Kwakman Judith A, Poley Marten J, Vos Margreet C, Bruno Marco J
Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Department of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Erasmus MC University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Endosc Int Open. 2023 Jun 9;11(6):E571-E580. doi: 10.1055/a-2064-9721. eCollection 2023 Jun.
Single-use duodenoscopes can prevent transmission of microorganisms through contaminated reusable duodenoscopes. Concerns regarding their economic and environmental impact impede the transition to single-use duodenoscopes. This study investigated the costs associated with two scenarios in which single-use duodenoscopes are used in patients carrying multidrug-resistant microorganisms (MDROs). Break-even costs for single-use duodenoscopes were calculated for two scenarios in which patients were screened for MDRO carriage before undergoing endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). Only direct costs related to the endoscopy were taken into consideration. In Scenario 1, patients were screened through microbiological culturing with a lag time in receiving the test result. In Scenario 2, screening was performed using GeneXpert analysis providing a rapid read-out. Calculations were performed using data from a Dutch tertiary care center and also with US healthcare data. In the Dutch situation, single-use duodenoscopes needed to be priced at a maximum of € 140 to € 250 to break-even. In the US analyses, break-even costs varied widely, depending on the duodenoscope-associated infection costs used, ERCP volume, and infection risk. The break-even costs in Scenario 1 ranged between $78.21 and $2,747.54 and in Scenario 2, between $248.89 and $2,209.23. This study showed that a crossover scenario in which single-use duodenoscopes are only used in patients carrying MDROs could be an economically viable alternative to a complete transition to single-use duodenoscopes. In the Dutch setting, single-use duodenoscopes need to be priced much lower than in the United States to reach a per-procedure cost that is comparable with a scenario using reusable duodenoscopes exclusively.
一次性十二指肠镜可防止微生物通过受污染的可重复使用十二指肠镜传播。对其经济和环境影响的担忧阻碍了向一次性十二指肠镜的转变。本研究调查了在携带多重耐药微生物(MDROs)的患者中使用一次性十二指肠镜的两种情况下的成本。 针对两种情况计算了一次性十二指肠镜的盈亏平衡成本,即在患者接受内镜逆行胰胆管造影(ERCP)之前对其进行MDRO携带筛查。仅考虑与内镜检查相关的直接成本。在方案1中,通过微生物培养对患者进行筛查,但接收检测结果存在延迟。在方案2中,使用GeneXpert分析进行筛查,可快速得出结果。使用来自荷兰一家三级护理中心的数据以及美国医疗保健数据进行了计算。 在荷兰的情况下,一次性十二指肠镜的定价最高为140欧元至250欧元才能实现盈亏平衡。在美国的分析中,盈亏平衡成本差异很大,这取决于所使用的与十二指肠镜相关的感染成本、ERCP的数量以及感染风险。方案1中的盈亏平衡成本在78.21美元至2747.54美元之间,方案2中的盈亏平衡成本在248.89美元至2209.23美元之间。 本研究表明,仅在携带MDROs的患者中使用一次性十二指肠镜的交叉方案可能是完全过渡到一次性十二指肠镜的一种经济可行的替代方案。在荷兰的环境中,一次性十二指肠镜的定价需要比美国低得多,才能达到与仅使用可重复使用十二指肠镜的方案相当的每次手术成本。