• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

上消化道出血风险评分综述

A Review of Risk Scores within Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding.

作者信息

Orpen-Palmer Josh, Stanley Adrian J

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow G4 0SF, UK.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2023 May 26;12(11):3678. doi: 10.3390/jcm12113678.

DOI:10.3390/jcm12113678
PMID:37297873
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10253886/
Abstract

Upper gastrointestinal bleeding is a common medical emergency. Thorough initial assessment and appropriate resuscitation are essential to stabilise the patient. Risk scores provide an important tool to discriminate between lower- and higher-risk patients. Very low-risk patients can be safely discharged for out-patient management, while higher-risk patients can receive appropriate in-patient care. The Glasgow Blatchford Score, with a score of 0-1, performs best in the identification of very low-risk patients who will not require hospital based intervention or die, and is recommended by most guidelines to facilitate safe out-patient management. The performance of risk scores in the identification of specific adverse events to define high-risk patients is less accurate, with no individual score performing consistently well. Ongoing developments in the use of machine learning models and artificial intelligence in predicting poor outcomes in UGIB appear promising and will likely form the basis of dynamic risk assessment in the future.

摘要

上消化道出血是一种常见的医疗急症。全面的初始评估和适当的复苏对于稳定患者病情至关重要。风险评分是区分低风险和高风险患者的重要工具。极低风险的患者可以安全出院进行门诊管理,而高风险患者则可接受适当的住院治疗。格拉斯哥布拉奇福德评分(Glasgow Blatchford Score),评分范围为0至1,在识别不需要住院干预或死亡的极低风险患者方面表现最佳,大多数指南都推荐使用该评分以促进安全的门诊管理。风险评分在识别特定不良事件以定义高风险患者方面的表现不太准确,没有单一评分能始终表现良好。在利用机器学习模型和人工智能预测上消化道出血不良结局方面的持续进展似乎很有前景,并且可能会成为未来动态风险评估的基础。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a5e/10253886/75ad403aadd8/jcm-12-03678-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a5e/10253886/349d52b166e3/jcm-12-03678-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a5e/10253886/75ad403aadd8/jcm-12-03678-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a5e/10253886/349d52b166e3/jcm-12-03678-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a5e/10253886/75ad403aadd8/jcm-12-03678-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
A Review of Risk Scores within Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding.上消化道出血风险评分综述
J Clin Med. 2023 May 26;12(11):3678. doi: 10.3390/jcm12113678.
2
Risk scoring systems to predict need for clinical intervention for patients with nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal tract bleeding.预测非静脉曲张性上消化道出血患者临床干预需求的风险评分系统。
Am J Emerg Med. 2007 Sep;25(7):774-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2006.12.024.
3
Upper gastrointestinal bleeding: predictors of risk in a mixed patient group including variceal and nonvariceal haemorrhage.上消化道出血:包括静脉曲张性和非静脉曲张性出血在内的混合患者群体的风险预测因素。
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012 Feb;24(2):149-54. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0b013e32834e37d6.
4
Risk assessment scores for patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding and their use in clinical practice.上消化道出血患者的风险评估评分及其在临床实践中的应用。
Hosp Pract (1995). 2015;43(5):290-8. doi: 10.1080/21548331.2015.1103636. Epub 2015 Nov 4.
5
Diagnosis and management of nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline.非静脉曲张性上消化道出血的诊断和治疗:欧洲胃肠道内镜学会(ESGE)指南。
Endoscopy. 2015 Oct;47(10):a1-46. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1393172. Epub 2015 Sep 29.
6
Prospective comparison of three risk scoring systems in non-variceal and variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding.非静脉曲张性和静脉曲张性上消化道出血中三种风险评分系统的前瞻性比较
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016 Apr;31(4):761-7. doi: 10.1111/jgh.13222.
7
Modified Blatchford Score for Risk Stratification in Adult Patient with Nonvariceal Upper Gastrointestinal Haemorrhage and Their Short Term Hospital Outcome.改良布莱奇福德评分在非静脉曲张性上消化道出血成年患者风险分层及其短期住院结局中的应用
Mymensingh Med J. 2017 Jul;26(3):490-497.
8
Predictive validity of the Glasgow Blatchford Bleeding Score in an unselected emergency department population in continental Europe.在欧洲大陆的一个非选择性急诊人群中,格拉斯哥·布拉奇福德出血评分的预测有效性。
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012 Apr;24(4):382-7. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0b013e3283505965.
9
Comparison of three risk scores to predict outcomes in upper gastrointestinal bleeding; modifying Glasgow-Blatchford with albumin.三种预测上消化道出血预后的风险评分比较:用白蛋白修正格拉斯哥-布拉奇福德评分
Rom J Intern Med. 2019 Dec 1;57(4):322-333. doi: 10.2478/rjim-2019-0016.
10
Acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) - initial evaluation and management.急性上消化道出血(UGIB)- 初步评估与管理。
Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2013 Oct;27(5):633-8. doi: 10.1016/j.bpg.2013.09.002. Epub 2013 Sep 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Predictive Utility of Pre- and Post-Endoscopic Risk Scores and Hemodynamic Indexes in Acute Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding in the Emergency Department.急诊科急性上消化道出血中内镜检查前后风险评分及血流动力学指标的预测效用
Int J Gen Med. 2025 Aug 28;18:4873-4884. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S532949. eCollection 2025.
