• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

ACS 患者医院资源利用的差异:急诊科是否需要进行更先进的 NSTEMI 风险分层?

Variation in ACS patient hospital resource utilization: Is it time for advanced NSTEMI risk stratification in the ED?

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, 900 Welch Road, Ste 350, Palo Alto, CA 94304, United States of America.

Department of Emergency Medicine, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, United States of America.

出版信息

Am J Emerg Med. 2023 Aug;70:171-174. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2023.05.028. Epub 2023 May 26.

DOI:10.1016/j.ajem.2023.05.028
PMID:37327683
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

A majority of patients who experience acute coronary syndrome (ACS) initially receive care in the emergency department (ED). Guidelines for care of patients experiencing ACS, specifically ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) are well defined. We examine the utilization of hospital resources between patients with NSTEMI as compared to STEMI and unstable angina (UA). We then make the case that as NSTEMI patients are the majority of ACS cases, there is a great opportunity to risk stratify these patients in the emergency department.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We examined hospital resource utilization measure between those with STEMI, NSTEMI, and UA. These included hospital length of stay (LOS), any intensive care unit (ICU) care time, and in-hospital mortality.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

The sample included 284,945 adult ED patients, of whom 1195 experienced ACS. Among the latter, 978 (70%) were diagnosed with NSTEMI, 225 (16%) with STEMI, and 194 with UA (14%). We observed 79.1% of STEMI patients receiving ICU care. 14.4% among NSTEMI patients, and 9.3% among UA patients. NSTEMI patients' mean hospital LOS was 3.7 days. This was shorter than that of non-ACS patients 4.75 days and UA patients 2.99. In-hospital mortality for NSTEMI was 1.6%, compared to, 4.4% for those with STEMI patients and 0% for UA. There are recommendations for risk stratification among NSTEMI patients to evaluate risk for major adverse cardiac events (MACE) that can be used in the ED to guide admission decisions and use of ICU care, thus optimizing care for a majority of ACS patients.

摘要

目的

大多数经历急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)的患者最初在急诊科(ED)接受治疗。针对 ACS 患者的护理指南,特别是 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI),已有明确规定。我们比较了非 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死(NSTEMI)与 STEMI 和不稳定型心绞痛(UA)患者之间的医院资源利用情况。然后,我们认为 NSTEMI 患者是 ACS 患者中的大多数,因此有很大的机会在急诊科对这些患者进行风险分层。

材料和方法

我们检查了 STEMI、NSTEMI 和 UA 患者之间的医院资源利用情况。这些措施包括住院时间(LOS)、任何 ICU 护理时间和院内死亡率。

结果与结论

样本包括 284945 名成年 ED 患者,其中 1195 例患有 ACS。在后者中,978 例(70%)被诊断为 NSTEMI,225 例(16%)为 STEMI,194 例为 UA(14%)。我们观察到 79.1%的 STEMI 患者接受了 ICU 护理。NSTEMI 患者中有 14.4%,UA 患者中有 9.3%。NSTEMI 患者的平均住院时间为 3.7 天。这短于非 ACS 患者的 4.75 天和 UA 患者的 2.99 天。NSTEMI 患者的院内死亡率为 1.6%,而 STEMI 患者为 4.4%,UA 患者为 0%。对于 NSTEMI 患者,有风险分层的建议用于评估主要不良心脏事件(MACE)的风险,这些建议可在 ED 中用于指导入院决策和 ICU 护理的使用,从而优化大多数 ACS 患者的护理。

相似文献

1
Variation in ACS patient hospital resource utilization: Is it time for advanced NSTEMI risk stratification in the ED?ACS 患者医院资源利用的差异:急诊科是否需要进行更先进的 NSTEMI 风险分层?
Am J Emerg Med. 2023 Aug;70:171-174. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2023.05.028. Epub 2023 May 26.
2
Nationwide trends in acute coronary syndrome by subtype in New Zealand 2006-2016.新西兰 2006-2016 年急性冠状动脉综合征亚型的全国趋势。
Heart. 2020 Feb;106(3):221-227. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2019-315655. Epub 2019 Oct 31.
3
Epidemiology and risk factors of patients with types of acute coronary syndrome presenting to a tertiary care hospital in Sri Lanka.斯里兰卡一家三级护理医院收治的不同类型急性冠脉综合征患者的流行病学和危险因素。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2019 Oct 21;19(1):229. doi: 10.1186/s12872-019-1217-x.
4
Retrospective review of non-ST segment elevation acute coronary syndrome presenting to the emergency department of a major tertiary center in Saudi Arabia.对沙特阿拉伯一家大型三级中心急诊科收治的非ST段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征进行回顾性研究。
Ann Saudi Med. 2024 Jan-Feb;44(1):1-10. doi: 10.5144/0256-4947.2024.1. Epub 2024 Feb 1.
5
Survey of Assessment and MAnagement of CoRonary Heart Disease PaTients (SMART) in India.印度冠心病患者评估与管理调查(SMART)
J Assoc Physicians India. 2017 Jul;65(7):22-26.
6
Contemporary NSTEMI management: the role of the hospitalist.当代非ST段抬高型心肌梗死的管理:住院医师的作用。
Hosp Pract (1995). 2020 Feb;48(1):1-11. doi: 10.1080/21548331.2020.1701329. Epub 2020 Feb 20.
7
Incidence and Outcomes of Acute Coronary Syndrome After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后急性冠状动脉综合征的发生率和结局。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Apr 27;13(8):938-950. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2019.11.027. Epub 2020 Feb 12.
8
Frequency of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, non-ST-segment myocardial infarction, and unstable angina: results from a Southwest Chinese Registry.ST段抬高型心肌梗死、非ST段抬高型心肌梗死及不稳定型心绞痛的发病率:一项中国西南地区注册研究的结果
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2021 Mar 30;22(1):239-245. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm.2021.01.103.
9
[Management of acute coronary syndrome without ST-segment elevation].非ST段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征的管理
Herz. 2022 Aug;47(4):381-392. doi: 10.1007/s00059-022-05120-y. Epub 2022 Jun 14.
10
Outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndrome in a referral hospital in sub-Saharan Africa.撒哈拉以南非洲一家转诊医院急性冠状动脉综合征患者的治疗结果。
Cardiovasc J Afr. 2019;30(1):29-33. doi: 10.5830/CVJA-2018-066. Epub 2018 Dec 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Acute Coronary Syndrome: Treatment Strategies and Outcomes in Patients Admitted to a Tertiary Care Hospital in Palestine.急性冠状动脉综合征:巴勒斯坦一家三级医疗医院收治患者的治疗策略与结果
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2024 Jun 12;18:1173-1181. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S467924. eCollection 2024.