Department of Infectious Diseases, The University of Melbourne Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity Melbourne Victoria Australia.
Centre for Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population & Global Health The University of Melbourne Melbourne Victoria Australia.
Influenza Other Respir Viruses. 2023 Jun 15;17(6):e13165. doi: 10.1111/irv.13165. eCollection 2023 Jun.
Household transmission investigations (HHTIs) contribute timely epidemiologic knowledge in response to emerging pathogens. HHTIs conducted in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020-21 reported variable methodological approaches, producing epidemiological estimates that vary in meaning, precision and accuracy. Because specific tools to assist with the optimal design and critical appraisal of HHTIs are not available, the aggregation and pooling of inferences from HHTIs to inform policy and interventions may be challenging.
In this manuscript, we discuss key aspects of the HHTI design, provide recommendations for the reporting of these studies and propose an appraisal tool that contributes to the optimal design and critical appraisal of HHTIs.
The appraisal tool consists of 12 questions that explore 10 aspects of HHTIs and can be answered 'yes', 'no' or 'unclear'. We provide an example of the use of this tool in the context of a systematic review that aimed to quantify the household secondary attack rate from HHTIs.
We seek to fill a gap in the epidemiologic literature and contribute to standardised HHTI approaches across settings to achieve richer and more informative datasets.
家庭传播调查(HHTIs)有助于及时提供有关新兴病原体的流行病学知识。2020-2021 年 COVID-19 大流行期间进行的 HHTIs 采用了不同的方法学方法,产生的流行病学估计值在含义、精度和准确性上存在差异。由于没有特定的工具来协助 HHTI 的最佳设计和批判性评估,因此从 HHTIs 中汇总和组合推论以提供政策和干预措施可能具有挑战性。
在本文中,我们讨论了 HHTI 设计的关键方面,为这些研究的报告提供了建议,并提出了一个评估工具,有助于 HHTI 的最佳设计和批判性评估。
该评估工具由 12 个问题组成,探讨了 HHTIs 的 10 个方面,可以回答“是”、“否”或“不清楚”。我们提供了一个在系统评价背景下使用该工具的示例,该评价旨在从 HHTIs 中量化家庭二次攻击率。
我们旨在填补流行病学文献中的空白,并为跨环境的标准化 HHTI 方法做出贡献,以实现更丰富和更具信息量的数据集。