Mushari Nouf A, Soultanidis Georgios, Duff Lisa, Trivieri Maria G, Fayad Zahi A, Robson Philip M, Tsoumpas Charalampos
Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK.
BioMedical Engineering and Imaging Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA.
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 May 26;13(11):1865. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13111865.
The aim of this study is to explore the utility of cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging of radiomic features to distinguish active and inactive cardiac sarcoidosis (CS).
Subjects were classified into active cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) and inactive cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) based on PET-CMR imaging. CS was classified as featuring patchy [F]fluorodeoxyglucose ([F]FDG) uptake on PET and presence of late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) on CMR, while CS was classified as featuring no [F]FDG uptake in the presence of LGE on CMR. Among those screened, thirty CS and thirty-one CS patients met these criteria. A total of 94 radiomic features were subsequently extracted using PyRadiomics. The values of individual features were compared between CS and CS using the Mann-Whitney U test. Subsequently, machine learning (ML) approaches were tested. ML was applied to two sub-sets of radiomic features (signatures A and B) that were selected by logistic regression and PCA, respectively.
Univariate analysis of individual features showed no significant differences. Of all features, gray level co-occurrence matrix (GLCM) joint entropy had a good area under the curve (AUC) and accuracy with the smallest confidence interval, suggesting it may be a good target for further investigation. Some ML classifiers achieved reasonable discrimination between CS and CS patients. With signature A, support vector machine and k-neighbors showed good performance with AUC (0.77 and 0.73) and accuracy (0.67 and 0.72), respectively. With signature B, decision tree demonstrated AUC and accuracy around 0.7; Conclusion: CMR radiomic analysis in CS provides promising results to distinguish patients with active and inactive disease.
本研究旨在探讨心脏磁共振(CMR)成像的放射组学特征在区分活动性和非活动性心脏结节病(CS)方面的效用。
根据PET-CMR成像将受试者分为活动性心脏结节病(CS)和非活动性心脏结节病(CS)。CS被分类为PET上有斑片状[F]氟脱氧葡萄糖([F]FDG)摄取且CMR上有延迟钆增强(LGE),而CS被分类为CMR上有LGE但无[F]FDG摄取。在筛选出的患者中,30例CS患者和31例CS患者符合这些标准。随后使用PyRadiomics提取了总共94个放射组学特征。使用Mann-Whitney U检验比较CS和CS之间个体特征的值。随后,测试了机器学习(ML)方法。ML分别应用于通过逻辑回归和主成分分析(PCA)选择的两个放射组学特征子集(特征集A和B)。
个体特征的单变量分析显示无显著差异。在所有特征中,灰度共生矩阵(GLCM)联合熵具有良好的曲线下面积(AUC)和最小置信区间的准确性,表明它可能是进一步研究的良好靶点。一些ML分类器在CS和CS患者之间实现了合理的区分。对于特征集A,支持向量机和k近邻分别表现出良好的性能,AUC分别为0.77和0.73,准确性分别为0.67和0.72。对于特征集B,决策树的AUC和准确性约为0.7。结论:CS中的CMR放射组学分析为区分活动性和非活动性疾病患者提供了有前景的结果。