Menendez R, Kelly H W, Howick J, McWilliams B C
Am J Dis Child. 1983 May;137(5):469-73.
The serum theophylline concentration profiles and clinical efficacy of two sustained-release theophylline tablets (Quibron-T/SR and Theo-Dur) were compared in 13 asthmatic children requiring continuous theophylline therapy. Quibron-T/SR and Theo-Dur, administered every 12 hours in the same dose for one week, were evaluated in a multiple-dose randomized crossover study. At the end of each week, serial serum theophylline concentrations were measured and spirometry and body plethysmography were performed. No significant differences between treatments were found in bioavailability, adverse effects, clinical symptom scores, or pulmonary function in spite of the fact that Quibron-T/SR and Theo-Dur produced significantly different serum theophylline concentration profiles as measured by a mean percent of fluctuation in serum theophylline levels of 143 for Quibron-T/SR and 65.7 for Theo-Dur. Over the short term of the study the pharmacokinetic differences did not produce significant differences in clinical efficacy.
在13名需要持续进行茶碱治疗的哮喘儿童中,比较了两种缓释茶碱片(Quibron-T/SR和Theo-Dur)的血清茶碱浓度曲线和临床疗效。在一项多剂量随机交叉研究中,对Quibron-T/SR和Theo-Dur进行评估,二者均每12小时服用相同剂量,持续一周。在每周结束时,测量系列血清茶碱浓度,并进行肺功能测定和体容积描记法检查。尽管Quibron-T/SR和Theo-Dur产生的血清茶碱浓度曲线存在显著差异,Quibron-T/SR的血清茶碱水平波动平均百分比为143,Theo-Dur为65.7,但在生物利用度、不良反应、临床症状评分或肺功能方面,两种治疗方法之间未发现显著差异。在该研究的短期内,药代动力学差异并未导致临床疗效出现显著差异。