van Boven Michiel, van Dorp Christiaan H, Westerhof Ilse, Jaddoe Vincent, Heuvelman Valerie, Duijts Liesbeth, Fourie Elandri, Sluiter-Post Judith, van Houten Marlies A, Badoux Paul, Euser Sjoerd, Herpers Bjorn, Eggink Dirk, de Hoog Marieke, Boom Trisja, Wildenbeest Joanne, Bont Louis, Rozhnov Ganna, Bonten Marc J, Kretzschmar Mirjam E, Bruijning-Verhagen Patricia
Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Center for Complex Systems Studies (CCSS), Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
medRxiv. 2023 Jun 5:2023.06.02.23290879. doi: 10.1101/2023.06.02.23290879.
Household studies provide an efficient means to study transmission of infectious diseases, enabling estimation of individual susceptibility and infectivity. A main inclusion criterion in such studies is often the presence of an infected person. This precludes estimation of the hazards of pathogen introduction into the household. Here we use data from a prospective household-based study to estimate SARS-CoV-2 age- and time-dependent household introduction hazards together with within household transmission rates in the Netherlands from August 2020 to August 2021. Introduction hazards and within-household transmission rates are estimated with penalized splines and stochastic epidemic models, respectively. The estimated hazard of introduction of SARS-CoV-2 in the households was lower for children (0-12 years) than for adults (relative hazard: 0.62; 95%CrI: 0.34-1.0). Estimated introduction hazards peaked in mid October 2020, mid December 2020, and mid April 2021, preceding peaks in hospital admissions by 1-2 weeks. The best fitting transmission models include increased infectivity of children relative to adults and adolescents, such that the estimated child-to-child transmission probability (0.62; 95%CrI: 0.40-0.81) was considerably higher than the adult-to-adult transmission probability (0.12; 95%CrI: 0.057-0.19). Scenario analyses show that vaccination of adults could have strongly reduced infection attack rates in households and that adding adolescent vaccination would have offered limited added benefit.
家庭研究为研究传染病传播提供了一种有效的方法,能够估计个体的易感性和传染性。此类研究的一个主要纳入标准通常是有感染者存在。这就排除了对病原体引入家庭的风险进行估计的可能性。在此,我们使用一项基于家庭的前瞻性研究的数据,来估计2020年8月至2021年8月期间荷兰SARS-CoV-2在家庭中的年龄和时间依赖性引入风险以及家庭内传播率。引入风险和家庭内传播率分别使用惩罚样条法和随机流行模型进行估计。SARS-CoV-2引入家庭的估计风险在儿童(0至12岁)中低于成年人(相对风险:0.62;95%可信区间:0.34至1.0)。估计的引入风险在2020年10月中旬、2020年12月中旬和2021年4月中旬达到峰值,比住院人数峰值提前1至2周。最佳拟合传播模型包括儿童相对于成年人和青少年的传染性增加,因此估计的儿童之间的传播概率(0.62;95%可信区间:0.40至0.81)远高于成年人之间的传播概率(0.12;95%可信区间:0.057至0.19)。情景分析表明,成年人接种疫苗可大幅降低家庭中的感染发病率,而增加青少年接种疫苗带来的额外益处有限。