Jackson S H, Shah K, Turner P
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1986;30(3):313-7. doi: 10.1007/BF00541535.
The pharmacokinetics of two slow release theophylline preparations "Theo-Dur" (T) containing theophylline only and "Phyllocontin" (P) containing aminophylline have been compared in 12 patients with asthma. Each patient received both treatments in random order. The dose of treatment administered 12 hourly was increased or decreased to produce plasma theophylline concentrations of 10-20 mg/l at clinic visits normally 7 to 8 h after dosing. Pharmacokinetic studies were carried out after at least one week's treatment with this dose. After the first study day patients were crossed over to the second treatment at a dosage providing a similar amount of theophylline. They returned for a second study day after at least one week. Comparison of the dose corrected AUC, time to peak concentrations, within patient coefficients of variation (CV), number of concentration time points falling within 25% of Cmax and percentage fluctuations in plasma concentration showed no significant differences between the two preparations.
在12例哮喘患者中比较了两种缓释茶碱制剂的药代动力学:仅含茶碱的“Theo-Dur”(T)和含氨茶碱的“Phyllocontin”(P)。每位患者按随机顺序接受两种治疗。每12小时给药一次,根据临床访视时(通常在给药后7至8小时)血浆茶碱浓度将剂量增加或减少,以使血浆茶碱浓度达到10 - 20mg/L。在使用该剂量治疗至少一周后进行药代动力学研究。在第一个研究日之后,患者以提供相似量茶碱的剂量交叉接受第二种治疗。至少一周后他们返回进行第二个研究日。对剂量校正的AUC、达峰时间、患者内变异系数(CV)、落在Cmax的25%范围内的浓度-时间点数以及血浆浓度的波动百分比进行比较,结果显示两种制剂之间无显著差异。