Suppr超能文献

健康母亲和足月婴儿的产后早期出院。

Early postnatal discharge from hospital for healthy mothers and term infants.

机构信息

Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.

c/o Cochrane Incontinence, Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.

出版信息

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Jun 8;6(6):CD002958. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002958.pub2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Length of postnatal hospital stay has declined dramatically in the past 50 years. There is ongoing controversy about whether staying less time in hospital is harmful or beneficial. This is an update of a Cochrane Review first published in 2002, and previously updated in 2009.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of a policy of early postnatal discharge from hospital for healthy mothers and term infants in terms of important maternal, infant and paternal health and related outcomes.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register, ClinicalTrials.gov, the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) (21 May 2021) and the reference lists of retrieved articles.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials comparing early discharge from hospital of healthy mothers and term infants (at least 37 weeks' gestation and greater than or equal to 2500 g), with the standard care in the respective settings in which trials were conducted. Trials using allocation methods that were not truly random (e.g. based on patient number or day of the week), trials with a cluster-randomisation design and trials published only in abstract form were also eligible for inclusion.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently assessed trials for inclusion and risk of bias, extracted and checked data for accuracy, and assessed the certainty of evidence using the GRADE approach. We contacted authors of ongoing trials for additional information.

MAIN RESULTS

We identified 17 trials (involving 9409 women) that met our inclusion criteria. We did not identify any trials from low-income countries. There was substantial variation in the definition of 'early discharge', ranging from six hours to four to five days. The extent of antenatal preparation and midwifery home care offered to women following discharge in intervention and control groups also varied considerably among trials. Nine trials recruited and randomised women in pregnancy, seven trials randomised women following childbirth and one did not report whether randomisation took place before or after childbirth. Risk of bias was generally unclear in most domains due to insufficient reporting of trial methods. The certainty of evidence is moderate to low and the reasons for downgrading were high or unclear risk of bias, imprecision (low numbers of events or wide 95% confidence intervals (CI)), and inconsistency (heterogeneity in direction and size of effect). Infant outcomes Early discharge probably slightly increases the number of infants readmitted within 28 days for neonatal morbidity (including jaundice, dehydration, infections) (risk ratio (RR) 1.59, 95% CI 1.27 to 1.98; 6918 infants; 10 studies; moderate-certainty evidence). In the early discharge group, the risk of infant readmission was 69 per 1000 infants compared to 43 per 1000 infants in the standard care group. It is uncertain whether early discharge has any effect on the risk of infant mortality within 28 days (RR 0.39, 95% CI 0.04 to 3.74; 4882 infants; two studies; low-certainty evidence). Early postnatal discharge probably makes little to no difference in the number of infants having at least one unscheduled medical consultation or contact with health professionals within the first four weeks after birth (RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.67 to 1.16; 639 infants; four studies; moderate-certainty evidence). Maternal outcomes Early discharge probably results in little to no difference in women readmitted within six weeks postpartum for complications related to childbirth (RR 1.12, 95% CI 0.82 to 1.54; 6992 women; 11 studies; moderate-certainty evidence) but the wide 95% CI indicates the possibility that the true effect is either an increase or a reduction in risk. Similarly, early discharge may result in little to no difference in the risk of depression within six months postpartum (RR 0.80, 95% CI 0.46 to 1.42; 4333 women; five studies; low-certainty evidence) but the wide 95% CI suggests the possibility that the true effect is either an increase or a reduction in risk. Early discharge probably results in little to no difference in women breastfeeding at six weeks postpartum (RR 1.04, 95% CI 0.96 to 1.13; 7156 women; 10 studies; moderate-certainty evidence) or in the number of women having at least one unscheduled medical consultation or contact with health professionals (RR 0.72, 95% CI 0.43 to 1.20; 464 women; two studies; moderate-certainty evidence). Maternal mortality within six weeks postpartum was not reported in any of the studies. Costs Early discharge may slightly reduce the costs of hospital care in the period immediately following the birth up to the time of discharge (low-certainty evidence; data not pooled) but it may result in little to no difference in costs of postnatal care following discharge from hospital, in the period up to six weeks after the birth (low-certainty evidence; data not pooled).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: The definition of 'early discharge' varied considerably among trials, which made interpretation of results challenging. Early discharge probably leads to a higher risk of infant readmission within 28 days of birth, but probably makes little to no difference to the risk of maternal readmission within six weeks postpartum. We are uncertain if early discharge has any effect on the risk of infant or maternal mortality. With regard to maternal depression, breastfeeding, the number of contacts with health professionals, and costs of care, there may be little to no difference between early discharge and standard discharge but further trials measuring these outcomes are needed in order to enhance the level of certainty of the evidence. Large well-designed trials of early discharge policies, incorporating process evaluation and using standardized approaches to outcome assessment, are needed to assess the uptake of co-interventions. Since none of the evidence presented here comes from low-income countries, where infant and maternal mortality may be higher, it is important to conduct future trials in low-income settings.

