HonorHealth Internal Medicine, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
HonorHealth Clinical Informatics, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
J Gen Intern Med. 2023 Sep;38(12):2734-2741. doi: 10.1007/s11606-023-08236-x. Epub 2023 Jun 12.
The coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic resulted in rapid implementation of telemedicine. Little is known about the impact of telemedicine on both no-show rates and healthcare disparities on the general primary care population during the pandemic.
To compare no-show rates between telemedicine and office visits in the primary care setting, while controlling for the burden of COVID-19 cases, with focus on underserved populations.
Retrospective cohort study.
Multi-center urban network of primary care clinics between April 2021 and December 2021.
A total of 311,517 completed primary care physician visits across 164,647 patients.
The primary outcome was risk ratio of no-show incidences (i.e., no-show rates) between telemedicine and office visits across demographic sub-groups including age, ethnicity, race, and payor type.
Compared to in-office visits, the overall risk of no-showing favored telemedicine, adjusted risk ratio of 0.68 (95% CI 0.65 to 0.71), absolute risk reduction (ARR) 4.0%. This favorability was most profound in several cohorts with racial/ethnic and socioeconomic differences with risk ratios in Black/African American 0.47 (95% CI 0.41 to 0.53), ARR 9.0%; Hispanic/Latino 0.63 (95% CI 0.58 to 0.68), ARR 4.6%; Medicaid 0.58 (95% CI 0.54 to 0.62) ARR 7.3%; Self-Pay 0.64 (95% CI 0.58 to 0.70) ARR 11.3%.
The analysis was limited to physician-only visits in a single setting and did not examine the reasons for visits.
As compared to office visits, patients using telemedicine have a lower risk of no-showing to primary care appointments. This is one step towards improved access to care.
2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行导致远程医疗迅速实施。在大流行期间,关于远程医疗对一般初级保健人群的未到诊率和医疗保健差异的影响知之甚少。
在控制 COVID-19 病例负担的情况下,比较初级保健环境中远程医疗和门诊就诊的未到诊率,并重点关注服务不足人群。
回顾性队列研究。
2021 年 4 月至 2021 年 12 月期间,多中心城市初级保健诊所网络。
共有 311517 名患者完成了 164647 名初级保健医生的就诊。
主要结果是在包括年龄、族裔、种族和支付者类型在内的人口统计学亚组中,远程医疗和门诊就诊的未到诊发生率(即未到诊率)的风险比。
与门诊就诊相比,整体未到诊风险有利于远程医疗,调整后的风险比为 0.68(95%CI 0.65 至 0.71),绝对风险降低(ARR)为 4.0%。在几个具有种族/族裔和社会经济差异的队列中,这种有利性最为明显,黑人和非裔美国人的风险比为 0.47(95%CI 0.41 至 0.53),ARR 为 9.0%;西班牙裔/拉丁裔为 0.63(95%CI 0.58 至 0.68),ARR 为 4.6%;医疗补助为 0.58(95%CI 0.54 至 0.62),ARR 为 7.3%;自付为 0.64(95%CI 0.58 至 0.70),ARR 为 11.3%。
该分析仅限于单一环境中的仅医生就诊,并未检查就诊的原因。
与门诊就诊相比,使用远程医疗的患者初级保健预约未到诊的风险较低。这是改善获得医疗保健机会的一步。