• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

In reply: Comment on: The fragility index of randomized controlled trials in pediatric anesthesiology.

作者信息

Hayes Jason, Aoyama Kazuyoshi

机构信息

Department of Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, SickKids Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.

Department of Anesthesia and Pain Medicine and Program in Child Health Evaluative Sciences, SickKids Research Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.

出版信息

Can J Anaesth. 2024 Jan;71(1):165-166. doi: 10.1007/s12630-023-02659-0. Epub 2023 Nov 21.

DOI:10.1007/s12630-023-02659-0
PMID:37989935
Abstract
摘要

相似文献

1
In reply: Comment on: The fragility index of randomized controlled trials in pediatric anesthesiology.回复：对《儿科麻醉学中随机对照试验的脆弱性指数》的评论
Can J Anaesth. 2024 Jan;71(1):165-166. doi: 10.1007/s12630-023-02659-0. Epub 2023 Nov 21.
2
Comment on: The fragility index of randomized controlled trials in pediatric anesthesiology.关于《儿科麻醉学中随机对照试验的脆弱性指数》的评论
Can J Anaesth. 2024 Jan;71(1):163-164. doi: 10.1007/s12630-023-02658-1. Epub 2023 Nov 21.
3
Are results from randomized trials in anesthesiology robust or fragile? An analysis using the fragility index.麻醉学随机试验的结果是否稳健或脆弱？使用脆弱指数进行分析。
Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2020 Mar;18(1):116-124. doi: 10.1097/XEB.0000000000000200.
4
The Fragility Index of randomized controlled trials in pediatric anesthesiology.儿科麻醉学随机对照试验的脆弱性指数。
Can J Anaesth. 2023 Sep;70(9):1449-1460. doi: 10.1007/s12630-023-02513-3. Epub 2023 Jun 8.
5
The Fragility of Statistically Significant Findings in Pediatric Critical Care Randomized Controlled Trials.儿科危重症随机对照试验中统计学显著结果的脆弱性。
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2019 Jun;20(6):e258-e262. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000001922.
6
The Fragility and Reliability of Conclusions of Anesthesia and Critical Care Randomized Trials With Statistically Significant Findings: A Systematic Review.具有统计学意义的麻醉和重症监护随机试验结论的脆弱性和可靠性：系统评价。
Crit Care Med. 2019 Mar;47(3):456-462. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003527.
7
The Fragility of Statistically Significant Randomized Controlled Trials in Plastic Surgery.整形外科中统计学显著的随机对照试验的脆弱性。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019 Nov;144(5):1238-1245. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000006102.
8
Fragility index and fragility quotient in randomized clinical trials.随机临床试验中的脆弱性指数和脆弱性商数。
J Bras Pneumol. 2023 Mar 17;49(1):e20230034. doi: 10.36416/1806-3756/e20230034.
9
The Fragility of Statistically Significant Results in Pediatric Orthopaedic Randomized Controlled Trials as Quantified by the Fragility Index: A Systematic Review.通过脆弱性指数量化的儿科骨科随机对照试验中具有统计学意义结果的脆弱性：一项系统评价
J Pediatr Orthop. 2018 Sep;38(8):e418-e423. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000001201.
10
The statistical significance of randomized controlled trial results is frequently fragile: a case for a Fragility Index.随机对照试验结果的统计学显著性往往很脆弱：关于脆弱性指数的一个案例。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2014 Jun;67(6):622-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.10.019. Epub 2014 Feb 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Risk factors for pediatric emergence delirium: a systematic review.小儿苏醒期谵妄的危险因素：一项系统综述
Can J Anaesth. 2025 Mar;72(3):384-396. doi: 10.1007/s12630-024-02889-w. Epub 2025 Feb 26.
2
Roles of evidence synthesis studies and evidence-based clinical practice guidelines in pediatric perioperative outcomes research.证据综合研究和循证临床实践指南在儿科围手术期结局研究中的作用。
J Anesth. 2025 Feb;39(1):1-4. doi: 10.1007/s00540-024-03437-y. Epub 2024 Dec 18.
3
Fragility in cardiovascular randomized controlled trials with primary continuous outcomes (2018-2022) from multi-perspectives assessment: a cross-sectional survey.

本文引用的文献

1
The Fragility Index of randomized controlled trials in pediatric anesthesiology.儿科麻醉学随机对照试验的脆弱性指数。
Can J Anaesth. 2023 Sep;70(9):1449-1460. doi: 10.1007/s12630-023-02513-3. Epub 2023 Jun 8.
2
The impact of study size on meta-analyses: examination of underpowered studies in Cochrane reviews.研究规模对荟萃分析的影响：考科蓝评价中检验低效能研究。
PLoS One. 2013;8(3):e59202. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0059202. Epub 2013 Mar 27.
3
Reporting of sample size calculation in randomised controlled trials: review.随机对照试验中样本量计算的报告：综述
多视角评估2018 - 2022年主要连续性结局的心血管随机对照试验中的脆弱性：一项横断面调查
Ann Med. 2024 Dec;56(1):2427909. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2024.2427909. Epub 2024 Dec 3.
4
Understanding three standard study designs for randomized controlled trials.了解随机对照试验的三种标准研究设计。
J Anesth. 2024 Aug;38(4):421-424. doi: 10.1007/s00540-024-03355-z. Epub 2024 Jun 24.
BMJ. 2009 May 12;338:b1732. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b1732.
4
In the era of systematic reviews, does the size of an individual trial still matter.在系统评价的时代，单个试验的规模仍然重要吗？
PLoS Med. 2008 Jan 3;5(1):e4. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0050004.
5
Statistics and ethics in medical research: III How large a sample?医学研究中的统计学与伦理学：III样本量应为多大？
Br Med J. 1980 Nov 15;281(6251):1336-8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.281.6251.1336.