Hendeles L, Iafrate R P, Weinberger M
Clin Pharmacokinet. 1984 Mar-Apr;9(2):95-135. doi: 10.2165/00003088-198409020-00001.
In order to achieve the greatest chance for maximum benefit from theophylline in the management of chronic asthma, the serum concentration should be maintained in the therapeutic range of 10 to 20 micrograms/ml. Conventional rapid release formulations produce excessive fluctuations in serum concentrations that can result in variability in clinical response between doses. In contrast, slow release formulations have the potential to achieve relatively constant serum concentrations with 12-hour dosing intervals, thus providing around-the-clock stabilisation of the hyper-reactive airways that characterise chronic asthma. Furthermore, the decreased frequency of dosing with these formulations can improve patient compliance. However, significant differences in rate and extent of absorption exist between the available formulations. Single-dose bioavailability studies comparing a slow release product with an oral solution or plain uncoated tablet in a crossover design permit examination of the rate and extent of absorption. Comparison of a slow release product with an oral reference following multiple doses at steady-state permits examination of the extent but generally not rate of absorption. The mean fraction absorbed-time profile, calculated from a modification of the Wagner-Nelson equation, is a process-independent method of comparing rates of absorption of different products after single doses. A prospective study in 14 children with chronic asthma has demonstrated that this modified equation, when rearranged to iteratively solve for serum concentrations, can accurately predict steady-state serum concentrations for different dosing intervals in patient populations with different rates of elimination. When slow release products are compared in this manner at 8- or 12-hour dosing intervals for patients with slow elimination, clinically relevant differences between brands are not apparent. However, in patients with rapid elimination, i.e. children, cigarette smokers, and 25% of non-smoking adults, application of this method shows that only some formulations (i.e. 'Slo-Bid Gyrocaps' and 'Theo-Dur', which is also marketed under different brand names names such as 'Sustaire', 'Pulmi-Dur' and 'Theolin Retard') can maintain serum concentrations within the therapeutic range for an entire 12-hour dosing interval. More rapidly absorbed slow release products must be administered at 8-hour dosing intervals in patients with rapid elimination, despite promotional claims to the contrary. Current products promoted for once-a-day administration are clinically inadequate because of incomplete and erratic absorption, and/or excessive serum concentration fluctuations.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
为了在慢性哮喘的治疗中最大程度地从茶碱中获益,血清浓度应维持在10至20微克/毫升的治疗范围内。传统的速释制剂会使血清浓度产生过度波动,这可能导致不同剂量之间临床反应的变异性。相比之下,缓释制剂有潜力通过12小时的给药间隔实现相对恒定的血清浓度,从而为慢性哮喘所特有的高反应性气道提供全天候的稳定作用。此外,这些制剂给药频率的降低可以提高患者的依从性。然而,现有制剂在吸收速率和程度上存在显著差异。采用交叉设计对一种缓释产品与口服溶液或普通未包衣片剂进行单剂量生物利用度研究,可以考察吸收速率和程度。在稳态下多次给药后,将一种缓释产品与口服参比制剂进行比较,可以考察吸收程度,但通常无法考察吸收速率。根据对Wagner-Nelson方程的修正计算得出的平均吸收分数-时间曲线,是一种与过程无关的单剂量后比较不同产品吸收速率的方法。一项针对14名慢性哮喘儿童的前瞻性研究表明,当将这个修正方程重新排列以迭代求解血清浓度时,它可以准确预测不同消除速率患者群体在不同给药间隔下的稳态血清浓度。对于消除缓慢的患者,以这种方式在8或12小时给药间隔下比较缓释产品时,各品牌之间临床上相关的差异并不明显。然而,在消除迅速的患者中,即儿童、吸烟者以及25%的非吸烟成年人中,应用这种方法表明只有一些制剂(即“Slo-Bid Gyrocaps”和“Theo-Dur”,后者也以“Sustaire”、“Pulmi-Dur”和“Theolin Retard”等不同品牌名称销售)能够在整个12小时给药间隔内将血清浓度维持在治疗范围内。对于消除迅速的患者,尽管有相反的促销宣称,但吸收更快的缓释产品必须每8小时给药一次。目前宣传为每日一次给药的产品在临床上并不适用,因为吸收不完全且不稳定,和/或血清浓度波动过大。(摘要截选至400字)