Rauscher Emily, Shen Yifan
Brown University.
AJS. 2022 Jul;128(1):189-223. doi: 10.1086/719956.
The equity-efficiency trade-off and cumulative return theories predict larger returns to school spending in areas with higher previous investment in children. Equity-not efficiency-is therefore used to justify progressive school funding: spending more in communities with fewer financial resources. Yet it remains unclear how returns to school spending vary across areas by previous investment. Using county-level panel data for 2009-18 from the Stanford Education Data Archive, the Census Finance Survey, and National Vital Statistics, the authors estimate achievement returns to school spending and test whether returns vary between counties with low and high levels of initial human capital (measured as birth weight), child poverty, and previous spending. Spending returns are higher among counties with low previous investment (counties that also have a high percentage of Black students). Evidence of diminishing returns by previous investment documents another way that schools increase equality and establishes another argument for progressive school funding: efficiency.
公平与效率的权衡以及累积回报理论预测,在以往对儿童投资较高的地区,学校支出的回报更大。因此,公平而非效率被用来为累进式学校资金提供正当理由:即在财政资源较少的社区投入更多资金。然而,目前尚不清楚学校支出的回报如何因以往投资而在不同地区有所差异。作者利用斯坦福教育数据档案、人口普查金融调查和国家 Vital Statistics 提供的 2009 - 2018 年县级面板数据,估算了学校支出的成就回报,并检验了回报在初始人力资本水平(以出生体重衡量)、儿童贫困程度和以往支出水平较低和较高的县之间是否存在差异。在以往投资较低的县(这些县黑人学生比例也较高),支出回报更高。以往投资回报递减的证据证明了学校增加平等的另一种方式,并为累进式学校资金提供了另一个论据:效率。