• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

超重的肝细胞癌患者行机器人肝切除术与开腹肝切除术的短期疗效比较:倾向评分匹配研究。

Short-term outcomes of robotic versus open hepatectomy among overweight patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: a propensity score-matched study.

机构信息

Medical School of Chinese PLA, Beijing, 100853, China.

Faculty of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, The First Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, 100853, China.

出版信息

BMC Surg. 2023 Jun 7;23(1):153. doi: 10.1186/s12893-023-02058-8.

DOI:10.1186/s12893-023-02058-8
PMID:37286991
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10246414/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Robotic hepatectomy (RH) has gradually been accepted as it has overcome some of the limitations of open hepatectomy (OH). This study was to compare short-term outcomes in RH and OH for overweight (preoperative body mass index ≥ 25 kg/m²) patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

METHODS

Perioperative and postoperative data from these patients who underwent RH or OH between January 2010 and December 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. Propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was performed to determine the impact of RH versus OH on the prognosis of overweight HCC patients.

RESULTS

All 304 overweight HCC patients were included, 172 who were underwent RH, and 132 who were underwent OH. After the 1:1 PSM, there were 104 patients in both RH and OH groups. After PSM, the RH group of patients had a shorter operative time, less estimated blood loss (EBL), a longer total clamping time, a shorter postoperative length of stay (LOS), less chance of surgical site infection and less rates of blood transfusion (all P < 0.05) compared to the OH patients. The differences between operative time, EBL and LOS were more significant in obese patients. RH was found to be an independent protective factor of EBL ≥ 400ml relative to OH in overweight patients for the first time.

CONCLUSIONS

RH was safe and feasible in overweight HCC patients. Compared with OH, RH has advantages in terms of operative time, EBL, postoperative LOS, and surgical site infection. Carefully selected overweight patients should be considered for RH.

摘要

背景

机器人肝切除术 (RH) 逐渐被接受,因为它克服了开腹肝切除术 (OH) 的一些局限性。本研究旨在比较 RH 和 OH 治疗超重 (术前体质量指数≥25kg/m²) 肝细胞癌 (HCC) 患者的短期疗效。

方法

回顾性分析 2010 年 1 月至 2020 年 12 月期间接受 RH 或 OH 的超重 HCC 患者的围手术期和术后数据。采用倾向评分匹配 (PSM) 分析来确定 RH 与 OH 对超重 HCC 患者预后的影响。

结果

共纳入 304 例超重 HCC 患者,其中 172 例行 RH,132 例行 OH。经过 1:1 PSM 后,RH 和 OH 组各有 104 例患者。PSM 后,与 OH 组相比,RH 组患者的手术时间更短,估计出血量 (EBL) 更少,总阻断时间更长,术后住院时间 (LOS) 更短,手术部位感染的机会更少,输血率更低(均 P<0.05)。肥胖患者的手术时间、EBL 和 LOS 的差异更为显著。首次发现 RH 是超重患者 EBL≥400ml 相对于 OH 的独立保护因素。

