• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

与医学生课堂评估相关的教师因素:一项纵向分析。

Instructor factors associated with medical students' lecture evaluation: a longitudinal analysis.

机构信息

Department of Medical Education, Dankook University College of Medicine, Cheonan, Korea.

Department of Health Administration, College of Health Science, Dankook University, Cheonan, Korea.

出版信息

Korean J Med Educ. 2023 Jun;35(2):165-174. doi: 10.3946/kjme.2023.257. Epub 2023 Jun 1.

DOI:10.3946/kjme.2023.257
PMID:37291845
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10258359/
Abstract

PURPOSE

This study identified factors that affect lecture evaluation by analyzing sophomores from Dankook University, examining each cluster's characteristics, and comparing differences among trajectories.

METHODS

This study identified factors that affect lecture evaluation by analyzing sophomores from Dankook University, examining each cluster's characteristics, and comparing differences among trajectories.

RESULTS

The lecture evaluation score decreased as the teaching hours per instructor in a year increased by an hour, and the number of instructors per lecture increased by one individual. During trajectory analysis, the first trajectory had lower lecture evaluation scores overall but relatively high appropriateness of the textbook and punctuality of class, whereas the second trajectory had higher lecture evaluation scores overall for all four items.

CONCLUSION

The two trajectories showed differences in teaching methods (understanding of lecture content and usefulness of the lecture) rather than in external factors (appropriateness of the textbook and punctuality of class). Therefore, to improve lecture satisfaction, enhancing instructors' instructional competencies through lectures and adjusting the teaching hours by assigning an adequate number of instructors per lecture are recommended.

摘要

目的

本研究通过分析檀国大学的大二学生,分析影响讲座评估的因素,考察每个聚类的特征,并比较轨迹之间的差异,从而确定影响讲座评估的因素。

方法

本研究通过分析檀国大学的大二学生,分析影响讲座评估的因素,考察每个聚类的特征,并比较轨迹之间的差异,从而确定影响讲座评估的因素。

结果

随着每年每位教师的教学时间增加一个小时,以及每节课的教师人数增加一个人,讲座评估分数下降。在轨迹分析中,第一轨迹的整体讲座评估分数较低,但教科书的适用性和课程的准时性相对较高,而第二轨迹的整体四个项目的讲座评估分数较高。

结论

这两个轨迹在教学方法(对讲座内容的理解和讲座的有用性)上存在差异,而不是在外部因素(教科书的适用性和课程的准时性)上存在差异。因此,为了提高讲座满意度,建议通过讲座提高教师的教学能力,并通过为每节课分配足够数量的教师来调整教学时间。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8c87/10258359/a9c848d7345d/kjme-2023-257f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8c87/10258359/a9c848d7345d/kjme-2023-257f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8c87/10258359/a9c848d7345d/kjme-2023-257f1.jpg

相似文献

1
Instructor factors associated with medical students' lecture evaluation: a longitudinal analysis.与医学生课堂评估相关的教师因素:一项纵向分析。
Korean J Med Educ. 2023 Jun;35(2):165-174. doi: 10.3946/kjme.2023.257. Epub 2023 Jun 1.
2
Effects of lecture fluency and instructor experience on students' judgments of learning, test scores, and evaluations of instructors.演讲流畅度和教师经验对学生学习判断、考试成绩和教师评价的影响。
J Exp Psychol Appl. 2020 Mar;26(1):26-39. doi: 10.1037/xap0000234. Epub 2019 Jun 6.
3
Is lecture dead? A preliminary study of medical students' evaluation of teaching methods in the preclinical curriculum.讲座式教学已死?一项关于医学生对临床前课程教学方法评价的初步研究。
Int J Med Educ. 2017 Sep 22;8:326-333. doi: 10.5116/ijme.59b9.5f40.
4
Comparison of didactic lectures and open-group discussions in surgical teaching.外科教学中讲授式讲座与开放式小组讨论的比较。
J Med Assoc Thai. 2014 Nov;97 Suppl 11:S140-4.
5
Validating dental and medical students' evaluations of faculty teaching in an integrated, multi-instructor course.验证牙科和医学专业学生对综合多教师课程中教师教学的评价。
J Dent Educ. 2005 Jun;69(6):663-70.
6
Effect of immediate student evaluations on a multi-instructor course.即时学生评价对多教师授课课程的影响。
J Med Educ. 1983 Mar;58(3):172-8. doi: 10.1097/00001888-198303000-00002.
7
Does instructor evaluation by students using a WEB-based questionnaire impact instructor performance?学生使用基于网络的问卷对教师进行评估会影响教师的表现吗?
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2005;10(1):5-13. doi: 10.1007/s10459-004-0943-7.
8
Effectiveness of an adult-learning, self-directed model compared with traditional lecture-based teaching methods in out-of-hospital training.与传统的基于讲座的教学方法相比,成人学习、自主学习模式在院外培训中的有效性。
Acad Emerg Med. 2004 Jan;11(1):33-7. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2003.08.012.
9
The impact of lecture attendance and other variables on how medical students evaluate faculty in a preclinical program.讲座出勤和其他变量对医学生如何评估临床前课程教师的影响。
Acad Med. 2013 Jul;88(7):972-7. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e318294e99a.
10
Electronic voting to encourage interactive lectures: a randomised trial.电子投票促进互动式讲座:一项随机试验
BMC Med Educ. 2007 Jul 27;7:25. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-7-25.

本文引用的文献

1
Analysis and suggestions on medical educators' roles.医学教育者角色的分析与建议。
Korean J Med Educ. 2021 Dec;33(4):411-417. doi: 10.3946/kjme.2021.209. Epub 2021 Nov 30.
2
Lessons learned about integrating a medical school curriculum: perceptions of students, faculty and curriculum leaders.关于整合医学院课程的经验教训:学生、教师和课程领导者的看法。
Med Educ. 2008 Aug;42(8):778-85. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2008.03110.x.
3
AMEE Guide no. 34: Teaching in the clinical environment.《医学教育与实践指南》第34号:临床环境中的教学
Med Teach. 2008;30(4):347-64. doi: 10.1080/01421590802061613.