Critten Sarah, Connelly Vincent, Dockrell Julie E, Mundy Ian R, O'Rourke Lynsey, Callaghan Laura, Walter Kirsty
School of Education, Childhood, Youth and Sport, The Open University, Milton Keynes, United Kingdom.
Department of Psychology, Health and Professional Development, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Front Psychol. 2023 May 23;14:1112462. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1112462. eCollection 2023.
Representations activated during handwriting production code information on morphological structure and reflect decomposition of the root and suffix. Children with Developmental Language Disorder (DLD) have significant difficulties in spelling morphologically complex words, but previous research has not sought evidence for a morphological decomposition effect via an examination of handwriting processes in this population.
Thirty-three children aged 9-10 years with DLD, 33 children matched for chronological age (CA), and 33 younger children aged 7-8 years matched for oral language ability (LA) completed a dictated spelling task (21 words; 12 with inflectional suffixes, nine with derivational suffixes). The task was completed on paper with an inking pen linked to a graphics tablet running the handwriting software Eye and Pen. Pause analyses and letter duration analyses were conducted.
The three groups showed similar handwriting processes, evidencing a morphological decomposition effect in a natural writing task. Pause durations observed at the root/suffix boundary were significantly longer than those occurring in the root. Letter durations were also significantly longer for the letter immediately prior to the boundary compared to the letter after it. Nevertheless, despite being commensurate to their LA matches for mean pause durations and letter durations, children with DLD were significantly poorer at spelling derivational morphemes. Handwriting processes did significantly predict spelling accuracy but to a much lesser extent compared to reading ability.
It is suggested that derivational spelling difficulties in DLD may derive more from problems with underspecified orthographic representations as opposed to handwriting processing differences.
书写过程中激活的表征编码了形态结构信息,并反映了词根和词缀的分解。发育性语言障碍(DLD)儿童在拼写形态复杂的单词时存在显著困难,但先前的研究尚未通过考察该人群的书写过程来寻找形态分解效应的证据。
33名9至10岁的DLD儿童、33名年龄匹配的儿童以及33名7至8岁的语言能力匹配的年幼儿童完成了听写拼写任务(21个单词;12个带有屈折词缀,9个带有派生词缀)。该任务在纸上使用与运行手写软件Eye and Pen的数位板相连的墨水笔完成。进行了停顿分析和字母持续时间分析。
三组儿童表现出相似的书写过程,在自然书写任务中证明了形态分解效应。在词根/词缀边界观察到的停顿持续时间明显长于在词根中出现的停顿持续时间。与边界后的字母相比,边界前紧邻的字母的持续时间也明显更长。然而,尽管DLD儿童在平均停顿持续时间和字母持续时间上与语言能力匹配的儿童相当,但他们在拼写派生词素方面明显较差。书写过程确实显著预测了拼写准确性,但与阅读能力相比,预测程度要小得多。
有人认为,DLD儿童在派生词拼写方面的困难可能更多地源于正字法表征不明确的问题,而不是书写加工差异。