Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Verona University Hospital, Piazzale A. Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy.
Division of Cardiology, University of Verona, Piazzale A. Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy.
Clin Res Cardiol. 2023 Sep;112(9):1331-1342. doi: 10.1007/s00392-023-02243-y. Epub 2023 Jun 20.
The risk of vessel-oriented cardiac adverse events (VOCE) in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) undergoing intracoronary physiology-guided coronary revascularization is poorly defined. The purpose of this work is to evaluate the risk of VOCE in patients with and without DM in whom percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) was performed or deferred based on pressure-wire functional assessment.
This is a retrospective analysis of a multicenter registry of patients evaluated with fractional flow reserve (FFR) and/or non-hyperaemic pressure ratio (NHPR). Primary endpoint was a composite of VOCE including cardiac death, vessel-related myocardial infarction (MI), and ischemia-driven target vessel revascularization (TVR).
A large cohort of 2828 patients with 3353 coronary lesions was analysed to assess the risk of VOCE at long-term follow-up (23 [14-36] months). Non-insulin-dependent-DM (NIDDM) was not associated with the primary endpoint in the overall cohort (adjusted Hazard Ratio [aHR] 1.18, 95% CI 0.87-1.59, P = 0.276) or in patients with coronary lesions treated with PCI (aHR = 1.30, 95% CI 0.78-2.16, P = 0.314). Conversely, insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM) demonstrated an increased risk of VOCE in the overall cohort (aHR 1.76, 95% CI 1.07-2.91, P = 0.027), but not in coronary lesions undergoing PCI (aHR 1.26, 95% CI 0.50-3.16, P = 0.621). Importantly, in coronary lesions deferred after functional assessment IDDM (aHR 2.77, 95% CI 1.11-6.93, P = 0.029) but not NIDDM (aHR = 0.94, 95% CI 0.61-1.44, P = 0.776) was significantly associated with the risk of VOCE. IDDM caused a significant effect modification of FFR-based risk stratification (P for interaction < 0.001).
Overall, DM was not associated with an increased risk of VOCE in patients undergoing physiology-guided coronary revascularization. However, IDDM represents a phenotype at high risk of VOCE.
患有糖尿病(DM)的患者行冠状动脉内生理学指导的冠状动脉血运重建术发生以血管为导向的心脏不良事件(VOCE)的风险尚不清楚。本研究旨在评估基于压力导丝功能评估行或延迟行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的患者中,有无 DM 患者发生 VOCE 的风险。
这是对接受血流储备分数(FFR)和/或非充血压力比(NHPR)评估的多中心患者注册研究的回顾性分析。主要终点是包括心源性死亡、与血管相关的心肌梗死(MI)和缺血驱动的靶血管血运重建(TVR)在内的 VOCE 复合终点。
分析了 2828 例患者的 3353 条冠状动脉病变,以评估长期随访(23 [14-36] 个月)时 VOCE 的风险。非胰岛素依赖型糖尿病(NIDDM)在整个队列中与主要终点无关(调整后的危险比 [aHR] 1.18,95%CI 0.87-1.59,P=0.276)或在接受 PCI 治疗的冠状动脉病变患者中也无关(aHR=1.30,95%CI 0.78-2.16,P=0.314)。相反,胰岛素依赖型糖尿病(IDDM)在整个队列中 VOCE 风险增加(aHR 1.76,95%CI 1.07-2.91,P=0.027),但在接受 PCI 的冠状动脉病变中无此风险(aHR 1.26,95%CI 0.50-3.16,P=0.621)。重要的是,在功能评估后延迟的冠状动脉病变中,IDDM(aHR 2.77,95%CI 1.11-6.93,P=0.029)而不是 NIDDM(aHR=0.94,95%CI 0.61-1.44,P=0.776)与 VOCE 风险显著相关。IDDM 显著改变了基于 FFR 的危险分层的效果(交互检验 P<0.001)。
总体而言,在接受生理学指导的冠状动脉血运重建术的患者中,DM 与 VOCE 风险增加无关。然而,IDDM 是 VOCE 高风险的表型。