Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio.
Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio.
J Surg Educ. 2023 Nov;80(11):1711-1716. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2023.05.008. Epub 2023 Jun 7.
Robotic-assisted surgery is an increasing part of general surgery training, but resident autonomy on the robotic platform can be hard to quantify. Robotic console time (RCT), the percentage of time the resident controls the console, may be an appropriate measure of resident operative autonomy. This study aims to characterize the correlation between objective resident RCT and subjectively scored operative autonomy.
Using a validated resident performance evaluation instrument, we collected resident operative autonomy ratings from residents and attendings performing robotic cholecystectomy (RC) and robotic inguinal hernia repair (IH) at a university-based general surgery program between 9/2020-6/2021. We then extracted RCT data from the Intuitive surgical system. Descriptive statistics, t-tests and ANOVA were performed.
A total of 31 robotic operations (13 RC, 18 IH) performed by 4 attending surgeons and 8 residents (4 junior, 4 senior) were matched and included. 83.9% of cases were scored by both attending and resident. The average RCT per case was 35.6%(95% CI 13.0%,58.3%) for junior residents (PGY 2-3) and 59.7%(CI 51.1%,68.3%) for senior residents (PGY 4-5). The mean autonomy evaluated by residents was 3.29(CI 2.85,3.73) out of a maximum score of 5, while the mean autonomy evaluated by attendings was 4.12(CI 3.68,4.55). RCT significantly correlated with subjective evaluations of resident autonomy (r=0.61, p=0.0003). RCT also moderately correlated with resident training level (r=0.5306, p<0.0001). Neither attending robotic experience nor operation type significantly correlated with RCT or autonomy evaluation scores.
Our study suggests that resident console time is a valid surrogate for resident operative autonomy in robotic cholecystectomy and inguinal hernia repair. RCT may be a valuable measure in objective assessment of residents' operative autonomy and training efficiency. Future investigation into how RCT correlates with subjective and objective autonomy metrics such as verbal guidance or distinguishing critical operative steps is needed to validate the study findings further.
机器人辅助手术是普通外科培训中越来越重要的一部分,但住院医师在机器人平台上的自主性很难量化。机器人控制台时间(RCT),即住院医师控制控制台的时间百分比,可能是衡量住院医师手术自主性的适当指标。本研究旨在描述客观的住院医师 RCT 与主观评分的手术自主性之间的相关性。
使用经过验证的住院医师绩效评估工具,我们从在一所大学普外科进行机器人胆囊切除术(RC)和机器人腹股沟疝修补术(IH)的住院医师和主治医生那里收集了手术自主性评分。然后,我们从直觉手术系统中提取了 RCT 数据。进行了描述性统计、t 检验和 ANOVA。
共匹配了 4 名主治医生和 8 名住院医师(4 名初级住院医师,4 名高级住院医师)进行的 31 例机器人手术(13 例 RC,18 例 IH)。83.9%的病例由主治医生和住院医师共同评分。初级住院医师(PGY 2-3)每例平均 RCT 为 35.6%(95%CI 13.0%,58.3%),而高级住院医师(PGY 4-5)每例平均 RCT 为 59.7%(CI 51.1%,68.3%)。住院医师评估的平均自主性为 3.29(CI 2.85,3.73),最高得分为 5 分,而主治医生评估的平均自主性为 4.12(CI 3.68,4.55)。RCT 与住院医师自主性的主观评估显著相关(r=0.61,p=0.0003)。RCT 还与住院医师培训水平中度相关(r=0.5306,p<0.0001)。主治医生的机器人经验或手术类型与 RCT 或自主性评估评分均无显著相关性。
我们的研究表明,住院医师控制台时间是机器人胆囊切除术和腹股沟疝修补术中住院医师手术自主性的有效替代指标。RCT 可能是评估住院医师手术自主性和培训效率的有效指标。需要进一步研究 RCT 与主观和客观自主性指标(如口头指导或区分关键手术步骤)的相关性,以进一步验证研究结果。