Department of Health Policy and Management, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York, New York.
Department of Epidemiology, Brown School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island; Center for Gerontology and Health Care Research, Brown School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island; Population Studies and Training Center, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island.
Womens Health Issues. 2023 Sep-Oct;33(5):508-514. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2023.05.001. Epub 2023 Jun 8.
Despite efforts to improve postpartum health care in the United States, little is known about patterns of postpartum care beyond routine postpartum visit attendance. This study aimed to describe variation in outpatient postpartum care patterns.
In this longitudinal cohort study of national commercial claims data, we used latent class analysis to identify subgroups of patients (classes) with similar outpatient postpartum care patterns (defined by the number of preventive, problem, and emergency department outpatient visits in the 60 days after birth). We also compared classes in terms of maternal sociodemographics and clinical characteristics measured at childbirth, as well as total health spending and rates of adverse events (all-cause hospitalizations and severe maternal morbidity) measured from childbirth to the late postpartum period (61-365 days after birth).
The study cohort included 250,048 patients hospitalized for childbirth in 2016. We identified six classes with distinct outpatient postpartum care patterns in the 60 days after birth, which we classified into three broad groups: no care (class 1 [32.4% of the total sample]); preventive care only (class 2 [18.3%]); and problem care (classes 3-6 [49.3%]). The prevalence of clinical risk factors at childbirth increased progressively from class 1 to class 6; for example, 6.7% of class 1 patients had any chronic disease compared with 15.5% of class 5 patients. Severe maternal morbidity was highest among the high problem care classes (classes 5 and 6): 1.5% of class 6 patients experienced severe maternal morbidity in the postpartum period and 0.5% in the late postpartum period, compared with less than 0.1% of patients in classes 1 and 2.
Efforts to redesign and measure postpartum care should reflect the current heterogeneity in care patterns and clinical risks in the postpartum population.
尽管美国一直在努力改善产后护理,但对于产后护理的模式,除了常规的产后访视之外,人们知之甚少。本研究旨在描述产后门诊护理模式的变化。
在这项针对全国商业索赔数据的纵向队列研究中,我们使用潜在类别分析来识别具有相似产后门诊护理模式的患者亚组(类别)(通过产后 60 天内预防、问题和急诊门诊就诊次数定义)。我们还比较了分娩时的产妇社会人口统计学和临床特征以及从分娩到产后晚期(产后 61-365 天)的总健康支出和不良事件(全因住院和严重产妇并发症)发生率方面的类别差异。
本研究队列包括 2016 年因分娩住院的 250048 名患者。我们在产后 60 天内发现了六种具有不同产后门诊护理模式的类别,将其分为三大类:无护理(类别 1 [总样本的 32.4%]);仅预防护理(类别 2 [18.3%]);以及问题护理(类别 3-6 [49.3%])。分娩时临床风险因素的患病率从类别 1 到类别 6逐渐增加;例如,类别 1 中有 6.7%的患者患有任何慢性病,而类别 5 中有 15.5%的患者患有任何慢性病。高问题护理类别中严重产妇并发症的发生率最高(类别 5 和 6):6 类中有 1.5%的患者在产后期间发生严重产妇并发症,0.5%在产后晚期,而 1 类和 2 类患者不到 0.1%。
重新设计和衡量产后护理的努力应该反映产后人群中护理模式和临床风险的当前异质性。