Suppr超能文献

一项范围综述确定了在观察性研究中报告健康公平性需要共识指导的必要性。

A scoping review establishes need for consensus guidance on reporting health equity in observational studies.

机构信息

Michael G. DeGroote Institute for Pain Research and Care, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4L8, Canada.

Bruyère Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario K1R 6M1, Canada.

出版信息

J Clin Epidemiol. 2023 Aug;160:126-140. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2023.06.009. Epub 2023 Jun 15.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the support from the available guidance on reporting of health equity in research for our candidate items and to identify additional items for the Strengthening Reporting of Observational studies in Epidemiology-Equity extension.

STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING

We conducted a scoping review by searching Embase, MEDLINE, CINAHL, Cochrane Methodology Register, LILACS, and Caribbean Center on Health Sciences Information up to January 2022. We also searched reference lists and gray literature for additional resources. We included guidance and assessments (hereafter termed "resources") related to conduct and/or reporting for any type of health research with or about people experiencing health inequity.

RESULTS

We included 34 resources, which supported one or more candidate items or contributed to new items about health equity reporting in observational research. Each candidate item was supported by a median of six (range: 1-15) resources. In addition, 12 resources suggested 13 new items, such as "report the background of investigators".

CONCLUSION

Existing resources for reporting health equity in observational studies aligned with our interim checklist of candidate items. We also identified additional items that will be considered in the development of a consensus-based and evidence-based guideline for reporting health equity in observational studies.

摘要

目的

评估现有关于健康公平性报告的指南对我们候选项目的支持程度,并确定加强观察性研究报告中的流行病学公平性扩展的其他项目。

研究设计和设置

我们通过搜索 Embase、MEDLINE、CINAHL、Cochrane 方法学登记处、LILACS 和加勒比卫生科学信息中心,对截至 2022 年 1 月的研究进行了范围综述。我们还搜索了参考文献列表和灰色文献以获取其他资源。我们纳入了与任何类型的健康研究(包括或涉及经历健康不公平的人)的进行和/或报告相关的指导和评估(以下简称“资源”)。

结果

我们纳入了 34 项资源,这些资源支持了一个或多个候选项目,或为观察性研究中的健康公平性报告提出了新的项目。每个候选项目都得到了中位数为 6 项(范围:1-15)资源的支持。此外,12 项资源提出了 13 个新的项目,例如“报告研究人员的背景”。

结论

现有的观察性研究报告健康公平性的资源与我们的候选项目临时清单一致。我们还确定了其他将在制定基于共识和基于证据的观察性研究报告健康公平性指南中考虑的项目。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验