文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)对峰值扭矩和 5000 米跑成绩的急性影响:一项随机对照试验。

Acute effects of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on peak torque and 5000 m running performance: a randomized controlled trial.

机构信息

Department of Physical Education, Federal University of Sergipe (UFS), São Cristóvão, Brazil.

Graduate Program in Physical Education, Federal University of Sergipe (UFS), São Cristóvão, Brazil.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2023 Jun 8;13(1):9362. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-36093-5.


DOI:10.1038/s41598-023-36093-5
PMID:37291264
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10250526/
Abstract

The benefits of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on brain function, cognitive response, and motor ability are well described in scientific literature. Nevertheless, the effects of tDCS on athletes' performance remain unclear. To compare the acute effects of tDCS on the running performance of 5000 m (m) runners. Eighteen athletes were randomized into Anodal (n = 9) groups that received tDCS for 20 min and 2 mA, and Sham (n = 9), in the motor cortex region (M1). Running time in 5000 m, speed, perceived exertion (RPE), internal load and peak torque (Pt) were evaluated. The Shapiro-Wilk test followed by a paired Student's t-test was used to compare Pt and total time to complete the run between the groups. The running time and speed of the Anodal group (p = 0.02; 95% CI 0.11-2.32; d = 1.24) was lower than the Sham group (p = 0.02, 95% CI 0.05-2.20; d = 1.15). However, no difference was found in Pt (p = 0.70; 95% CI - 0.75 to 1.11; d = 0.18), RPE (p = 0.23; 95% CI - 1.55 to 0.39; d = 0.60) and internal charge (p = 0.73; 95% CI - 0.77 to 1.09; d = 0.17). Our data indicate that tDCS can acutely optimize the time and speed of 5000 m runners. However, no alterations were found for Pt and RPE.

摘要

经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)对大脑功能、认知反应和运动能力的益处已在科学文献中得到充分描述。然而,tDCS 对运动员表现的影响仍不清楚。为了比较 tDCS 对 5000 米(m)跑步运动员表现的急性影响。将 18 名运动员随机分为阳极(n = 9)组,接受 20 分钟和 2 mA 的 tDCS,以及假(n = 9)组,刺激运动皮层区域(M1)。评估 5000 米跑的用时、速度、感知用力(RPE)、内部负荷和峰值扭矩(Pt)。采用 Shapiro-Wilk 检验后,对组间 Pt 和完成跑步的总时间进行配对学生 t 检验。阳极组的跑步时间和速度(p = 0.02;95%CI 0.11-2.32;d = 1.24)低于假组(p = 0.02,95%CI 0.05-2.20;d = 1.15)。然而,Pt 无差异(p = 0.70;95%CI-0.75 至 1.11;d = 0.18)、RPE(p = 0.23;95%CI-1.55 至 0.39;d = 0.60)和内部负荷(p = 0.73;95%CI-0.77 至 1.09;d = 0.17)。我们的数据表明,tDCS 可以急性优化 5000 米跑步运动员的时间和速度。然而,Pt 和 RPE 没有变化。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/36c5/10250526/ac864217d26e/41598_2023_36093_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/36c5/10250526/dafd1e37ed73/41598_2023_36093_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/36c5/10250526/5183e37c83dc/41598_2023_36093_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/36c5/10250526/c1dc5ae574b8/41598_2023_36093_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/36c5/10250526/0e01eb436823/41598_2023_36093_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/36c5/10250526/9f3f11fe1127/41598_2023_36093_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/36c5/10250526/bc879a78ff88/41598_2023_36093_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/36c5/10250526/fcc98c68fd91/41598_2023_36093_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/36c5/10250526/ac864217d26e/41598_2023_36093_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/36c5/10250526/dafd1e37ed73/41598_2023_36093_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/36c5/10250526/5183e37c83dc/41598_2023_36093_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/36c5/10250526/c1dc5ae574b8/41598_2023_36093_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/36c5/10250526/0e01eb436823/41598_2023_36093_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/36c5/10250526/9f3f11fe1127/41598_2023_36093_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/36c5/10250526/bc879a78ff88/41598_2023_36093_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/36c5/10250526/fcc98c68fd91/41598_2023_36093_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/36c5/10250526/ac864217d26e/41598_2023_36093_Fig8_HTML.jpg

相似文献

[1]
Acute effects of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on peak torque and 5000 m running performance: a randomized controlled trial.

Sci Rep. 2023-6-8

[2]
Does Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation reduce central and peripheral muscle fatigue in recreational runners? A triple-blind, sham-controlled, randomized, crossover clinical study.

Braz J Phys Ther. 2024

[3]
Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation of motor cortex enhances running performance.

PLoS One. 2019-2-22

[4]
Effects of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation over lower limb primary motor cortex on motor learning in healthy individuals.

Eur J Neurosci. 2018-3-6

[5]
Transcranial direct current stimulation and repeated sprint ability: No effect on sprint performance or ratings of perceived exertion.

Eur J Sport Sci. 2022-4

[6]
Transcranial direct current stimulation during a prolonged cognitive task: the effect on cognitive and shooting performances in professional female basketball players.

Ergonomics. 2023-4

[7]
Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation increases corticospinal excitability, while performance is unchanged.

PLoS One. 2021

[8]
Acute effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on cycling and running performance. A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Eur J Sport Sci. 2022-2

[9]
Effect of transcranial direct current stimulation on sports performance for two profiles of athletes (power and endurance) (COMPETE): a protocol for a randomised, crossover, double blind, controlled exploratory trial.

Trials. 2020-6-3

[10]
Transcranial direct current stimulation of the premotor cortex: effects on hand dexterity.

Brain Res. 2014-8-12

引用本文的文献

[1]
Rating of perceived exertion in continuous sports: a scoping review with evidence gap map.

Front Sports Act Living. 2025-7-15

本文引用的文献

[1]
Effects of High-Intensity Warm-Up on 5000-Meter Performance Time in Trained Long-Distance Runners.

J Sports Sci Med. 2023-6

[2]
Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Does Not Affect Sprint Performance or the Horizontal Force-Velocity Profile.

Res Q Exerc Sport. 2022-9

[3]
Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Muscle Fatigue in Recreational Runners: Randomized, Sham-Controlled, Triple-Blind, Crossover Study-Protocol Study.

Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2022-3-1

[4]
Transcranial direct current stimulation and repeated sprint ability: No effect on sprint performance or ratings of perceived exertion.

Eur J Sport Sci. 2022-4

[5]
Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Does Not Improve Countermovement Jump Performance in Young Healthy Men.

J Strength Cond Res. 2021-10-1

[6]
Bi-hemispheric anodal transcranial direct current stimulation worsens taekwondo-related performance.

Hum Mov Sci. 2019-8

[7]
Increase in prefrontal cortex oxygenation during static muscular endurance performance is modulated by self-regulation strategies.

Sci Rep. 2018-10-25

[8]
Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Psychophysiological Responses to Maximal Incremental Exercise Test in Recreational Endurance Runners.

Front Psychol. 2018-10-9

[9]
Anodal and cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation can decrease force output of knee extensors during an intermittent MVC fatiguing task in young healthy male participants.

J Neurosci Res. 2018-4-26

[10]
Bilateral extracephalic transcranial direct current stimulation improves endurance performance in healthy individuals.

Brain Stimul. 2018

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索