Suppr超能文献

主动脉瓣再植入三十年——布鲁塞尔的经验

Three decades of reimplantation of the aortic valve-the Brussels experience.

作者信息

Jahanyar Jama, de Kerchove Laurent, Arabkhani Bardia, Tsai Peter I, Aphram Gaby, Mastrobuoni Stefano, El Khoury Gebrine

机构信息

Department of Cardiovascular & Thoracic Surgery, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain (UCL), Brussels, Belgium.

Division of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, Queen's Heart Institute, Department of Surgery, John A. Burns School of Medicine, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, HI, USA.

出版信息

Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2023 May 31;12(3):244-252. doi: 10.21037/acs-2023-avs1-23. Epub 2023 May 8.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Over the last three decades, the importance of native valve preservation has increasingly become evident. Valve-sparing root replacement procedures, such as the reimplantation or remodeling technique, are therefore being progressively used for aortic root replacement and/or aortic valve repair. Herein, we are summarizing our single-center experience with the reimplantation technique.

METHODS

We queried our prospective database for aortic valve repair and recruited all adult (≥18 years) patients who have undergone valve-sparing root replacement with the reimplantation technique between March 1998 and January 2022. We subcategorized the patients into three distinct groups: root aneurysm without aortic regurgitation (AR) (grade ≤1+), root aneurysm with AR (grade >1+) and isolated chronic AR (root <45 mm). Univariable logistic regression analysis was performed to identify variables of interest, which were further analyzed by multivariable Cox-regression analysis. Survival, freedom from valve reintervention, and freedom from recurrent regurgitation, were analyzed with the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

A total of 652 patients were recruited for this study; 213 patients underwent reimplantation for aortic aneurysm without AR, 289 patients for aortic aneurysm with AR, and 150 patients with isolated AR. Cumulative survival was 95.4% (95% CI: 92.9-97.0%) after 5 years, 84.8% (80.0-88.5%) after 10 years, and 79.5% (73.3-84.5%) after 12 years, which was comparable to the age-matched Belgian population. Older age (HR 1.06, P≤0.001) and male gender (HR 2.1, P=0.02) were associated with late mortality. Freedom from reoperation on the aortic valve at 5 years was 96.2% (95% CI: 93.8-97.7%), and 90.4% (95% CI: 87.4-94.2%) at 12 years. Age (P=0.001) and preoperative left ventricular end-diastolic dimension (LVEDD) (P=0.03) were associated with late reoperation.

CONCLUSIONS

Our long-term data supports our reimplantation approach as a viable option for aortic root aneurysms and/or aortic regurgitation, with long-term survival that mirrors that of the general population.

摘要

背景

在过去三十年中,保留自体瓣膜的重要性日益明显。因此,诸如再植入或重塑技术等保留瓣膜的根部置换手术正逐渐用于主动脉根部置换和/或主动脉瓣修复。在此,我们总结了我们单中心采用再植入技术的经验。

方法

我们查询了我们关于主动脉瓣修复的前瞻性数据库,并招募了所有在1998年3月至2022年1月期间接受了采用再植入技术的保留瓣膜根部置换的成年(≥18岁)患者。我们将患者分为三个不同的组:无主动脉瓣反流(AR)(分级≤1+)的根部动脉瘤、有AR(分级>1+)的根部动脉瘤和孤立性慢性AR(根部<45mm)。进行单变量逻辑回归分析以确定感兴趣的变量,并通过多变量Cox回归分析进一步分析。采用Kaplan-Meier方法分析生存率、免于瓣膜再次干预率和免于复发性反流率。

结果

本研究共招募了652例患者;213例患者因无AR的主动脉瘤接受再植入,289例患者因有AR的主动脉瘤接受再植入,150例患者患有孤立性AR。5年后累积生存率为95.4%(95%CI:92.9 - 97.0%),10年后为84.8%(80.0 - 88.5%),12年后为79.5%(73.3 - 84.5%),这与年龄匹配的比利时人群相当。年龄较大(HR 1.06,P≤0.001)和男性(HR 2.1,P = 0.02)与晚期死亡率相关。5年时主动脉瓣再次手术的免手术率为96.2%(95%CI:93.8 - 97.7%),12年时为90.4%(95%CI:87.4 - 94.2%)。年龄(P = 0.001)和术前左心室舒张末期内径(LVEDD)(P = 0.03)与晚期再次手术相关。

结论

我们的长期数据支持我们的再植入方法作为主动脉根部动脉瘤和/或主动脉瓣反流的一种可行选择,其长期生存率与普通人群相当。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c7c5/10248911/91298bf9d588/acs-12-03-244-f1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验