摘要

背景

在过去的 50 年中,产后住院时间大幅缩短。目前,关于住院时间较短是否有害或有益仍存在争议。这是 2002 年首次发表的 Cochrane 综述的更新内容,之前于 2009 年进行了更新。

目的

评估对于健康母亲和足月婴儿实行早期产后出院政策的效果,以了解母婴健康和相关结局的重要指标。

检索方法

我们检索了 Cochrane 妊娠和分娩组试验注册库、ClinicalTrials.gov、世界卫生组织国际临床试验注册平台(ICTRP)(2021 年 5 月 21 日)和检索到的文章的参考文献列表。

纳入标准

比较健康母亲和足月婴儿(至少 37 周妊娠且体重≥2500 克)早期出院与各自环境下标准护理的随机对照试验。使用并非真正随机的分配方法(如基于患者编号或周几)的试验、采用整群随机设计的试验和仅以摘要形式发表的试验也符合纳入标准。

排除标准

母亲患有严重合并症或疾病的婴儿、需要新生儿重症监护的婴儿或在试验期间接受过任何特殊干预的婴儿的试验。

数据收集和分析

两名综述作者独立评估试验是否纳入以及偏倚风险,提取和核对数据的准确性,并使用 GRADE 方法评估证据的确定性。我们联系了正在进行的试验的作者以获取更多信息。

主要结果

我们确定了 17 项符合纳入标准的试验(涉及 9409 名女性)。我们没有发现来自低收入国家的试验。“早期出院”的定义差异很大,范围从 6 小时到 4 至 5 天。干预组和对照组在出院后为女性提供的产前准备和助产士家庭护理的程度也存在很大差异。9 项试验在妊娠期间招募和随机分配女性,7 项试验在分娩后随机分配女性,1 项试验未报告随机分配是在分娩前还是分娩后进行。由于试验方法报告不充分,大多数领域的偏倚风险通常不明确。证据的确定性为中等到低,降级的原因是高或不确定的偏倚风险、不精确(事件数量或置信区间较窄)以及不一致性(效应的方向和大小存在差异)。婴儿结局:早期出院可能会略微增加 28 天内因新生儿发病(包括黄疸、脱水、感染)而再次入院的婴儿数量(风险比(RR)1.59,95%置信区间(CI)1.27 至 1.98;6918 名婴儿;10 项研究;中等确定性证据)。在早期出院组中,每 1000 名婴儿中有 69 名需要再次入院,而在标准护理组中,每 1000 名婴儿中有 43 名需要再次入院。目前尚不确定早期出院对 28 天内婴儿死亡率是否有任何影响(RR 0.39,95%置信区间(CI)0.04 至 3.74;4882 名婴儿;2 项研究;低确定性证据)。早期产后出院可能对婴儿在出生后四周内至少有一次未预约的医疗咨询或与卫生专业人员接触的次数几乎没有影响(RR 0.88,95%置信区间(CI)0.67 至 1.16;639 名婴儿;4 项研究;中等确定性证据)。产妇结局:早期出院可能对产后 6 周内因分娩相关并发症而再次入院的女性几乎没有影响(RR 1.12,95%置信区间(CI)0.82 至 1.54;6992 名女性;11 项研究;中等确定性证据),但宽的 95%CI 表明真实效应可能是风险增加或降低。同样,早期出院对产后 6 个月内抑郁的风险可能几乎没有影响(RR 0.80,95%置信区间(CI)0.46 至 1.42;4333 名女性;5 项研究;低确定性证据),但宽的 95%CI 表明真实效应可能是风险增加或降低。早期出院可能对产后 6 周内母乳喂养的女性几乎没有影响(RR 1.04,95%置信区间(CI)0.96 至 1.13;7156 名女性;10 项研究;中等确定性证据),或对至少有一次未预约的医疗咨询或与卫生专业人员接触的女性几乎没有影响(RR 0.72,95%置信区间(CI)0.43 至 1.20;464 名女性;2 项研究;中等确定性证据)。任何研究都没有报告产后 6 周内的产妇死亡率。成本:早期出院可能会略微降低产后立即至出院期间的住院费用(低确定性证据;未进行数据合并),但可能对出院后至出生后 6 周期间的产后护理费用几乎没有影响(低确定性证据;未进行数据合并)。

作者结论

试验之间“早期出院”的定义差异很大,这使得结果的解释具有挑战性。早期出院可能会导致婴儿在出生后 28 天内再次入院的风险增加,但可能对产后 6 周内母亲再次入院的风险几乎没有影响。我们不确定早期出院对婴儿或产妇死亡率是否有任何影响。至于产妇抑郁、母乳喂养、与卫生专业人员的接触次数和护理费用,早期出院与标准出院之间可能几乎没有差异,但需要进行更多的测量这些结局的试验,以提高证据的确定性。需要进行大型、设计良好的早期出院政策试验,纳入过程评估并使用标准化方法评估结局,以评估共同干预措施的接受情况。由于这里呈现的证据都没有来自婴儿和产妇死亡率可能更高的低收入国家,因此在低收入国家进行未来的试验非常重要。

相似文献

1
Early postnatal discharge from hospital for healthy mothers and term infants.健康母亲和足月婴儿的产后早期出院。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Jun 8;6(6):CD002958. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002958.pub2.
2
Schedules for home visits in the early postpartum period.产后访视日程安排。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Jul 21;7(7):CD009326. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009326.pub4.
4
Induction of labour at or beyond 37 weeks' gestation.妊娠37周及以后引产。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jul 15;7(7):CD004945. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004945.pub5.
9
Support for healthy breastfeeding mothers with healthy term babies.支持健康足月婴儿的母乳喂养母亲。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Oct 25;10(10):CD001141. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001141.pub6.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

5
Newborn Length of Stay and Risk of Readmission.新生儿住院时长与再入院风险
Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2017 May;31(3):221-232. doi: 10.1111/ppe.12359. Epub 2017 Apr 18.
8
Early discharge of infants and risk of readmission for jaundice.婴儿提前出院与黄疸再入院风险。
Pediatrics. 2015 Feb;135(2):314-21. doi: 10.1542/peds.2014-2388. Epub 2015 Jan 12.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验