Suppr超能文献

接受再植入术与Bentall根部手术患者的结局比较。

Comparison of Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Reimplantation versus Bentall Root Procedure.

作者信息

Svensson Lars G, Rosinski Brad F, Tucker Nicholas J, Gillinov A Marc, Rajeswaran Jeevanantham, Roselli Eric E, Johnston Douglas R, Desai Milind Y, Griffin Brian P, Blackstone Eugene H

机构信息

Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Heart, Vascular, and Thoracic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.

The Aorta Center, Heart, Vascular, and Thoracic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.

出版信息

Aorta (Stamford). 2022 Apr;10(2):57-68. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1744135. Epub 2022 Aug 7.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

A bioprosthesis- or mechanical-prosthesis-containing polyester graft (composite graft) is standard surgical management for aortic root aneurysms (Bentall procedure), but particularly in the young patient in whom a bioprosthesis is likely to deteriorate and a mechanical prosthesis mandates life-long anticoagulation, valve-sparing procedures have been devised. One such procedure involves reimplantation of the native aortic valve in the polyester graft. With focus on selecting the optimum procedure for young relatively asymptomatic patients, we compared outcomes of reimplantation of the aortic valve versus the Bentall procedure and identified factors influencing outcomes.

METHODS

From January 2000 to January 2017, 643 adults age ≤ 70 with tricuspid aortic valves underwent elective aortic root replacement with either reimplantation ( = 448/70%) or a composite valve graft (Bentall) procedure ( = 195/30%). Outcomes were compared in 100 propensity-matched pairs.

RESULTS

Patients with fewer symptoms, less aortic regurgitation (AR), higher left ventricular ejection fraction, and smaller cross-sectional aortic area/height ratio had a higher likelihood of valve repair with reimplantation (all < 0.02) versus receiving a Bentall procedure. Operative mortality was 0.16% (reimplantation, 1/448, 0.22%; Bentall 0/195, 0%). After reimplantation, 8-year freedom from severe AR was 95% and 10-year freedom from reintervention was 98%. Ten-year survival was 95%. Higher preoperative AR grade (< 0.0001) but not larger root diameter ( = 0.3) was associated with higher grade of late regurgitation after a reimplantation procedure. Among propensity-matched patients, reimplantation compared with a Bentall was associated with similar 10-year survival (89% vs. 94%), but more late AR (8-year freedom from severe AR: 93% vs. 99.9%) and greater early reduction in, but similar late, left ventricular mass (104 vs. 105 g•m at 8 years).

CONCLUSION

Excellent aortic valve reimplantation results versus Bentall lead us to recommend reimplantation more often in patients who present with even moderately severe or severe AR and significantly enlarged aortic roots.

摘要

背景

含生物假体或机械假体的聚酯移植物(复合移植物)是主动脉根部瘤(Bentall手术)的标准手术治疗方法,但对于年轻患者,生物假体可能会退化,而机械假体需要终身抗凝,因此设计了保留瓣膜的手术方法。其中一种手术方法是将天然主动脉瓣重新植入聚酯移植物中。为了专注于为相对无症状的年轻患者选择最佳手术方法,我们比较了主动脉瓣重新植入术与Bentall手术的结果,并确定了影响结果的因素。

方法

从2000年1月至2017年1月,643例年龄≤70岁的三尖瓣主动脉瓣成年患者接受了选择性主动脉根部置换术,其中采用重新植入术(n = 448/70%)或复合瓣膜移植物(Bentall)手术(n = 195/30%)。在100对倾向匹配的患者中比较结果。

结果

症状较少、主动脉反流(AR)较少、左心室射血分数较高以及主动脉横截面积/身高比较小的患者,与接受Bentall手术相比,采用重新植入术进行瓣膜修复的可能性更高(均P<0.02)。手术死亡率为0.16%(重新植入术,1/448,0.22%;Bentall手术,0/195,0%)。重新植入术后,8年无严重AR的自由度为95%,10年无再次干预的自由度为98%。10年生存率为95%。术前AR分级较高(P<0.0001)而非根部直径较大(P = 0.3)与重新植入术后晚期反流分级较高相关。在倾向匹配的患者中,与Bentall手术相比,重新植入术的10年生存率相似(89%对94%),但晚期AR更多(8年无严重AR的自由度:93%对99.9%),左心室质量早期降低更多,但晚期相似(8年时分别为104 g·m和105 g·m)。

结论

与Bentall手术相比,主动脉瓣重新植入术的出色结果使我们建议,对于出现中度严重或严重AR以及主动脉根部明显扩大的患者,更频繁地采用重新植入术。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5ada/9357471/fe3b4ae2b2ac/10-1055-s-0042-1744135-i200057-1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验