• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

语篇阅读理解中的预设范围。

On the scope of presupposition in discourse reading comprehension.

机构信息

School of Humanities, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.

Institute of Linguistics, Shanghai International Studies University, Shanghai, China.

出版信息

Acta Psychol (Amst). 2023 Jul;237:103955. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2023.103955. Epub 2023 Jun 14.

DOI:10.1016/j.actpsy.2023.103955
PMID:37327659
Abstract

referential relationships can be communicated through presupposition. The presupposition trigger (also) in Jiayan also bought eggs exerts a pragmatic constraint that besides the object, the verb constrains additional and alternative referents. Our study provided a novel set of evidence that the reader preferred larger- over smaller-sized sets for the scope of presupposition in discourse comprehension. The structural hierarchy in smaller-sized sets and the earlier-mentioned structural details in larger-sized sets drove higher preference. Furthermore, readers' difference in their preference reflected their tendency to attend to discourse structural information. These findings are consistent with the multiple constraints hypothesis/the presupposition maximization principle hypothesis, rather than the local bias hypothesis. The present study enlightened the understanding of structural constraints on processing the number and the identity of presupposed referential information in discourse reading comprehension.

摘要

指称关系可以通过预设来传达。假设触发语(也)在“家严”中也买了鸡蛋,这对动词施加了一个语用限制,即除了对象之外,动词还限制了其他的替代指称。我们的研究提供了一组新的证据,表明读者在语篇理解中更喜欢大集合而非小集合来作为预设的范围。小集合中的结构层次和大集合中前面提到的结构细节推动了更高的偏好。此外,读者在偏好上的差异反映了他们关注语篇结构信息的倾向。这些发现与多约束假设/预设最大化原则假设一致,而与局部偏向假设不一致。本研究启示了对语篇阅读理解中预设指代信息数量和身份的结构约束的理解。

相似文献

1
On the scope of presupposition in discourse reading comprehension.语篇阅读理解中的预设范围。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2023 Jul;237:103955. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2023.103955. Epub 2023 Jun 14.
2
Pragmatic processing: An investigation of the (anti-)presuppositions of determiners using mouse-tracking.语用加工:使用鼠标追踪技术对限定词的(反)预设进行的研究。
Cognition. 2019 Dec;193:104024. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2019.104024. Epub 2019 Aug 12.
3
Capacity limitations of processing presuppositions triggered by determiners.限定词引发的预设处理的能力限制
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2020 Nov;211:103159. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2020.103159. Epub 2020 Nov 10.
4
Discourse integration guided by the 'question under discussion'.受“正在讨论的问题”引导的话语整合。
Cogn Psychol. 2012 Sep;65(2):352-79. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2012.04.001. Epub 2012 Jun 7.
5
Impacts of cognitive flexibility on central word identification: evidence from poor comprehenders' discourse comprehension of first graders with ADHD.认知灵活性对中心词识别的影响:来自 ADHD 一年级学生语篇理解困难的阅读理解者的证据。
Ann Dyslexia. 2023 Jul;73(2):314-335. doi: 10.1007/s11881-023-00280-w. Epub 2023 Mar 9.
6
Irony as a Test of the Presupposition-Denial Account: An ERP Study.作为预设否定理论检验的反讽:一项事件相关电位研究
J Psycholinguist Res. 2021 Dec;50(6):1321-1335. doi: 10.1007/s10936-021-09795-y. Epub 2021 Aug 20.
7
Predicting Definite and Indefinite Referents During Discourse Comprehension: Evidence from Event-Related Potentials.在语篇理解中预测确定和不确定指代:来自事件相关电位的证据。
Cogn Sci. 2022 Feb;46(2):e13092. doi: 10.1111/cogs.13092.
8
Semantic Relations Cause Interference in Spoken Language Comprehension When Using Repeated Definite References, Not Pronouns.当使用重复的定指而非代词时,语义关系会对口语理解造成干扰。
Front Psychol. 2016 Mar 1;7:214. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00214. eCollection 2016.
9
Discourse Context Immediately Overrides Gender Stereotypes during Discourse Reading: Evidence from ERPs.语篇阅读过程中语篇语境会立即超越性别刻板印象:来自事件相关电位的证据。
Brain Sci. 2023 Feb 23;13(3):387. doi: 10.3390/brainsci13030387.
10
Validating presupposed versus focused text information.验证预设文本信息与重点文本信息。
Mem Cognit. 2017 Apr;45(3):456-479. doi: 10.3758/s13421-016-0673-0.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploring Pragmatic Factors on the Logical Relationships of Conditional Reasoning: A Study of Counterfactual and Hypothetical Conditionals.探索语用因素对条件推理逻辑关系的影响:一项关于反事实条件句和假设条件句的研究。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2024 Aug 8;14(8):686. doi: 10.3390/bs14080686.
2
Editorial: Psychological and neurocognitive mechanisms of presupposition processing in speech and language processing.社论:言语和语言处理中预设处理的心理和神经认知机制
Front Psychol. 2023 Oct 30;14:1289045. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1289045. eCollection 2023.