• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

单对比度卷积神经网络模型使用八对比度磁共振图像进行颅骨剥离的准确性。

Accuracy of skull stripping in a single-contrast convolutional neural network model using eight-contrast magnetic resonance images.

机构信息

Department of Radiological Technology, Faculty of Health Science, Juntendo University, 2-1-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8421, Japan.

Department of Radiology, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

Radiol Phys Technol. 2023 Sep;16(3):373-383. doi: 10.1007/s12194-023-00728-z. Epub 2023 Jun 8.

DOI:10.1007/s12194-023-00728-z
PMID:37291372
Abstract

In automated analyses of brain morphometry, skull stripping or brain extraction is a critical first step because it provides accurate spatial registration and signal-intensity normalization. Therefore, it is imperative to develop an ideal skull-stripping method in the field of brain image analysis. Previous reports have shown that convolutional neural network (CNN) method is better at skull stripping than non-CNN methods. We aimed to evaluate the accuracy of skull stripping in a single-contrast CNN model using eight-contrast magnetic resonance (MR) images. A total of 12 healthy participants and 12 patients with a clinical diagnosis of unilateral Sturge-Weber syndrome were included in our study. A 3-T MR imaging system and QRAPMASTER were used for data acquisition. We obtained eight-contrast images produced by post-processing T1, T2, and proton density (PD) maps. To evaluate the accuracy of skull stripping in our CNN method, gold-standard intracranial volume (ICV) masks were used to train the CNN model. The ICV masks were defined by experts using manual tracing. The accuracy of the intracranial volume obtained from the single-contrast CNN model (ICV) was evaluated using the Dice similarity coefficient [= 2(ICV ⋂ ICV)/(ICV + ICV)]. Our study showed significantly higher accuracy in the PD-weighted image (WI), phase-sensitive inversion recovery (PSIR), and PD-short tau inversion recovery (STIR) compared to the other three contrast images (T1-WI, T2-fluid-attenuated inversion recovery [FLAIR], and T1-FLAIR). In conclusion, PD-WI, PSIR, and PD-STIR should be used instead of T1-WI for skull stripping in the CNN models.

摘要

在自动脑形态计量分析中,颅骨剥离或脑提取是至关重要的第一步,因为它提供了准确的空间配准和信号强度归一化。因此,在脑图像分析领域开发一种理想的颅骨剥离方法是当务之急。先前的报告表明,卷积神经网络(CNN)方法比非 CNN 方法更擅长颅骨剥离。我们旨在评估单对比度 CNN 模型在使用 8 种对比度磁共振(MR)图像进行颅骨剥离的准确性。本研究共纳入 12 名健康受试者和 12 名单侧斯特奇-韦伯综合征的临床诊断患者。使用 3T MR 成像系统和 QRAPMASTER 进行数据采集。我们获得了通过 T1、T2 和质子密度(PD)图后处理生成的 8 种对比度图像。为了评估我们的 CNN 方法中颅骨剥离的准确性,使用金标准颅内体积(ICV)掩模来训练 CNN 模型。ICV 掩模由专家使用手动追踪定义。使用 Dice 相似系数[=2(ICV ⋂ ICV)/(ICV+ICV)]评估单对比度 CNN 模型(ICV)获得的颅内体积的准确性。我们的研究表明,与其他三种对比图像(T1-WI、T2 液体衰减反转恢复[FLAIR]和 T1-FLAIR)相比,PD 加权图像(WI)、相位敏感反转恢复(PSIR)和 PD 短 tau 反转恢复(STIR)的准确性显著更高。总之,在 CNN 模型中,PD-WI、PSIR 和 PD-STIR 应该代替 T1-WI 用于颅骨剥离。

