• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

三尖瓣主动脉瓣保留瓣膜根部再植入手术的长期经验

Long-term experience with valve-sparing root reimplantation surgery in tricuspid aortic valve.

作者信息

Tamer Saadallah, Mastrobuoni Stefano, Momeni Mona, Aphram Gaby, Navarra Emiliano, Poncelet Alain, Noirhomme Philippe, Astarci Parla, El Khoury Gebrine, de Kerchove Laurent

机构信息

Pôle de Recherche Cardiovasculaire, Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique (IREC), Université Catholique de Louvain and Division of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium.

Division of Anesthesiologyy, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium.

出版信息

Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2020 Jan;36(Suppl 1):71-80. doi: 10.1007/s12055-019-00842-x. Epub 2019 Aug 9.

DOI:10.1007/s12055-019-00842-x
PMID:33061187
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7525735/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To analyze our long-term experience with valve-sparing reimplantation technique in treating aortic root aneurysm, aortic regurgitation, and aortic dissection in patients with tricuspid aortic valve.

METHODS

Between March 1998 and October 2018, 303 consecutive patients underwent valve-sparing reimplantation in our institution. The mean age of this cohort was 52.9 ± 15 years. Time to event analysis was performed with the Kaplan-Meier method. Risk of death, reoperation, and aortic regurgitation (AR) recurrence were analyzed using the cox-regression method.

RESULTS

In-hospital mortality was 1% ( = 3) of which two were admitted for acute aortic dissection. Median follow-up was 5.81 years ([IQR]: 2.8-10 years). Thirty-nine patients (14.4%) died during follow-up. At 5 and 10 years, overall survival was 92 ± 2%and 75 ± 4.9%, respectively. Seventeen patients required late aortic valve reoperation. Freedom from valve reoperation was 95 ± 2% and 90 ± 3%. Freedom from AR > 2+ and AR > 1+ at 10 years was 91 ± 4% and 71.5 ± 4.6%, respectively. Significant multivariate predictors of death included age, New York Heart Association dyspnea class (NYHA), type A acute dissection (TAAD), and preoperative left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD). Significant multivariate predictors of AR recurrence included indication for surgery, previous cardiac surgery, and presence of preoperative AR. Freedom from events like major bleeding, thromboembolic events, and infective endocarditis at 10 years were 97%, 98%, and 96%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Aortic valve-sparing with the reimplantation technique has been performed for over two decades in our institution, and the results in patients with tricuspid aortic valve (TAV) are excellent in terms of survival and freedom from valve-related adverse outcomes including valve reoperation. These results continue supporting the use of valve sparing root replacement using the reimplantation technique (VSRR) in patients with aortic aneurysm, irrespective of whether they have preoperative AR or not. VSRR is safe, durable, and reproducible, but further follow-up, well into the second decade is still necessary.

摘要

目的

分析我们采用保留瓣膜再植入技术治疗三尖瓣主动脉瓣患者的主动脉根部瘤、主动脉瓣反流和主动脉夹层的长期经验。

方法

1998年3月至2018年10月期间,我们机构连续303例患者接受了保留瓣膜再植入手术。该队列的平均年龄为52.9±15岁。采用Kaplan-Meier方法进行事件发生时间分析。使用Cox回归方法分析死亡、再次手术和主动脉瓣反流(AR)复发的风险。

结果

住院死亡率为1%(n=3),其中2例因急性主动脉夹层入院。中位随访时间为5.81年([四分位间距]:2.8 - 10年)。39例患者(14.4%)在随访期间死亡。在5年和10年时,总生存率分别为92±2%和75±4.9%。17例患者需要晚期主动脉瓣再次手术。无瓣膜再次手术率为95±2%和90±3%。10年时无AR>2+和AR>1+的发生率分别为91±4%和71.5±4.6%。死亡的显著多因素预测因素包括年龄、纽约心脏协会呼吸困难分级(NYHA)、A型急性夹层(TAAD)和术前左心室舒张末期直径(LVEDD)。AR复发的显著多因素预测因素包括手术指征、既往心脏手术和术前AR的存在。10年时无大出血、血栓栓塞事件和感染性心内膜炎等事件的发生率分别为97%、98%和96%。

结论

我们机构采用保留瓣膜再植入技术已超过二十年,对于三尖瓣主动脉瓣(TAV)患者,在生存以及避免包括瓣膜再次手术在内的瓣膜相关不良结局方面结果优异。这些结果继续支持对主动脉瘤患者使用保留瓣膜根部置换的再植入技术(VSRR),无论他们术前是否有AR。VSRR安全、持久且可重复,但仍需要进一步随访至第二个十年。