结论

RH 对超重 HCC 患者是安全可行的。与 OH 相比,RH 在手术时间、EBL、术后 LOS 和手术部位感染方面具有优势。对于超重患者,应慎重选择 RH。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/75b4/10246414/ba5f9af7629c/12893_2023_2058_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/75b4/10246414/ba5f9af7629c/12893_2023_2058_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/75b4/10246414/ba5f9af7629c/12893_2023_2058_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Short-term outcomes of robotic versus open hepatectomy among overweight patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: a propensity score-matched study.超重的肝细胞癌患者行机器人肝切除术与开腹肝切除术的短期疗效比较:倾向评分匹配研究。
BMC Surg. 2023 Jun 7;23(1):153. doi: 10.1186/s12893-023-02058-8.
2
Short-term and long-term outcomes after robotic versus open hepatectomy in patients with large hepatocellular carcinoma: a multicenter study.机器人与开腹肝切除术治疗大肝癌患者的短期和长期疗效:一项多中心研究。
Int J Surg. 2024 Feb 1;110(2):660-667. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000000873.
3
Propensity score matched comparison of robotic and open major hepatectomy for malignant liver tumors.机器人与开放性大肝切除术治疗恶性肝肿瘤的倾向评分匹配比较。
Surg Endosc. 2022 Sep;36(9):6724-6732. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08948-3. Epub 2022 Jan 3.
4
Short- and long-term outcomes after robotic and open liver resection for elderly patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: a propensity score-matched study.老年肝细胞癌患者机器人辅助与开放肝切除术后的短期和长期结局:一项倾向评分匹配研究
Surg Endosc. 2022 Nov;36(11):8132-8143. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09236-4. Epub 2022 May 9.
5
Robotic versus laparoscopic hepatectomy: A single-center, propensity score- matched study.机器人与腹腔镜肝切除术:单中心、倾向评分匹配研究。
Asian J Surg. 2023 Sep;46(9):3593-3600. doi: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2023.07.049. Epub 2023 Aug 1.
6
Outcomes following laparoscopic versus open major hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with cirrhosis: a propensity score-matched analysis.腹腔镜与开腹肝切除术治疗肝硬化肝细胞癌的结果:倾向评分匹配分析。
Surg Endosc. 2018 Feb;32(2):712-719. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5727-2. Epub 2017 Jul 19.
7
Outcomes of pure laparoscopic Glissonian pedicle approach hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma: a propensity score matching analysis.纯腹腔镜 Glisson 蒂 approach 肝切除术治疗肝细胞癌的疗效:倾向评分匹配分析。
Surg Endosc. 2019 Apr;33(4):1155-1166. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6380-0. Epub 2018 Aug 17.
8
Laparoscopic Liver Surgery: What Are the Advantages in Patients with Cirrhosis and Portal Hypertension? Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis with Personal Experience.腹腔镜肝切除术:肝硬化和门静脉高压患者的优势是什么?系统评价和荟萃分析及个人经验。
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2020 Oct;30(10):1054-1065. doi: 10.1089/lap.2020.0408. Epub 2020 Jul 20.
9
Laparoscopic hepatectomy versus open hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma in 157 patients: A case controlled study with propensity score matching at two Chinese centres.腹腔镜肝切除术与开腹肝切除术治疗 157 例肝细胞癌的病例对照研究:在中国两家中心采用倾向评分匹配的方法
Int J Surg. 2018 Aug;56:203-207. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.06.026. Epub 2018 Jun 20.
10
Laparoscopic versus Open Hepatectomy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Elderly Patients: A Single-Institutional Propensity Score Matching Comparison.腹腔镜与开腹肝切除术治疗老年肝细胞癌的单中心倾向评分匹配比较。
Dig Surg. 2020;37(6):495-504. doi: 10.1159/000510960. Epub 2020 Oct 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of robotic liver resection in obese vs. non-obese patients: a multicentric propensity score-matched analysis of perioperative outcomes.肥胖与非肥胖患者机器人肝切除术的比较:围手术期结局的多中心倾向评分匹配分析
Updates Surg. 2025 Jun 29. doi: 10.1007/s13304-025-02303-0.
2
Robotic Caudate Lobectomy: Feasibility and Techniques with Da Vinci Xi and SP Systems.机器人尾状叶切除术:使用达芬奇 Xi 和 SP 系统的可行性及技术
JSLS. 2025 Jan-Mar;29(1). doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2024.00057. Epub 2025 Apr 7.
3
Surgical treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma in era of multidisciplinary strategies.

