Suppr超能文献

中度至重度过敏性鼻炎许可剂量鼻用糖皮质激素的比较疗效和可接受性:一项系统评价和网状Meta分析

Comparative efficacy and acceptability of licensed dose intranasal corticosteroids for moderate-to-severe allergic rhinitis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

作者信息

Soe Kay Khine, Krikeerati Thanachit, Pheerapanyawaranun Chatkamol, Niyomnaitham Suvimol, Phinyo Phichayut, Thongngarm Torpong

机构信息

Department of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.

Division of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.

出版信息

Front Pharmacol. 2023 May 23;14:1184552. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1184552. eCollection 2023.

Abstract

No evidence shows that one intranasal corticosteroid (INCS) is better than another for treating moderate-to-severe allergic rhinitis (AR). This network meta-analysis assessed the comparative efficacy and acceptability of licensed dose aqueous INCSs. PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched until 31 March 2022. Eligible studies included randomized controlled trials comparing INCSs with placebo or other types of INCSs in patients with moderate-to-severe allergic rhinitis. Two reviewers independently screened and extracted data following the Preferred Reporting Items in Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis guideline. A random-effects model was used for data pooling. Continuous outcomes were expressed as standardized mean difference (SMD). The primary outcomes were the efficacy in improving total nasal symptom score (TNSS) and treatment acceptability (the study dropout). We included 26 studies, 13 with 5,134 seasonal AR patients and 13 with 4,393 perennial AR patients. Most placebo-controlled studies had a moderate quality of evidence. In seasonal AR, mometasone furoate (MF) was ranked the highest efficacy, followed by fluticasone furoate (FF), ciclesonide (CIC), fluticasone propionate and triamcinolone acetonide (TAA) (SMD -0.47, 95% CI: -0.63 to -0.31; -0.46, 95% CI: -0.59 to -0.33; -0.44, 95% CI: -0.75 to -0.13; -0.42, 95% CI: -0.67 to -0.17 and -0.41, 95% CI: -0.81 to -0.00), In perennial AR, budesonide was ranked the highest efficacy, followed by FF, TAA, CIC, and MF (SMD -0.43, 95% CI: -0.75 to -0.11; -0.36, 95% CI: -0.53 to -0.19; -0.32, 95% CI: -0.54 to -0.10; -0.29, 95% CI: -0.48 to -0.11; and -0.28, 95% CI: -0.55 to -0.01). The acceptability of all included INCSs was not inferior to the placebo. According to our indirect comparison, some INCSs have superior efficacy to others with moderate quality of evidence in most placebo-controlled studies for treating moderate-to-severe AR.

摘要

没有证据表明一种鼻内皮质类固醇(INCS)在治疗中重度过敏性鼻炎(AR)方面比另一种更好。这项网络荟萃分析评估了许可剂量水性INCS的比较疗效和可接受性。检索了PubMed/MEDLINE、Scopus、EMBASE和Cochrane对照试验中央注册库,直至2022年3月31日。符合条件的研究包括在中重度过敏性鼻炎患者中比较INCS与安慰剂或其他类型INCS的随机对照试验。两名 reviewers 按照系统评价和荟萃分析指南中的首选报告项目独立筛选和提取数据。采用随机效应模型进行数据合并。连续结局以标准化均数差(SMD)表示。主要结局是改善总鼻症状评分(TNSS)的疗效和治疗可接受性(研究退出率)。我们纳入了26项研究,其中13项研究有5134例季节性AR患者,13项研究有4393例常年性AR患者。大多数安慰剂对照研究的证据质量中等。在季节性AR中,糠酸莫米松(MF)的疗效排名最高,其次是糠酸氟替卡松(FF)、环索奈德(CIC)、丙酸氟替卡松和曲安奈德(TAA)(SMD -0.47,95%CI:-0.63至-0.31;-0.46,95%CI:-0.59至-0.33;-0.44,95%CI:-0.75至-0.13;-0.42,95%CI:-0.67至-0.17;-0.41,95%CI:-0.81至-0.00)。在常年性AR中,布地奈德的疗效排名最高,其次是FF、TAA、CIC和MF(SMD -0.43,95%CI:-0.75至-0.11;-0.36,95%CI:-0.53至-0.19;-0.32,95%CI:-0.54至-0.10;-0.29,95%CI:-0.48至-0.11;-0.28,95%CI:-0.55至-0.01)。所有纳入的INCS的可接受性均不低于安慰剂。根据我们的间接比较,在大多数安慰剂对照研究中,一些INCS在治疗中重度AR方面具有中等质量证据的优于其他药物的疗效。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f199/10242043/d83152e67bb6/fphar-14-1184552-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验