Fan Fang-Fang, Ge Xing, Liu Dan-Dan, Xu Teng-Yu, Wang Rui-Xue, Chen Xiao-Ya, Li Su-Yan
The Affiliated Xuzhou Municipal Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou 221000, Jiangsu Province, China.
Department of Ophthalmology, Xuzhou First People's Hospital, Xuzhou 221000, Jiangsu Province, China.
Int J Ophthalmol. 2023 Jun 18;16(6):897-903. doi: 10.18240/ijo.2023.06.10. eCollection 2023.
To compare the clinical efficacy and safety of ultrasonic cycloplasty (UCP) Ahmed glaucoma drainage valve implantation (ADV) in addition to intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) for treatment of fundus disease-related neovascular glaucoma (NVG).
A total of 43 patients (45 eyes) with NVG secondary to fundus diseases underwent anti-VEGF combined with UCP or ADV from August 2020 to March 2022 were enrolled in this retrospective cohort study. Of them, 14 patients (15 eyes) were treated with both UCP and anti-VEGF as the UCP group and 29 patients (30 eyes) treated with both ADV and anti-VEGF as the ADV group. The success of the treatment was defined as intraocular pressure (IOP) between 11-20 mm Hg with or without using IOP-lowering drugs. IOP measurement, IOP lowering drugs at baseline and follow-ups period and complications were recorded.
The average age was 63.03±9.95 and 52.27±12.89y in ADV and UCP groups, respectively (=1.947). The fundus pathology included proliferative diabetic retinopathy in 42 eyes and retinal vein occlusion in 3 eyes. All eyes in both groups achieved successful treatment at 3mo. While the success rate was 90.0% (27/30) in the ADV group and 86.7% (13/15) in the UCP group at the last follow-up of 6mo (>0.05). IOP was significantly lower with reduction of drug use than the baseline in both groups (both <0.05). And the ADV group needed fewer anti-glaucoma drops than the UCP group from 1d to 3mo. The comfort scores of patients in the ADV group were significantly lower than those in the UCP group in the first week after the operation (<0.05).
UCP is an alternative to the ADV with the same efficacy but non-invasive for the treatment of NVG.
比较超声睫状体成形术(UCP)联合玻璃体内注射抗血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)与艾哈迈德青光眼引流阀植入术(ADV)联合玻璃体内注射抗VEGF治疗眼底疾病相关性新生血管性青光眼(NVG)的临床疗效和安全性。
本回顾性队列研究纳入了2020年8月至2022年3月期间43例(45只眼)因眼底疾病继发NVG并接受抗VEGF联合UCP或ADV治疗的患者。其中,14例患者(15只眼)接受UCP联合抗VEGF治疗作为UCP组,29例患者(30只眼)接受ADV联合抗VEGF治疗作为ADV组。治疗成功定义为眼压(IOP)在11 - 20 mmHg之间,无论是否使用降眼压药物。记录眼压测量值、基线及随访期间的降眼压药物使用情况和并发症。
ADV组和UCP组的平均年龄分别为63.03±9.95岁和52.27±12.89岁(t = 1.947)。眼底病变包括42只眼的增殖性糖尿病视网膜病变和3只眼的视网膜静脉阻塞。两组所有眼在3个月时均实现成功治疗。在6个月的最后随访时,ADV组成功率为90.0%(27/30),UCP组为86.7%(13/15)(P>0.05)。两组眼压均显著低于基线水平,且药物使用减少(均P<0.05)。在术后1天至3个月期间,ADV组所需的抗青光眼滴眼液比UCP组少。ADV组患者术后第一周的舒适度评分显著低于UCP组(P<0.05)。
UCP是ADV的一种替代方法,治疗NVG疗效相同但具有非侵入性。