Cardiovascular Medicine Division, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Department of Internal Medicine, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, New York, USA.
JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2023 Aug;9(8 Pt 2):1464-1474. doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2023.05.013. Epub 2023 May 18.
Regional myocardial conduction velocity (CV) dispersion has not been studied in postinfarct patients with ventricular tachycardia (VT).
This study sought to compare the following: 1) the association of CV dispersion vs repolarization dispersion with VT circuit sites; and 2) myocardial lipomatous metaplasia (LM) vs fibrosis as the anatomic substrate for CV dispersion.
Among 33 postinfarct patients with VT, we characterized dense and border zone infarct tissue by late gadolinium enhancement cardiac magnetic resonance, and LM by computed tomography, with both images registered with electroanatomic maps. Activation recovery interval (ARI) was the time interval from the minimum derivative within the QRS complex to the maximum derivative within the T-wave on unipolar electrograms. CV at each EAM point was the mean CV between that point and 5 adjacent points along the activation wave front. CV and ARI dispersion were the coefficient of variation (CoV) of CV and ARI per American Heart Association (AHA) segment, respectively.
Regional CV dispersion exhibited a much larger range than ARI dispersion, with median 0.65 vs 0.24; P < 0.001. CV dispersion was a more robust predictor of the number of critical VT sites per AHA segment than ARI dispersion. Regional LM area was more strongly associated with CV dispersion than fibrosis area. LM area was larger (median 0.44 vs 0.20 cm; P < 0.001) in AHA segments with mean CV <36 cm/s and CoV_CV >0.65 than those with mean CV <36 cm/s and CoV_CV <0.65.
Regional CV dispersion more strongly predicts VT circuit sites than repolarization dispersion, and LM is a critical substrate for CV dispersion.
区域性心肌传导速度(CV)离散度尚未在伴有室性心动过速(VT)的心肌梗死后患者中进行研究。
本研究旨在比较以下两种情况:1)CV 离散度与复极离散度与 VT 环路部位的关系;2)心肌脂肪化生(LM)与纤维化作为 CV 离散度的解剖学基础。
在 33 例伴有 VT 的心肌梗死后患者中,我们通过心脏磁共振晚期钆增强成像来描述致密和边缘带梗死组织,通过计算机断层扫描来描述 LM,并将这两种图像与电解剖图进行配准。复极恢复间期(ARI)是 QRS 波群内最小导数到单极电图 T 波内最大导数之间的时间间隔。每个 EAM 点的 CV 是该点与激活波前的 5 个相邻点之间的平均 CV。CV 和 ARI 离散度分别是 CV 和 ARI 每段美国心脏协会(AHA)的变异系数(CoV)。
区域性 CV 离散度的范围明显大于 ARI 离散度,中位数分别为 0.65 和 0.24;P<0.001。CV 离散度比 ARI 离散度更能预测每个 AHA 段的关键 VT 部位数量。区域性 LM 面积与 CV 离散度的相关性强于纤维化面积。在平均 CV<36cm/s 和 CoV_CV>0.65 的 AHA 段,LM 面积较大(中位数分别为 0.44 和 0.20cm;P<0.001),而在平均 CV<36cm/s 和 CoV_CV<0.65 的 AHA 段,LM 面积较小。
区域性 CV 离散度比复极离散度更能预测 VT 环路部位,LM 是 CV 离散度的关键基质。