Baldari Carlo, Buzzachera Cosme F, Vitor-Costa Marcelo, Gabardo Juliano M, Bernardes Andrea G, Altimari Leandro R, Guidetti Laura
eCampus University, Novedrate, Italy.
Department of Physical Education, North University of Paraná, Londrina, Brazil.
Front Psychol. 2018 Oct 9;9:1867. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01867. eCollection 2018.
Previous studies have suggested that transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) might improve exercise performance and alter psychophysiological responses to exercise. However, it is presently unknown whether this simple technique has similar (or greater) effects on running performance. The purpose of this study was, therefore, to test the hypothesis that, compared with sham and cathodal tDCS, anodal tDCS applied over the M1 region would attenuate perception of effort, improve affective valence, and enhance exercise tolerance, regardless of changes in physiological responses, during maximal incremental exercise. In a double-blind, randomized, counterbalanced design, 13 healthy recreational endurance runners, aged 20-42 years, volunteered to participate in this study. On three separate occasions, the subjects performed an incremental ramp exercise test from rest to volitional exhaustion on a motor-driven treadmill following 20-min of brain stimulation with either placebo tDCS (sham) or real tDCS (cathodal and anodal). Breath-by-breath pulmonary gas exchange and ventilation and indices of muscle hemodynamics and oxygenation were collected continuously during the ramp exercise test. Ratings of perceived exertion (RPE) and affective valence in response to the ramp exercise test were also measured. Compared with sham, neither anodal tDCS nor cathodal tDCS altered the physiological responses to exercise ( > 0.05). Similarly, RPE and affective responses during the incremental ramp exercise test did not differ between the three experimental conditions at any time ( > 0.05). The exercise tolerance was also not significantly different following brain stimulation with either sham (533 ± 46 s) or real tDCS (anodal tDCS: 530 ± 44 s, and cathodal tDCS: 537 ± 40 s; > 0.05). These results demonstrate that acute tDCS applied over the M1 region did not alter physiological responses, perceived exertion, affective valence, or exercise performance in recreational endurance runners.
以往的研究表明,经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)可能会提高运动表现,并改变对运动的心理生理反应。然而,目前尚不清楚这种简单的技术对跑步表现是否有类似(或更大)的影响。因此,本研究的目的是检验以下假设:与假刺激和阴极tDCS相比,在最大递增运动期间,应用于M1区域的阳极tDCS将减弱努力感知、改善情感效价并提高运动耐力,而不考虑生理反应的变化。在一项双盲、随机、平衡设计中,13名年龄在20 - 42岁的健康休闲耐力跑者自愿参与本研究。在三个不同的场合,受试者在接受20分钟的安慰剂tDCS(假刺激)或真正的tDCS(阴极和阳极)脑刺激后,在电动跑步机上进行从静息到自主疲劳的递增斜坡运动测试。在斜坡运动测试期间持续收集逐次呼吸的肺气体交换和通气以及肌肉血液动力学和氧合指标。还测量了对斜坡运动测试的主观用力感觉(RPE)和情感效价。与假刺激相比,阳极tDCS和阴极tDCS均未改变对运动的生理反应(>0.05)。同样,在递增斜坡运动测试期间,三种实验条件下的RPE和情感反应在任何时候均无差异(>0.05)。在接受假刺激(5