察和15次访谈结果表明,所有KT策略均得到持续实施。在该科室工作的220名员工(即护士、麻醉师和外科医生)中,160人(72.7%)了解PTB策略。定性分析显示,实施总体上是可行且可接受的。可行性的一个障碍是医生的参与度。可接受性的一个障碍是参与者对KT策略改变行为能力的怀疑。

结论

总体而言,该评估结果表明实施的成功率中等。鉴于背景因素(即团队文化和参与者特征)可能产生的影响,在广泛实施之前,KT策略可能需要进行修改。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3bfa/5388350/0ff3cf1d1c2c/jmdh-10-157Fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3bfa/5388350/e7a69776304f/jmdh-10-157Fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3bfa/5388350/0ff3cf1d1c2c/jmdh-10-157Fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3bfa/5388350/e7a69776304f/jmdh-10-157Fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3bfa/5388350/0ff3cf1d1c2c/jmdh-10-157Fig2.jpg

相似文献

1
Unlocking the "black box" of practice improvement strategies to implement surgical safety checklists: a process evaluation.揭开实施手术安全检查表的实践改进策略的“黑匣子”:一项过程评估。
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2017 Apr 5;10:157-166. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S124298. eCollection 2017.
2
Implementation of multidimensional knowledge translation strategies to improve procedural pain in hospitalized children.实施多维知识转化策略以改善住院儿童的程序性疼痛。
Implement Sci. 2014 Nov 25;9:120. doi: 10.1186/s13012-014-0120-1.
3
Using normalisation process theory to evaluate the implementation of a complex intervention to embed the surgical safety checklist.运用规范化过程理论评估一项复杂干预措施的实施情况,该干预措施旨在推行手术安全核查表。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Mar 9;18(1):170. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-2973-5.
4
Knowledge translation interventions to sustain direct care provider behaviour change in long-term care: A process evaluation.促进长期护理中直接护理提供者行为持续改变的知识转化干预措施:一项过程评估。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2018 Feb;24(1):159-165. doi: 10.1111/jep.12784. Epub 2017 Jul 10.
5
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
6
The Effectiveness of Integrated Care Pathways for Adults and Children in Health Care Settings: A Systematic Review.综合护理路径在医疗环境中对成人和儿童的有效性:一项系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(3):80-129. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907030-00001.
7
Integrated knowledge translation in nursing homes: exploring the experiences of practice development nurses.养老院内的综合知识转化:探索实践发展护士的经验。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Nov 29;21(1):1283. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-07282-7.
8
Implementation of safety checklists in surgery: a realist synthesis of evidence.手术安全检查表的实施:基于实证的现实主义综合分析
Implement Sci. 2015 Sep 28;10:137. doi: 10.1186/s13012-015-0319-9.
9
Supporting the implementation of stroke quality-based procedures (QBPs): a mixed methods evaluation to identify knowledge translation activities, knowledge translation interventions, and determinants of implementation across Ontario.支持基于质量的卒中程序(QBPs)的实施:一项混合方法评估,旨在确定安大略省实施过程中的知识转化活动、知识转化干预措施和实施决定因素。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Jun 18;18(1):466. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3220-9.
10
Assessment of an integrated knowledge translation intervention to improve nutrition intakes among patients undergoing elective bowel surgery: a mixed-method process evaluation.评估一种综合知识转化干预措施,以改善择期肠道手术患者的营养摄入:混合方法的过程评价。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 May 27;21(1):514. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06493-2.

引用本文的文献

1
Surgical team perceptions of the surgical safety checklist implementation in Indonesian hospitals: a descriptive qualitative study.印度尼西亚医院外科团队对手术安全核对表实施情况的看法:一项描述性定性研究
BMJ Open. 2025 Jun 10;15(6):e089013. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-089013.
2
International Perspectives on Modifications to the Surgical Safety Checklist.国际视角下的手术安全检查表修改
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Jun 1;6(6):e2317183. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.17183.
3
Evaluation of a patient safety programme on Surgical Safety Checklist Compliance: a prospective longitudinal study.

本文引用的文献

1
Physical Activity and Transitioning to College: The Importance of Intentions and Habits.体育活动与向大学过渡:意图和习惯的重要性。
Am J Health Behav. 2016 Mar;40(2):280-90. doi: 10.5993/AJHB.40.2.13.
2
Factors that drive team participation in surgical safety checks: a prospective study.推动团队参与手术安全核查的因素:一项前瞻性研究。
Patient Saf Surg. 2016 Jan 20;10:3. doi: 10.1186/s13037-015-0090-5. eCollection 2016.
3
Impact of workflow on the use of the Surgical Safety Checklist: a qualitative study.工作流程对手术安全核查表使用的影响:一项定性研究。
一项关于手术安全核对表依从性的患者安全计划评估:一项前瞻性纵向研究。
BMJ Open Qual. 2018 Jul 12;7(3):e000362. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2018-000362. eCollection 2018.
4
Using normalisation process theory to evaluate the implementation of a complex intervention to embed the surgical safety checklist.运用规范化过程理论评估一项复杂干预措施的实施情况,该干预措施旨在推行手术安全核查表。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Mar 9;18(1):170. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-2973-5.
ANZ J Surg. 2016 Nov;86(11):864-867. doi: 10.1111/ans.13433. Epub 2016 Jan 7.
4
Implementation of safety checklists in surgery: a realist synthesis of evidence.手术安全检查表的实施:基于实证的现实主义综合分析
Implement Sci. 2015 Sep 28;10:137. doi: 10.1186/s13012-015-0319-9.
5
Implementation of the WHO "Safe Surgery Saves Lives" checklist in a podiatric surgery unit in Spain: a single-center retrospective observational study.西班牙一家足病外科单位实施世界卫生组织“安全手术拯救生命”检查表:一项单中心回顾性观察研究。
Patient Saf Surg. 2015 Aug 28;9:29. doi: 10.1186/s13037-015-0075-4. eCollection 2015.
6
Suboptimal compliance with surgical safety checklists in Colorado: A prospective observational study reveals differences between surgical specialties.科罗拉多州手术安全检查表的依从性欠佳:一项前瞻性观察性研究揭示了不同外科专科之间的差异。
Patient Saf Surg. 2015 Jan 31;9(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s13037-014-0056-z. eCollection 2015.
7
A qualitative evaluation of the barriers and facilitators toward implementation of the WHO surgical safety checklist across hospitals in England: lessons from the "Surgical Checklist Implementation Project".对英格兰各医院实施世界卫生组织手术安全核对表的障碍和促进因素的定性评估:“手术核对表实施项目”的经验教训
Ann Surg. 2015 Jan;261(1):81-91. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000793.
8
Implementation of the surgical safety checklist in Switzerland and perceptions of its benefits: cross-sectional survey.瑞士手术安全核对表的实施及其益处的认知:横断面调查
PLoS One. 2014 Jul 18;9(7):e101915. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0101915. eCollection 2014.
9
Effect of using a safety checklist on patient complications after surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.使用安全检查表对手术后患者并发症的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Anesthesiology. 2014 Jun;120(6):1380-9. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000000232.
10
Systematic review and meta-analysis of the effect of the World Health Organization surgical safety checklist on postoperative complications.系统评价和荟萃分析世界卫生组织手术安全检查表对术后并发症的影响。
Br J Surg. 2014 Feb;101(3):150-8. doi: 10.1002/bjs.9381.