Suppr超能文献

更新后的决策辅助工具使女性能够在分娩时选择使用或不使用硬膜外镇痛,并确认其有效性。

Updated Decision Aid Enabling Women to Choose between with or without Epidural Analgesia during Childbirth, and Confirmation of Validity.

机构信息

Graduate School of Nursing Science, St. Luke's International University, Tokyo 104-0044, Japan.

Makita General Hospital, Tokyo 144-8501, Japan.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jun 2;20(11):6042. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20116042.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The use of a decision aid for choosing whether to have or not have anesthesia during childbirth has been shown to increase both knowledge about birth and the proportion of women who made their own decisions compared with women who did not use a decision aid. Herein, we updated the first version of our decision aid into a second version and evaluated this updated decision aid. We evaluated the face validity and content appropriateness of the updated decision aid developed to enhance the ability of women to choose between childbirth with or without epidural analgesia.

METHODS

This was a descriptive study based on a literature review of updated information for addition to the first version. PubMed and Cochrane Library were searched from 2003 to May 2021. Thereafter, obstetricians, anesthesiologists, and midwives were asked to respond to a questionnaire regarding the face validity and content appropriateness of the updated decision aid regarding whether it meets the IPDASi (Version 4.0) quality standards.

RESULTS

One obstetrician, one anesthesiologist, and three midwives who had performed epidural anesthesia for at least three years responded to the questionnaire. The responses to the evaluation items of face validity (i.e., style and clarity) were positive. There were 38 specific comments regarding content appropriateness classified into seven categories: "addition or revision of text", "unification of expressions", "need for explanation/information", "lack of evidence", "potential to mislead", "questionable", and "structure".

CONCLUSION

The face validity and content appropriateness of the updated decision aid was confirmed. The next step is evaluation of the updated decision aid by pregnant women who give birth.

摘要

背景

使用决策辅助工具来选择是否在分娩时使用麻醉,已被证明可以提高产妇对分娩的了解程度,并增加自行决策的产妇比例,而不是使用决策辅助工具的产妇。在此,我们对我们的决策辅助工具进行了首次更新,开发了第二个版本,并对其进行了评估。我们评估了更新后的决策辅助工具的表面有效性和内容适当性,以增强女性在有无硬膜外镇痛的分娩之间进行选择的能力。

方法

这是一项基于文献回顾的描述性研究,目的是更新第一版的信息。我们从 2003 年至 2021 年 5 月,在 PubMed 和 Cochrane Library 上进行了检索。此后,我们请产科医生、麻醉师和助产士回答一份关于更新后的决策辅助工具的表面有效性和内容适当性的问卷,以评估其是否符合 IPDASi(第 4.0 版)质量标准。

结果

有一位产科医生、一位麻醉师和三位至少进行了三年硬膜外麻醉的助产士回答了问卷。对表面有效性(即风格和清晰度)的评价项目的回答是肯定的。内容适当性方面有 38 条具体意见,分为七类:“添加或修改文本”、“统一表达方式”、“需要解释/信息”、“缺乏证据”、“可能产生误导”、“有疑问”和“结构”。

结论

更新后的决策辅助工具的表面有效性和内容适当性得到了确认。下一步是让分娩的孕妇对更新后的决策辅助工具进行评估。

相似文献

2
[Women's motivations to give birth with or without epidural analgesia].[女性选择有无硬膜外镇痛分娩的动机]
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2013 Feb;42(1):56-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jgyn.2012.03.007. Epub 2012 May 3.
4
Maternal position in the second stage of labour for women with epidural anaesthesia.硬膜外麻醉产妇第二产程的体位
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Nov 9;11(11):CD008070. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008070.pub4.
5
Combined spinal-epidural versus epidural analgesia in labour.分娩时联合脊髓硬膜外麻醉与硬膜外镇痛的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Oct 17;10(10):CD003401. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003401.pub3.
7
Pushing/bearing down methods for the second stage of labour.第二产程的屏气/用力方法
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Mar 26;3(3):CD009124. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009124.pub3.

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验