Estermann Sarah-Jane, Pahr Dieter H, Reisinger Andreas
Department Anatomy and Biomechanics, Karl Landsteiner University of Health Sciences, Dr.-Karl-Dorrek-Straße 30, 3500 Krems an der Donau, Austria; Austrian Center for Medical Innovation and Technology, Viktor Kaplan-Straße 2/1, 2700 Wiener Neustadt, Austria; Institute for Lightweight Design and Structural Biomechanics, TU-Wien, Getreidemarkt 9, 1060 Wien, Austria.
Department Anatomy and Biomechanics, Karl Landsteiner University of Health Sciences, Dr.-Karl-Dorrek-Straße 30, 3500 Krems an der Donau, Austria; Institute for Lightweight Design and Structural Biomechanics, TU-Wien, Getreidemarkt 9, 1060 Wien, Austria.
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2020 Dec;112:104038. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2020.104038. Epub 2020 Aug 24.
In order to create accurate anatomical models for medical training and research, mechanical properties of biological tissues need to be studied. However, non-linear and viscoelastic behaviour of most soft biological tissues complicates the evaluation of their mechanical properties. In the current study, a method for measuring hyperelasticity and viscoelasticity of bovine and porcine hepatic parenchyma in tension is presented. First, non-linear stress-stretch curves resulting from ramp loading and unloading, were interpreted based on a hyperelastic framework, using a Veronda-Westmann strain energy function. Strain-specific elastic moduli, such as initial stiffness E, were thereupon defined in certain parts of the stress-stretch curves. Furthermore, dissipated and stored energy density were calculated. Next, the viscoelastic nature of liver tissue was examined with two different methods: stress relaxation and dynamic cyclic testing. Both tests yielded dissipated and stored energy density, as well as loss tangent (tanδ), storage modulus (E), and loss modulus (E). In tension, stress relaxation was experimentally more convenient than dynamic cyclic testing. Thus we considered whether relaxation could be used for approximating the results of the cyclic tests. Regarding the resulting elastic moduli, initial stiffness was similar for porcine and bovine liver (E∼30kPa), while porcine liver was stiffer for higher strains. Comparing stress relaxation with dynamic cyclic testing, tanδ of porcine and bovine liver was the same for both methods (tanδ=0.05-0.25 at 1 Hz). Storage and loss moduli matched well for bovine, but not as well for porcine tissue. In conclusion, the utilized Veronda-Westmann model was appropriate for representing the hyperelasticity of liver tissue seen in ramp tests. Concerning viscoelasticity, both chosen testing methods - stress relaxation and dynamic cyclic testing - yielded comparable results for E, E, and tanδ, as long as elasticity non-linearities were heeded. The here presented method provides novel insight into the tensile viscoelastic properties of hepatic tissue, and provides guidelines for convenient evaluation of soft tissue mechanical properties.
为了创建用于医学培训和研究的精确解剖模型,需要研究生物组织的力学性能。然而,大多数软生物组织的非线性和粘弹性行为使得其力学性能的评估变得复杂。在当前的研究中,提出了一种在拉伸状态下测量牛和猪肝脏实质超弹性和粘弹性的方法。首先,基于超弹性框架,使用Veronda-Westmann应变能函数来解释由斜坡加载和卸载产生的非线性应力-应变曲线。随后在应力-应变曲线的某些部分定义了特定应变的弹性模量,如初始刚度E。此外,还计算了耗散能和储能密度。接下来,用两种不同的方法研究了肝组织的粘弹性:应力松弛和动态循环测试。两种测试都得出了耗散能和储能密度,以及损耗角正切(tanδ)、储能模量(E)和损耗模量(E)。在拉伸状态下,应力松弛在实验上比动态循环测试更方便。因此,我们考虑了松弛是否可用于近似循环测试的结果。关于所得的弹性模量,猪和牛肝脏的初始刚度相似(E∼30kPa),而在较高应变下猪肝脏更硬。将应力松弛与动态循环测试进行比较,猪和牛肝脏的tanδ在两种方法中是相同的(在1Hz时tanδ=0.05-0.25)。牛组织的储能模量和损耗模量匹配良好,但猪组织的匹配效果没那么好。总之,所采用的Veronda-Westmann模型适合表示斜坡测试中观察到的肝组织超弹性。关于粘弹性,只要注意弹性非线性,两种选定的测试方法——应力松弛和动态循环测试——对于E、E和tanδ都产生了可比的结果。本文提出的方法为肝组织的拉伸粘弹性特性提供了新的见解,并为软组织力学性能的便捷评估提供了指导。