2
Upper gastrointestinal bleeding differences between older and younger adults: should bleeding in non-cirrhotic patients be considered a geriatric syndrome?老年人与年轻人上消化道出血的差异:非肝硬化患者的出血是否应被视为一种老年综合征?
Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2025 Jun 9;18:17562848251343416. doi: 10.1177/17562848251343416. eCollection 2025.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Performance of the New ABC and MAP(ASH) Scores in the Prediction of Relevant Outcomes in Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding.新型ABC和MAP(ASH)评分在上消化道出血相关结局预测中的表现
J Clin Med. 2023 Jan 30;12(3):1085. doi: 10.3390/jcm12031085.
2
External validation and comparison of the Glasgow-Blatchford score, modified Glasgow-Blatchford score, Rockall score and AIMS65 score in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a cross-sectional observational study in Western Switzerland.瑞士西部一项上消化道出血患者的横断面观察性研究:格拉斯哥-布拉奇福德评分、改良格拉斯哥-布拉奇福德评分、罗克洛评分和 AIMS65 评分的外部验证和比较。
Eur J Emerg Med. 2023 Feb 1;30(1):32-39. doi: 10.1097/MEJ.0000000000000983. Epub 2022 Nov 10.
3
Development and validation of a machine learning model to predict hemostatic intervention in patients with acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
用于预测急性上消化道出血患者止血干预的机器学习模型的开发与验证
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2025 Mar 24;25(1):145. doi: 10.1186/s12911-025-02969-x.
4
The role of shock indexes and RDW/albumin ratio in upper gastrointestinal bleeding : Predicting adverse outcomes.休克指数和红细胞分布宽度/白蛋白比值在上消化道出血中的作用:预测不良结局
Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed. 2025 Mar 24. doi: 10.1007/s00063-025-01267-8.
5
Clinical Epidemiology, Etiology, and Outcomes of Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding at a Tertiary Center in Bahrain: A Retrospective Study.巴林一家三级医疗中心上消化道出血的临床流行病学、病因及转归:一项回顾性研究
Cureus. 2025 Jan 8;17(1):e77133. doi: 10.7759/cureus.77133. eCollection 2025 Jan.
6
Comparison of Four Scoring Systems for Patients With Nonvariceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding.非静脉曲张性上消化道出血患者四种评分系统的比较
Cureus. 2024 Nov 28;16(11):e74684. doi: 10.7759/cureus.74684. eCollection 2024 Nov.
7
Importance of risk assessment, endoscopic hemostasis, and recent advancements in the management of acute non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding.风险评估、内镜止血的重要性以及急性非静脉曲张性上消化道出血管理的最新进展
World J Clin Cases. 2024 Aug 26;12(24):5462-5467. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v12.i24.5462.
8
Neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio predict outcome of upper gastrointestinal bleeding in emergency.中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值可预测急诊上消化道出血的预后。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Aug 8;11:1366715. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1366715. eCollection 2024.
9
Validating the CHAMPS Score: A Novel and Reliable Prognostic Score of Non-Variceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding.验证CHAMPS评分:一种新型且可靠的非静脉曲张性上消化道出血预后评分
Clin Exp Gastroenterol. 2024 Jul 15;17:201-211. doi: 10.2147/CEG.S469218. eCollection 2024.
Validation of the new ABC score for predicting 30-day mortality in gastrointestinal bleeding.
新 ABC 评分预测胃肠道出血 30 天死亡率的验证。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2022 Jun 21;22(1):301. doi: 10.1186/s12876-022-02374-y.
4
Increasing the low-risk threshold for patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding during the COVID-19 pandemic: a prospective, multicentre feasibility study.在新冠疫情期间提高上消化道出血患者的低风险阈值:一项前瞻性、多中心可行性研究。
Frontline Gastroenterol. 2021 Aug 25;13(4):303-308. doi: 10.1136/flgastro-2021-101851. eCollection 2022.
5
Comparison of assessment tools in acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding: which one for which decision.急性上消化道出血评估工具的比较:哪种工具用于哪种决策。
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2022 Jan;57(1):1-7. doi: 10.1080/00365521.2021.1976268. Epub 2021 Sep 17.
6
ACG Clinical Guideline: Upper Gastrointestinal and Ulcer Bleeding.ACG 临床指南:上消化道和溃疡出血。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2021 May 1;116(5):899-917. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000001245.
7
Endoscopic diagnosis and management of nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage (NVUGIH): European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline - Update 2021.内镜诊断和非静脉曲张性上消化道出血(NVUGIH)的处理:欧洲胃肠道内镜学会(ESGE)指南 - 2021 年更新。
Endoscopy. 2021 Mar;53(3):300-332. doi: 10.1055/a-1369-5274. Epub 2021 Feb 10.
8
Automated Identification of Adults at Risk for In-Hospital Clinical Deterioration.自动化识别住院临床恶化风险成人。
N Engl J Med. 2020 Nov 12;383(20):1951-1960. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa2001090.
9
ABC score: a new risk score that accurately predicts mortality in acute upper and lower gastrointestinal bleeding: an international multicentre study.ABC 评分:一种新的风险评分,可准确预测急性上、下消化道出血患者的死亡率:一项国际多中心研究。
Gut. 2021 Apr;70(4):707-716. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2019-320002. Epub 2020 Jul 28.
10
Validation of a new risk score system for non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding.验证一种新的非静脉曲张性上消化道出血风险评分系统。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2020 Jun 17;20(1):193. doi: 10.1186/s12876-020-01346-4.