Public Health Nutrition, Institute of Nutrition, Consumption and Health, Paderborn University, Paderborn33098, Germany.
Department of Life Sciences, University of Applied Sciences Albstadt-Sigmaringen, Sigmaringen, Germany.
Public Health Nutr. 2023 Sep;26(9):1896-1906. doi: 10.1017/S1368980023001118. Epub 2023 Jun 9.
To systematically review the impact of choice architecture interventions (CAI) on the food choice of healthy adolescents in a secondary school setting. Factors potentially contributing to the effectiveness of CAI types and numbers implemented and its long-term success were examined.
PUBMED and Web of Science were systematically searched in October 2021. Publications were included following predefined inclusion criteria and grouped according to the number and duration of implemented interventions. Intervention impact was determined by a systematic description of the reported quantitative changes in food choice and/or consumption. Intervention types were compared with regard to food selection and sustained effects either during or following the intervention.
CAI on food choice of healthy adolescents in secondary schools.
Not applicable.
Fourteen studies were included; four randomised controlled trials and five each of controlled or uncontrolled pre-post design, respectively. Four studies implemented a single CAI type, with ten implementing > 1. Three studies investigated CAI effects over the course of a school year either by continuous or repeated data collection, while ten studies' schools were visited on selected days during an intervention. Twelve studies reported desired changes in overall food selection, yet effects were not always significant and appeared less conclusive for longer-term studies.
This review found promising evidence that CAI can be effective in encouraging favourable food choices in healthy adolescents in a secondary school setting. However, further studies designed to evaluate complex interventions are needed.
系统评价选择架构干预(CAI)对中学健康青少年食物选择的影响。研究考察了影响 CAI 类型和数量实施效果及其长期成功的潜在因素。
2021 年 10 月,系统检索了 PUBMED 和 Web of Science。根据预先设定的纳入标准,对出版物进行了分组,并根据实施干预的数量和持续时间进行了分组。通过系统描述报告的食物选择和/或消费的定量变化来确定干预的影响。干预类型根据食物选择和在干预期间或之后的持续效果进行了比较。
中学健康青少年的食物选择 CAI。
不适用。
纳入了 14 项研究;其中 4 项为随机对照试验,5 项分别为对照或未对照的前后设计。4 项研究实施了单一的 CAI 类型,10 项研究实施了超过 1 种。3 项研究在一学年内通过连续或重复数据收集来调查 CAI 效果,而 10 项研究在干预期间选择特定日期访问学校。12 项研究报告了对整体食物选择的期望变化,但效果并不总是显著,而且对于长期研究,效果似乎不太明确。
本综述发现了有希望的证据表明,CAI 可以有效鼓励中学健康青少年做出有利的食物选择。然而,需要进一步设计研究来评估复杂的干预措施。