Department of Human Genetics, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet. 2024 Jan;195(1):e32951. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.b.32951. Epub 2023 Jun 19.
The dense co-occurrence of psychiatric disorders questions the categorical classification tradition and motivates efforts to establish dimensional constructs with neurobiological foundations that transcend diagnostic boundaries. In this study, we examined the genetic liability for eight major psychiatric disorder phenotypes under both a disorder-specific and a transdiagnostic framework. The study sample (n = 513) was deeply phenotyped, consisting of 452 patients from tertiary care with mood disorders, anxiety disorders (ANX), attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), autism spectrum disorders, and/or substance use disorders (SUD) and 61 unaffected comparison individuals. We computed subject-specific polygenic risk score (PRS) profiles and assessed their associations with psychiatric diagnoses, comorbidity status, as well as cross-disorder behavioral dimensions derived from a rich battery of psychopathology assessments. High PRSs for depression were unselectively associated with the diagnosis of SUD, ADHD, ANX, and mood disorders (p < 1e-4). In the dimensional approach, four distinct functional domains were uncovered, namely the negative valence, social, cognitive, and regulatory systems, closely matching the major functional domains proposed by the Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) framework. Critically, the genetic predisposition for depression was selectively reflected in the functional aspect of negative valence systems (R = 0.041, p = 5e-4) but not others. This study adds evidence to the ongoing discussion about the misalignment between current psychiatric nosology and the underlying psychiatric genetic etiology and underscores the effectiveness of the dimensional approach in both the functional characterization of psychiatric patients and the delineation of the genetic liability for psychiatric disorders.
精神障碍的高度共病现象质疑了分类传统,并促使人们努力建立具有神经生物学基础的维度结构,以超越诊断界限。在这项研究中,我们在特定障碍和跨诊断框架下检查了八种主要精神障碍表型的遗传易感性。研究样本(n=513)进行了深入的表型分析,包括来自三级护理的 452 名患有心境障碍、焦虑障碍(ANX)、注意缺陷/多动障碍(ADHD)、自闭症谱系障碍和/或物质使用障碍(SUD)的患者,以及 61 名未受影响的对照个体。我们计算了个体特异性多基因风险评分(PRS)图谱,并评估了它们与精神障碍诊断、共病状态以及从丰富的精神病理学评估中得出的跨障碍行为维度的关联。高抑郁 PRS 与 SUD、ADHD、ANX 和心境障碍的诊断无选择性相关(p<1e-4)。在维度方法中,发现了四个不同的功能域,即负性价、社会、认知和调节系统,与研究领域标准(RDoC)框架提出的主要功能域非常匹配。至关重要的是,抑郁的遗传倾向仅反映在负性价系统的功能方面(R=0.041,p=5e-4),而不是其他方面。这项研究为当前精神病理学与潜在的精神遗传病因之间的不匹配提供了证据,并强调了维度方法在精神障碍患者的功能特征和精神障碍遗传易感性的描述中的有效性。