• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

儿科麻醉学随机对照试验的脆弱性指数。

The Fragility Index of randomized controlled trials in pediatric anesthesiology.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, The Hospital for Sick Children (SickKids), 555 University Avenue, Toronto, ON, M5G 1X8, Canada.

Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.

出版信息

Can J Anaesth. 2023 Sep;70(9):1449-1460. doi: 10.1007/s12630-023-02513-3. Epub 2023 Jun 8.

DOI:10.1007/s12630-023-02513-3
PMID:37286747
Abstract

PURPOSE

The P value is a widely used measure of statistical importance but has many drawbacks and limitations, one being that it does not reflect the robustness of the results of a clinical trial. The Fragility Index (FI) was developed as a measure of how many outcome events would need to change to nonevents to render a significant P value nonsignificant (P ≥ 0.05). The FI of trials from other medical specialties is typically < 5. We aimed to determine the FI of pediatric anesthesiology randomized controlled trials (RCT) and to test for association with various characteristics of the included trials.

METHODS

We conducted a comprehensive systematic search of high-impact anesthesia, surgical, and medical journals from the last 25 years for trials comparing an intervention between two groups with a statistically significant P value (< 0.05) for a dichotomous outcome. We also compared FI values for variables that reflect the quality and importance of a trial.

RESULTS

The median [interquartile range] FI was 3 [1-7] and correlated positively with the number of participants (r = 0.41; P < 0.001) and events (r = 0.42; P < 0.001), and negatively with the P value (r = -0.36; P < 0.001). Other measures of trial quality and impact or importance were not strongly associated with the FI.

CONCLUSIONS

The FI of published trials in pediatric anesthesiology is similarly low as in other medical specialties. Larger trials with more events and P values ≤ 0.01 were associated with a higher FI.

摘要

目的

P 值是一种广泛使用的统计显著性度量标准,但它有许多缺点和局限性,其中之一是它不能反映临床试验结果的稳健性。脆弱指数(FI)是作为衡量需要改变多少个结局事件才能使有统计学意义的 P 值变得无统计学意义(P≥0.05)的指标而开发的。其他医学专业的试验的 FI 通常<5。我们旨在确定儿科麻醉学随机对照试验(RCT)的 FI,并检验其与纳入试验的各种特征之间的关联。

方法

我们对过去 25 年的高影响力麻醉、外科和医学期刊进行了全面的系统检索,以寻找比较两种干预措施的 RCT,这些干预措施在二分类结局上具有统计学意义的 P 值(<0.05)。我们还比较了反映试验质量和重要性的变量的 FI 值。

结果

中位数[四分位数范围]FI 为 3[1-7],与参与者数量呈正相关(r=0.41;P<0.001)和事件数量呈正相关(r=0.42;P<0.001),与 P 值呈负相关(r=-0.36;P<0.001)。其他试验质量和影响或重要性的衡量标准与 FI 相关性不强。

结论

发表的儿科麻醉学 RCT 的 FI 与其他医学专业相似较低。具有更多事件和 P 值≤0.01 的较大试验与较高的 FI 相关。

相似文献

1
The Fragility Index of randomized controlled trials in pediatric anesthesiology.儿科麻醉学随机对照试验的脆弱性指数。
Can J Anaesth. 2023 Sep;70(9):1449-1460. doi: 10.1007/s12630-023-02513-3. Epub 2023 Jun 8.
2
Are results from randomized trials in anesthesiology robust or fragile? An analysis using the fragility index.麻醉学随机试验的结果是否稳健或脆弱?使用脆弱指数进行分析。
Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2020 Mar;18(1):116-124. doi: 10.1097/XEB.0000000000000200.
3
Statistical robustness of randomized controlled trials in high-impact journals has improved but was low across medical specialties.高影响力期刊中随机对照试验的统计稳健性有所提高,但在各医学专科中仍处于较低水平。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2022 Oct;150:165-170. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2022.07.001. Epub 2022 Jul 9.
4
Fragility of Results in Ophthalmology Randomized Controlled Trials: A Systematic Review.眼科随机对照试验结果的脆弱性:系统评价。
Ophthalmology. 2018 May;125(5):642-648. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2017.11.015. Epub 2017 Dec 11.
5
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
6
Assessing the robustness of positive vascular surgery randomized controlled trials using their fragility index.评估阳性血管外科学随机对照试验的稳健性:脆弱指数的应用。
J Vasc Surg. 2024 Jan;79(1):148-158.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2023.05.051. Epub 2023 Jun 12.
7
The fragility of statistically significant findings in randomised controlled anaesthesiology trials: systematic review of the medical literature.随机对照麻醉学试验中统计学显著结果的脆弱性:医学文献的系统评价。
Br J Anaesth. 2018 May;120(5):935-941. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2018.01.012. Epub 2018 Feb 13.
8
Fragility of randomized controlled trials on treatment of proximal humeral fracture.治疗肱骨近端骨折的随机对照试验的脆弱性。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2022 Aug;31(8):1610-1616. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2022.01.141. Epub 2022 Mar 1.
9
The Fragility of Statistical Findings in Distal Radius Fractures: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials.桡骨远端骨折中统计结果的脆弱性:一项随机对照试验的系统回顾。
Injury. 2022 Oct;53(10):3352-3356. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2022.07.017. Epub 2022 Jul 13.
10
Fragility Index in Cardiovascular Randomized Controlled Trials.心血管随机对照试验中的脆弱性指数。
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2019 Dec;12(12):e005755. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.119.005755. Epub 2019 Dec 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Risk factors for pediatric emergence delirium: a systematic review.小儿苏醒期谵妄的危险因素:一项系统综述
Can J Anaesth. 2025 Mar;72(3):384-396. doi: 10.1007/s12630-024-02889-w. Epub 2025 Feb 26.
2
Fragility Index and Fragility Quotient in Statistically Significant Randomized Controlled Trials in Plastic Breast Surgery.整形乳房手术中具有统计学意义的随机对照试验中的脆弱性指数和脆弱性商数。
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2024 Jun 20;12(6):e5916. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000005916. eCollection 2024 Jun.
3
Perioperative clinical practice recommendations for pediatric tonsillectomy: a systematic review.

