Department of Radiology, Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Hempstead, NY.
Radiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center/Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
Medicine (Baltimore). 2023 May 19;102(20):e33817. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000033817.
The diagnosis of cardiac transthyretin amyloidosis can involve early or delayed 99mTc-pyrophosphate planar, single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT), and/or SPECT/CT imaging. We investigated whether image interpretations differed among modalities and time points. In this observational study, data were reviewed for 173 patients with suspected transthyretin amyloidosis who underwent planar and SPECT/CT 1 and 3 hours after radiopharmaceutical injection. Planar heart-to-contralateral lung ratios were calculated. Myocardial-to-rib uptake was independently scored on SPECT and SPECT/CT as follows: 0 (negative), 1 < rib (equivocal), 2 = rib (positive), or 3 > rib (positive), and the image quality was as follows:1 (poor), 2 (adequate), and 3 (good). Three-hour SPECT/CT readings were used as the reference standard against which the other readings were compared. Twenty-five percent of patients were positive (3-hour SPECT/CT score ≥ 2). Compared to 3-hour SPECT/CT readings, there was "fair agreement" (κ = .27 - .33) with SPECT, and "fair agreement" (κ = .23 - .31) with planar imaging at 1 and 3 hours. More patients had abnormal SPECT and SPECT/CT than planar imaging (24-25% vs 16-17%, P < .007). There were more equivocal cases for 1 and 3 hours planar imaging than for 1 and 3 hours SPECT (71-73% vs 23-26%, P < .001) and 1 and 3 hours SPECT/CT (3-5%, P < .001). SPECT/CT image quality was higher at 3 hours than at 1 hour and higher than that on SPECT (P = .001). Three-hour SPECT/CT readings provided the highest number of definitive readings, had the highest image quality, and constituted the preferred protocol for evaluating unselected populations of patients that have a clinical suspicion of possible cardiac amyloidosis.
心脏转甲状腺素淀粉样变性的诊断可能包括早期或延迟的 99mTc-焦磷酸盐平面、单光子发射计算机断层扫描(SPECT)和/或 SPECT/CT 成像。我们研究了不同模式和时间点的图像解释是否存在差异。在这项观察性研究中,对 173 例疑似转甲状腺素淀粉样变性患者进行了回顾性分析,这些患者在放射性药物注射后 1 小时和 3 小时进行了平面和 SPECT/CT 检查。计算了平面心脏与对侧肺的比值。在 SPECT 和 SPECT/CT 上,心肌与肋骨摄取的独立评分如下:0(阴性)、1<肋骨(不确定)、2=肋骨(阳性)或 3>肋骨(阳性),图像质量如下:1(差)、2(适当)和 3(好)。将 3 小时 SPECT/CT 读数作为参考标准,与其他读数进行比较。25%的患者呈阳性(3 小时 SPECT/CT 评分≥2)。与 3 小时 SPECT/CT 读数相比,SPECT 具有“适度一致性”(κ=0.27-0.33),平面成像在 1 小时和 3 小时时具有“适度一致性”(κ=0.23-0.31)。与平面成像相比,SPECT 和 SPECT/CT 有更多的异常病例(24-25%比 16-17%,P<0.007)。1 小时和 3 小时平面成像的不确定病例多于 SPECT(71-73%比 23-26%,P<0.001)和 SPECT/CT(3-5%,P<0.001)。与 1 小时相比,3 小时 SPECT/CT 的图像质量更高,并且高于 SPECT(P=0.001)。3 小时 SPECT/CT 读数提供了最多的明确读数,具有最高的图像质量,是评估具有可能心脏淀粉样变性临床怀疑的未选择患者群体的首选方案。