Graduate School of Nursing Science, St. Luke's International University, Tokyo 104-0044, Japan.
Makita General Hospital, Tokyo 144-8501, Japan.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jun 2;20(11):6042. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20116042.
The use of a decision aid for choosing whether to have or not have anesthesia during childbirth has been shown to increase both knowledge about birth and the proportion of women who made their own decisions compared with women who did not use a decision aid. Herein, we updated the first version of our decision aid into a second version and evaluated this updated decision aid. We evaluated the face validity and content appropriateness of the updated decision aid developed to enhance the ability of women to choose between childbirth with or without epidural analgesia.
This was a descriptive study based on a literature review of updated information for addition to the first version. PubMed and Cochrane Library were searched from 2003 to May 2021. Thereafter, obstetricians, anesthesiologists, and midwives were asked to respond to a questionnaire regarding the face validity and content appropriateness of the updated decision aid regarding whether it meets the IPDASi (Version 4.0) quality standards.
One obstetrician, one anesthesiologist, and three midwives who had performed epidural anesthesia for at least three years responded to the questionnaire. The responses to the evaluation items of face validity (i.e., style and clarity) were positive. There were 38 specific comments regarding content appropriateness classified into seven categories: "addition or revision of text", "unification of expressions", "need for explanation/information", "lack of evidence", "potential to mislead", "questionable", and "structure".
The face validity and content appropriateness of the updated decision aid was confirmed. The next step is evaluation of the updated decision aid by pregnant women who give birth.
使用决策辅助工具来选择是否在分娩时使用麻醉,已被证明可以提高产妇对分娩的了解程度,并增加自行决策的产妇比例,而不是使用决策辅助工具的产妇。在此,我们对我们的决策辅助工具进行了首次更新,开发了第二个版本,并对其进行了评估。我们评估了更新后的决策辅助工具的表面有效性和内容适当性,以增强女性在有无硬膜外镇痛的分娩之间进行选择的能力。
这是一项基于文献回顾的描述性研究,目的是更新第一版的信息。我们从 2003 年至 2021 年 5 月,在 PubMed 和 Cochrane Library 上进行了检索。此后,我们请产科医生、麻醉师和助产士回答一份关于更新后的决策辅助工具的表面有效性和内容适当性的问卷,以评估其是否符合 IPDASi(第 4.0 版)质量标准。
有一位产科医生、一位麻醉师和三位至少进行了三年硬膜外麻醉的助产士回答了问卷。对表面有效性(即风格和清晰度)的评价项目的回答是肯定的。内容适当性方面有 38 条具体意见,分为七类:“添加或修改文本”、“统一表达方式”、“需要解释/信息”、“缺乏证据”、“可能产生误导”、“有疑问”和“结构”。
更新后的决策辅助工具的表面有效性和内容适当性得到了确认。下一步是让分娩的孕妇对更新后的决策辅助工具进行评估。