Jaksa Laszlo, Aryeetey Othniel James, Hatamikia Sepideh, Nägl Katharina, Buschmann Martin, Dieter H Pahr, Kronreif Gernot, Lorenz Andrea
Austrian Center for Medical Innovation and Technology (ACMIT), Wiener Neustadt, Austria.
Institute of Lightweight Design and Structural Biomechanics, Technical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Int J Bioprint. 2023 Mar 28;9(4):721. doi: 10.18063/ijb.721. eCollection 2023.
89Anatomic models have an important role in the medical domain. However, soft tissue mechanical properties' representation is limited in mass-produced and 3D-printed models. In this study, a multi-material 3D printer was used to print a human liver model featuring tuned mechanical and radiological properties, with the goal of comparing the printed model with its printing material and real liver tissue. The main target was mechanical realism, while radiological similarity was a secondary objective. Materials and internal structure were selected such that the printed model would resemble liver tissue in terms of tensile properties. The model was printed at 33% scaling and 40% gyroid infill with a soft silicone rubber, and silicone oil as a filler fluid. After printing, the liver model underwent CT scanning. Since the shape of the liver is incompatible with tensile testing, tensile testing specimens were also printed. Three replicates were printed with the same internal structure as the liver model and three more out of silicone rubber with 100% rectilinear infill to allow a comparison. All specimens were tested in a four-step cyclic loading test protocol to compare elastic moduli and dissipated energy ratios. The fluid-filled and full-silicone specimens had initial elastic moduli of 0.26 MPa and 0.37 MPa, respectively, and featured dissipated energy ratios of 0.140, 0.167, 0.183, and 0.118, 0.093, 0.081, respectively, in the second, third, and fourth loading cycles. The liver model showed 225 ± 30 Hounsfield units (HU) in CT, which is closer to real human liver (70 ± 30 HU) than the printing silicone (340 ± 50 HU). Results suggest that the liver model became more realistic in terms of mechanical and radiological properties with the proposed printing approach as opposed to printing only with silicone rubber. Thus, it has been demonstrated that this printing method enables new customization opportunities in the field of anatomic models.
89解剖模型在医学领域发挥着重要作用。然而,在批量生产和3D打印模型中,软组织力学性能的呈现受到限制。在本研究中,使用了一种多材料3D打印机来打印具有经调整的力学和放射学特性的人体肝脏模型,目的是将打印模型与其打印材料和真实肝脏组织进行比较。主要目标是力学逼真度,而放射学相似性是次要目标。选择材料和内部结构,以使打印模型在拉伸性能方面类似于肝脏组织。该模型以33%的比例缩放并以40%的陀螺状填充率用软硅橡胶打印,硅油作为填充流体。打印后,对肝脏模型进行CT扫描。由于肝脏的形状与拉伸测试不兼容,还打印了拉伸测试样本。用与肝脏模型相同的内部结构打印了三个复制品,并用100%直线填充的硅橡胶又打印了三个复制品以进行比较。所有样本都在一个四步循环加载测试方案中进行测试,以比较弹性模量和能量耗散率。充液和全硅橡胶样本的初始弹性模量分别为0.26兆帕和0.37兆帕,在第二、第三和第四次加载循环中的能量耗散率分别为0.140、0.167、0.183和0.118、0.093、0.081。肝脏模型在CT扫描中显示为225±30亨氏单位(HU),比打印用的硅橡胶(340±50 HU)更接近真实人体肝脏(70±30 HU)。结果表明,与仅用硅橡胶打印相比,采用所提出的打印方法,肝脏模型在力学和放射学特性方面变得更加逼真。因此,已经证明这种打印方法在解剖模型领域带来了新的定制机会。