相似文献

1
Accuracy of skull stripping in a single-contrast convolutional neural network model using eight-contrast magnetic resonance images.单对比度卷积神经网络模型使用八对比度磁共振图像进行颅骨剥离的准确性。
Radiol Phys Technol. 2023 Sep;16(3):373-383. doi: 10.1007/s12194-023-00728-z. Epub 2023 Jun 8.
2
Effect of changing the analyzed image contrast on the accuracy of intracranial volume extraction using Brain Extraction Tool 2.使用脑提取工具2改变分析图像对比度对颅内体积提取准确性的影响。
Radiol Phys Technol. 2020 Mar;13(1):76-82. doi: 10.1007/s12194-019-00551-5. Epub 2020 Jan 2.
3
Convolutional neural networks for skull-stripping in brain MR imaging using silver standard masks.基于银标准掩模的磁共振脑成像中颅骨剥离的卷积神经网络。
Artif Intell Med. 2019 Jul;98:48-58. doi: 10.1016/j.artmed.2019.06.008. Epub 2019 Jul 23.
4
Robust skull stripping using multiple MR image contrasts insensitive to pathology.使用对病变不敏感的多个磁共振图像对比度进行稳健的颅骨剥离。
Neuroimage. 2017 Feb 1;146:132-147. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.11.017. Epub 2016 Nov 15.
5
A multi-view pyramid network for skull stripping on neonatal T1-weighted MRI.多视图金字塔网络用于新生儿 T1 加权 MRI 的颅骨剥离。
Magn Reson Imaging. 2019 Nov;63:70-79. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2019.08.025. Epub 2019 Aug 16.
6
A general skull stripping of multiparametric brain MRIs using 3D convolutional neural network.使用三维卷积神经网络对多参数脑 MRI 进行一般性颅骨剥离。
Sci Rep. 2022 Jun 27;12(1):10826. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-14983-4.
7
Deep Learning for Automatic Differential Diagnosis of Primary Central Nervous System Lymphoma and Glioblastoma: Multi-Parametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Based Convolutional Neural Network Model.深度学习在原发性中枢神经系统淋巴瘤和胶质母细胞瘤自动鉴别诊断中的应用:基于多参数磁共振成像的卷积神经网络模型。
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2021 Sep;54(3):880-887. doi: 10.1002/jmri.27592. Epub 2021 Mar 11.
8
Automated identification of piglet brain tissue from MRI images using Region-based Convolutional Neural Networks.基于区域卷积神经网络的 MRI 图像中小猪脑组织的自动识别。
PLoS One. 2023 May 11;18(5):e0284951. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0284951. eCollection 2023.
9
Convolutional neural network-based approach for segmentation of left ventricle myocardial scar from 3D late gadolinium enhancement MR images.基于卷积神经网络的方法用于从 3D 晚期钆增强磁共振图像中分割左心室心肌瘢痕。
Med Phys. 2019 Apr;46(4):1740-1751. doi: 10.1002/mp.13436. Epub 2019 Feb 28.
10
Deep MRI brain extraction: A 3D convolutional neural network for skull stripping.深度磁共振成像脑部提取:一种用于去除颅骨的3D卷积神经网络。
Neuroimage. 2016 Apr 1;129:460-469. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.01.024. Epub 2016 Jan 22.

本文引用的文献

1
Advantages of Using Both Voxel- and Surface-based Morphometry in Cortical Morphology Analysis: A Review of Various Applications.基于体素和基于表面的形态测量学在皮质形态分析中的优势:各种应用的综述。
Magn Reson Med Sci. 2022 Mar 1;21(1):41-57. doi: 10.2463/mrms.rev.2021-0096. Epub 2022 Feb 18.
2
Comparison of Two-Dimensional- and Three-Dimensional-Based U-Net Architectures for Brain Tissue Classification in One-Dimensional Brain CT.基于二维和三维的U-Net架构在一维脑CT脑组织分类中的比较
Front Comput Neurosci. 2022 Jan 10;15:785244. doi: 10.3389/fncom.2021.785244. eCollection 2021.
3
3D U-Net Improves Automatic Brain Extraction for Isotropic Rat Brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging Data.
3D U-Net改进了各向同性大鼠脑磁共振成像数据的自动脑提取。
Front Neurosci. 2021 Dec 16;15:801008. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2021.801008. eCollection 2021.
4
Convolutional Neural Net Learning Can Achieve Production-Level Brain Segmentation in Structural Magnetic Resonance Imaging.卷积神经网络学习可在结构磁共振成像中实现生产级别的脑部分割。
Front Neurosci. 2021 Jun 21;15:683426. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2021.683426. eCollection 2021.
5
Assessing the Accuracy and Reproducibility of PARIETAL: A Deep Learning Brain Extraction Algorithm.评估 PARIETAL:一种深度学习脑提取算法的准确性和可重复性。
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2024 Jun;59(6):1991-2000. doi: 10.1002/jmri.27776. Epub 2021 Jun 16.
6
Improved Segmentation of the Intracranial and Ventricular Volumes in Populations with Cerebrovascular Lesions and Atrophy Using 3D CNNs.使用 3D CNN 提高脑血管病变和萎缩患者颅内和脑室容积的分割。
Neuroinformatics. 2021 Oct;19(4):597-618. doi: 10.1007/s12021-021-09510-1. Epub 2021 Feb 1.
7
Automated joint skull-stripping and segmentation with Multi-Task U-Net in large mouse brain MRI databases.基于多任务 U-Net 的大型鼠脑 MRI 数据库的自动关节颅骨剥离和分割。
Neuroimage. 2021 Apr 1;229:117734. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.117734. Epub 2021 Jan 14.
8
Estimation of intracranial volume: A comparative study between synthetic MRI and FSL-brain extraction tool (BET)2.颅内容积评估:合成 MRI 与 FSL 脑提取工具(BET)2 的对比研究。
J Clin Neurosci. 2020 Sep;79:178-182. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2020.07.024. Epub 2020 Aug 6.
9
Multi-view secondary input collaborative deep learning for lung nodule 3D segmentation.多视图二次输入协同深度学习的肺结节 3D 分割。
Cancer Imaging. 2020 Aug 1;20(1):53. doi: 10.1186/s40644-020-00331-0.
10
Skull-Stripping of Glioblastoma MRI Scans Using 3D Deep Learning.使用3D深度学习对胶质母细胞瘤MRI扫描进行颅骨剥离
Brainlesion. 2019 Oct;11992:57-68. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-46640-4_6. Epub 2020 May 19.