本文引用的文献

1
A method for calculating the fragility index of continuous outcomes.一种计算连续结局脆弱指数的方法。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2021 Aug;136:20-25. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.02.023. Epub 2021 Mar 5.
2
Dismantling the Fragility Index: A demonstration of statistical reasoning.拆解脆弱指数:统计推理的演示。
Stat Med. 2020 Nov 20;39(26):3720-3731. doi: 10.1002/sim.8689. Epub 2020 Aug 11.
3
Are results from randomized trials in anesthesiology robust or fragile? An analysis using the fragility index.麻醉学随机试验的结果是否稳健或脆弱?使用脆弱指数进行分析。
小儿扁桃体切除术围手术期临床实践推荐:系统评价。
Can J Anaesth. 2024 Feb;71(2):187-200. doi: 10.1007/s12630-023-02668-z. Epub 2024 Jan 5.
4
Comment on: The fragility index of randomized controlled trials in pediatric anesthesiology.关于《儿科麻醉学中随机对照试验的脆弱性指数》的评论
Can J Anaesth. 2024 Jan;71(1):163-164. doi: 10.1007/s12630-023-02658-1. Epub 2023 Nov 21.
5
In reply: Comment on: The fragility index of randomized controlled trials in pediatric anesthesiology.回复:对《儿科麻醉学中随机对照试验的脆弱性指数》的评论
Can J Anaesth. 2024 Jan;71(1):165-166. doi: 10.1007/s12630-023-02659-0. Epub 2023 Nov 21.
6
How to mitigate confounding factors in observational studies.如何在观察性研究中减轻混杂因素的影响。
J Anesth. 2023 Oct;37(5):663-665. doi: 10.1007/s00540-023-03236-x. Epub 2023 Aug 2.
Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2020 Mar;18(1):116-124. doi: 10.1097/XEB.0000000000000200.
4
Over-reliance on P Values in Urology: Fragility of Findings in the Hydronephrosis Literature Calls for Systematic Reporting of Robustness Indicators.泌尿科中对 P 值的过度依赖:积水文献中研究结果的脆弱性呼吁系统地报告稳健性指标。
Urology. 2019 Nov;133:204-210. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2019.03.045. Epub 2019 Jul 30.
5
Quality of reporting and fragility index for randomized controlled trials in the vesicoureteral reflux literature: where do we stand?随机对照试验在膀胱输尿管反流文献中的报告质量和脆弱指数:我们处于什么位置?
J Pediatr Urol. 2019 May;15(3):204-212. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2019.02.014. Epub 2019 Mar 7.
6
Altmetrics should not be used for ranking of anaesthesia journals.替代计量指标不应被用于麻醉学期刊的排名。
Br J Anaesth. 2018 Aug;121(2):514-516. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2018.05.048. Epub 2018 Jun 14.
7
The fragility of statistically significant findings in randomised controlled anaesthesiology trials: systematic review of the medical literature.随机对照麻醉学试验中统计学显著结果的脆弱性:医学文献的系统评价。
Br J Anaesth. 2018 May;120(5):935-941. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2018.01.012. Epub 2018 Feb 13.
8
Sample size calculations for randomized clinical trials published in anesthesiology journals: a comparison of 2010 versus 2016.麻醉学期刊发表的随机临床试验的样本量计算:2010 年与 2016 年的比较。
Can J Anaesth. 2018 Jun;65(6):611-618. doi: 10.1007/s12630-018-1109-z. Epub 2018 Mar 22.
9
Prospective clinical trial registration: not sufficient, but always necessary.
Anaesthesia. 2018 May;73(5):538-541. doi: 10.1111/anae.14189. Epub 2018 Jan 2.
10
The fragility of significant results underscores the need of larger randomized controlled trials in nephrology.显著结果的脆弱性凸显了肾脏病学中更大规模随机对照试验的必要性。
Kidney Int. 2017 Dec;92(6):1469-1475. doi: 10.1016/j.kint.2017.05.011. Epub 2017 Jul 26.