Social, Genetic and Developmental Psychiatry (SGDP) Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology, and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
National Institute for Health and Social Care Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centre, South London and Maudsley Hospital, London, UK.
Bipolar Disord. 2023 Nov;25(7):592-607. doi: 10.1111/bdi.13355. Epub 2023 Jun 12.
People with bipolar disorder who also report binge eating have increased psychopathology and greater impairment than those without binge eating. Whether this co-occurrence is related to binge eating as a symptom or presents differently across full-syndrome eating disorders with binge eating is unclear.
We first compared networks of 13 lifetime mania symptoms in 34,226 participants from the United Kingdom's National Institute for Health and Care Research BioResource with (n = 12,104) and without (n = 22,122) lifetime binge eating. Second, in the subsample with binge eating, we compared networks of mania symptoms in participants with lifetime anorexia nervosa binge-eating/purging (n = 825), bulimia nervosa (n = 3737), and binge-eating disorder (n = 3648).
People with binge eating endorsed every mania symptom significantly more often than those without binge eating. Within the subsample, people with bulimia nervosa most often had the highest endorsement rate of each mania symptom. We found significant differences in network parameter statistics, including network structure (M = 0.25, p = 0.001) and global strength (S = 1.84, p = 0.002) when comparing the binge eating with no binge-eating participants. However, network structure differences were sensitive to reductions in sample size and the greater density of the latter network was explained by the large proportion of participants (34%) without mania symptoms. The structure of the anorexia nervosa binge-eating/purging network differed from the bulimia nervosa network (M = 0.66, p = 0.001), but the result was unstable.
Our results suggest that the presence and structure of mania symptoms may be more associated with binge eating as a symptom rather than any specific binge-type eating disorder. Further research with larger sample sizes is required to confirm our findings.
报告暴食的双相障碍患者比没有暴食的患者具有更多的精神病理学和更大的损害。这种共病是与暴食作为一种症状有关,还是在伴有暴食的全面综合征进食障碍中表现不同,目前尚不清楚。
我们首先比较了来自英国国家卫生与保健研究所生物资源的 34226 名参与者中 13 项终生躁狂症状的网络,其中(n=12104)和没有(n=22122)终生暴食。其次,在有暴食的亚组中,我们比较了终生神经性厌食症暴食/清除(n=825)、贪食症(n=3737)和暴食障碍(n=3648)患者中躁狂症状的网络。
有暴食的人比没有暴食的人更经常地认可每一个躁狂症状。在亚组中,贪食症患者最常对每个躁狂症状的认可率最高。我们发现,在比较暴食与无暴食参与者时,网络参数统计数据,包括网络结构(M=0.25,p=0.001)和整体强度(S=1.84,p=0.002),存在显著差异。然而,网络结构差异对样本量的减少敏感,并且后者网络的更大密度可以用没有躁狂症状的参与者(34%)的较大比例来解释。神经性厌食症暴食/清除网络的结构与贪食症网络不同(M=0.66,p=0.001),但结果不稳定。
我们的研究结果表明,躁狂症状的存在和结构可能与暴食作为一种症状更相关,而不是任何特定的暴食型进食障碍。需要更大的样本量进一步研究来证实我们的发现。