本文引用的文献

1
Effect of Robot-Assisted Radical Cystectomy With Intracorporeal Urinary Diversion vs Open Radical Cystectomy on 90-Day Morbidity and Mortality Among Patients With Bladder Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial.机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术与体外尿路分流术对比开放性根治性膀胱切除术对膀胱癌患者 90 天内发病率和死亡率的影响:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2022 Jun 7;327(21):2092-2103. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.7393.
2
Short- and long-term outcomes after robotic and open liver resection for elderly patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: a propensity score-matched study.老年肝细胞癌患者机器人辅助与开放肝切除术后的短期和长期结局:一项倾向评分匹配研究
Surg Endosc. 2022 Nov;36(11):8132-8143. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09236-4. Epub 2022 May 9.
3
多学科策略时代的肝细胞癌外科治疗
Int J Clin Oncol. 2025 Mar;30(3):417-426. doi: 10.1007/s10147-025-02703-7. Epub 2025 Feb 5.
4
Experience-based transition to robotic surgery in an experienced program in minimally invasive hepatobiliary surgery.在经验丰富的微创肝胆外科项目中,基于经验向机器人手术过渡。
Surg Endosc. 2024 Dec;38(12):7309-7318. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11309-5. Epub 2024 Oct 15.
5
Surgical Implications for Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis-Related Hepatocellular Carcinoma.非酒精性脂肪性肝炎相关肝细胞癌的手术意义
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Aug 6;16(16):2773. doi: 10.3390/cancers16162773.
6
Exploring the feasibility of robotic liver resection in a limited resource setting.探讨在资源有限的情况下进行机器人肝切除术的可行性。
J Robot Surg. 2024 Apr 29;18(1):187. doi: 10.1007/s11701-024-01901-1.
Propensity score matched comparison of robotic and open major hepatectomy for malignant liver tumors.
机器人与开放性大肝切除术治疗恶性肝肿瘤的倾向评分匹配比较。
Surg Endosc. 2022 Sep;36(9):6724-6732. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08948-3. Epub 2022 Jan 3.
4
Minimally invasive anatomic liver resection: Results of a survey of world experts.微创解剖性肝切除术:世界专家调查结果。
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2022 Jan;29(1):33-40. doi: 10.1002/jhbp.1094. Epub 2021 Dec 15.
5
Expert Consensus Guidelines: How to safely perform minimally invasive anatomic liver resection.专家共识指南:如何安全地进行微创解剖性肝切除术。
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2022 Jan;29(1):16-32. doi: 10.1002/jhbp.1079. Epub 2021 Nov 29.
6
Minimally invasive liver resection for huge (≥10 cm) tumors: an international multicenter matched cohort study with regression discontinuity analyses.巨大(≥10厘米)肿瘤的微创肝切除术:一项采用回归间断分析的国际多中心匹配队列研究
Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr. 2021 Oct;10(5):587-597. doi: 10.21037/hbsn-21-327.
7
Overweight with HBV infection limited the efficacy of TACE in hepatocellular carcinoma by inhibiting the upregulated HMGB1.HBV 感染合并超重通过抑制上调的 HMGB1 限制了 TACE 在肝细胞癌中的疗效。
BMC Cancer. 2021 Sep 28;21(1):1063. doi: 10.1186/s12885-021-08783-8.
8
Perioperative and Oncological Outcomes of Robotic Versus Open Pancreaticoduodenectomy in Low-Risk Surgical Candidates: A Multicenter Propensity Score-Matched Study.低危手术患者机器人胰十二指肠切除术与开腹胰十二指肠切除术的围手术期和肿瘤学结局:一项多中心倾向评分匹配研究。
Ann Surg. 2023 Apr 1;277(4):e864-e871. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005160. Epub 2021 Aug 19.
9
Laparoscopic left hemihepatectomy combined with right lateral hepatic lobectomy in pigs: surgical approach and comparative study of the inflammatory response versus open surgery.猪腹腔镜下左半肝切除术联合右外侧肝叶切除术:手术方法及与开放手术相比的炎症反应研究
Vet Res Forum. 2021 Winter;12(1):1-6. doi: 10.30466/vrf.2019.105865.2518. Epub 2021 Mar 15.
10
Impact of the preoperative body composition indexes on intraoperative blood loss in patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy.术前体成分指标对胰十二指肠切除术患者术中出血量的影响。
Surg Today. 2021 Jan;51(1):52-60. doi: 10.1007/s00595-020-02054-y. Epub 2020 Jun 20.