相似文献

1
Long-term experience with valve-sparing root reimplantation surgery in tricuspid aortic valve.三尖瓣主动脉瓣保留瓣膜根部再植入手术的长期经验
Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2020 Jan;36(Suppl 1):71-80. doi: 10.1007/s12055-019-00842-x. Epub 2019 Aug 9.
2
Two decades of valve-sparing root reimplantation in tricuspid aortic valve: impact of aortic regurgitation and cusp repair.二十年来三尖瓣主动脉瓣保留根部再植入术:主动脉瓣反流和瓣叶修复的影响。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2021 May 8;59(5):1069-1076. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezaa427.
3
Long-term experience with valve-sparing reimplantation technique for the treatment of aortic aneurysm and aortic regurgitation.主动脉瘤和主动脉瓣反流的保留瓣膜再植入技术的长期经验。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2019 Jul;158(1):14-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2018.10.155. Epub 2018 Nov 26.
4
The role of annular dimension and annuloplasty in tricuspid aortic valve repair.瓣环尺寸及瓣环成形术在三尖瓣主动脉瓣修复中的作用。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2016 Feb;49(2):428-37; discussion 437-8. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezv050. Epub 2015 Feb 26.
5
Long-term outcomes and predictors of recurrent aortic regurgitation after aortic valve-sparing and reconstructive cusp surgery: a single centre experience.保留主动脉瓣和重建瓣叶手术治疗后复发性主动脉瓣反流的长期结局及预测因素:单中心经验
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2019 Nov 12;14(1):194. doi: 10.1186/s13019-019-1019-3.
6
Three decades of reimplantation of the aortic valve-the Brussels experience.主动脉瓣再植入三十年——布鲁塞尔的经验
Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2023 May 31;12(3):244-252. doi: 10.21037/acs-2023-avs1-23. Epub 2023 May 8.
7
Early and long-term results of aortic valve sparing aortic root reimplantation surgery for bicuspid and tricuspid aortic valves.保留主动脉瓣的主动脉根部再植入手术治疗二叶式和三叶式主动脉瓣的早期及长期结果
Perfusion. 2019 Sep;34(6):482-489. doi: 10.1177/0267659119831926. Epub 2019 Mar 1.
8
Survival and reoperation pattern after 20 years of experience with aortic valve-sparing root replacement in patients with tricuspid and bicuspid valves.20 年三尖瓣和二叶式主动脉瓣病变行保留主动脉瓣根部替换术后的生存和再次手术模式。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018 Apr;155(4):1403-1411.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2017.12.039. Epub 2017 Dec 13.
9
Valve-sparing root reimplantation and leaflet repair in a bicuspid aortic valve: comparison with the 3-cusp David procedure.二叶式主动脉瓣行保留瓣膜根部的根部重植和瓣叶修复:与三尖瓣 David 手术的比较。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015 Feb;149(2 Suppl):S22-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2014.10.103. Epub 2014 Nov 1.
10
Early and Late-Term Follow-Up Results of Patients Diagnosed with Aortic Aneurysm or Aortic Dissection with Aortic Regurgitation Undergoing Aortic Valve Repair or Valve-Sparing Aortic Surgery.诊断为主动脉瘤或主动脉夹层合并主动脉反流的患者接受主动脉瓣修复或保留瓣膜主动脉手术的早期和晚期随访结果
Braz J Cardiovasc Surg. 2021 Apr 1;36(2):192-200. doi: 10.21470/1678-9741-2020-0133.

引用本文的文献

1
Valve-sparing aortic root replacement using the reimplantation (David) technique: a systematic review and meta-analysis on survival and clinical outcome.采用再植入(David)技术保留瓣膜的主动脉根部置换术:关于生存和临床结局的系统评价与荟萃分析
Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2023 May 31;12(3):149-158. doi: 10.21037/acs-2023-avs1-0038.

本文引用的文献

1
Valve-sparing aortic root replacement (David I procedure) in Marfan disease: single-centre 20-year experience in more than 100 patients†.马凡综合征患者行保留主动脉瓣的主动脉根部替换术(David I 手术):20 年来单中心 100 多例患者的经验†。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2019 Mar 1;55(3):476-483. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezy300.
2
Biological solutions to aortic root replacement: valve-sparing versus bioprosthetic conduit.主动脉根部置换的生物解决方案:保留瓣膜与生物人工血管。
J Vis Surg. 2018 May 9;4:94. doi: 10.21037/jovs.2018.04.12. eCollection 2018.
3
Clinical Outcomes of Root Reimplantation and Bentall Procedure: Propensity Score Matching Analysis.根再植和 Bentall 手术的临床结果:倾向评分匹配分析。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2018 Aug;106(2):539-547. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2018.02.057. Epub 2018 Mar 27.
4
Aortic valve repair in patients with Marfan syndrome-the "Brussels approach".马凡综合征患者的主动脉瓣修复——“布鲁塞尔方法”
Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2017 Nov;6(6):704-708. doi: 10.21037/acs.2017.10.01.
5
Elective David I Procedure Has Excellent Long-Term Results: 20-Year Single-Center Experience.择期 David I 手术具有优异的长期疗效:20 年单中心经验。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2018 Mar;105(3):731-738. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2017.08.040. Epub 2017 Dec 2.
6
2017 ESC/EACTS Guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease.2017年欧洲心脏病学会/欧洲心胸外科学会瓣膜性心脏病管理指南。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2017 Oct 1;52(4):616-664. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezx324.
7
Tirone on Tirone David operation and types.蒂罗内谈蒂罗内·大卫手术及类型。
Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2019 Jan;67(1):66-69. doi: 10.1007/s11748-017-0819-4. Epub 2017 Aug 28.
8
Reimplantation of the aortic valve at 20 years.20 年后再次行主动脉瓣置换术。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2017 Feb;153(2):232-238. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2016.10.081. Epub 2016 Nov 16.
9
Valve-Sparing Root Replacement Compared With Composite Valve Graft Procedures in Patients With Aortic Root Dilation.主动脉根部扩张患者中保留瓣膜的根部置换与复合瓣叶移植物手术的比较。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016 Oct 25;68(17):1838-1847. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.07.767.
10
Suture Annuloplasty Significantly Improves the Durability of Bicuspid Aortic Valve Repair.缝线瓣环成形术显著提高二叶式主动脉瓣修复的耐久性。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2017 Feb;103(2):504-510. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2016.06.072. Epub 2016 Sep 20.