• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项评估基于眼动追踪的双眼治疗与遮盖治疗儿童弱视疗效的前瞻性试验:一项初步研究。

A Prospective Trial to Assess the Efficacy of Eye-Tracking-Based Binocular Treatment versus Patching for Children's Amblyopia: A Pilot Study.

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, Eye and ENT Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China.

NHC Key Laboratory of Myopia (Fudan University), Shanghai, China.

出版信息

Semin Ophthalmol. 2023 Nov;38(8):761-767. doi: 10.1080/08820538.2023.2223275. Epub 2023 Jun 20.

DOI:10.1080/08820538.2023.2223275
PMID:37339068
Abstract

PURPOSE

To assess visual acuity (VA) and stereoacuity (SA) improvements in children with amblyopia treated with either binocular dichoptic treatment or patching treatment.

METHODS

In this pilot prospective coherent study, 34 participants between 4 and 9 years of age with unilateral anisometropic amblyopia and without history of prior amblyopia treatment were enrolled into three groups. Full treatment group (FTG;  = 12): participants were prescribed the binocular dichoptic treatment to watch for 90 minutes per day, 5 days a week. Part-time treatment group (PTTG;  = 8): participants were prescribed the same binocular treatment as FTG, 90 minutes per day, 3 days per week. Patching treatment group (PTG;  = 14): participants wore an adhesive patch over the dominant eye for 2 hours per day, 7 days per week. Amblyopic-eye distance visual acuity (DVA), near visual acuity (NVA) and SA were evaluated at baseline, 4, 8, and 12 weeks.

RESULTS

At 12 weeks, mean amblyopic-eye DVA improved 1.8 lines (95% CI, 1.1-2.5) in FTG, 1.5 lines (95% CI, 0.4-2.7) in PTTG and 3.0 lines (95% CI, 2.0-4.0) in PTG. The amblyopic-eye NVA improved 2.9 lines (95% CI, 2.4-3.5) in FTG, 1.7 lines (95% CI, 0.5-3.0) in PTTG and 2.8 lines (95% CI, 1.8-3.9) in PTG. The SA improved 0.38 log-arcseconds (95% CI, 0.24-0.53) in FTG, 0.59 log-arcseconds (95% CI, 0.36-0.82) in PTTG and 0.40 log-arcseconds (95% CI, 0.13-0.67) in PTG. No significant differences were found in DVA, NVA or SA improvement between FTG and PTG at 12 weeks.

CONCLUSIONS

VA and SA after binocular dichoptic treatment produced a similar therapeutic outcome to patching, suggesting a potential value for binocular therapy when treating anisometropic moderate degree of Children's amblyopia.

摘要

目的

评估双眼视差治疗或遮盖治疗弱视儿童的视力(VA)和立体视锐度(SA)改善情况。

方法

在这项前瞻性对照研究中,招募了 34 名年龄在 4 至 9 岁之间、有单侧屈光不正性弱视且无弱视治疗史的参与者,将其分为三组。全治疗组(FTG;n=12):参与者被规定每天观看 90 分钟的双眼视差治疗,每周 5 天。部分治疗组(PTTG;n=8):参与者接受与 FTG 相同的双眼治疗,每天 90 分钟,每周 3 天。遮盖治疗组(PTG;n=14):参与者每天戴 2 小时的粘性眼罩,每周 7 天。在基线、4、8 和 12 周时评估弱视眼的远距视力(DVA)、近距视力(NVA)和 SA。

结果

12 周时,FTG 组弱视眼 DVA 平均提高 1.8 行(95%CI,1.1-2.5),PTTG 组提高 1.5 行(95%CI,0.4-2.7),PTG 组提高 3.0 行(95%CI,2.0-4.0)。FTG 组弱视眼 NVA 提高 2.9 行(95%CI,2.4-3.5),PTTG 组提高 1.7 行(95%CI,0.5-3.0),PTG 组提高 2.8 行(95%CI,1.8-3.9)。FTG 组 SA 提高 0.38 对数弧秒(95%CI,0.24-0.53),PTTG 组提高 0.59 对数弧秒(95%CI,0.36-0.82),PTG 组提高 0.40 对数弧秒(95%CI,0.13-0.67)。12 周时,FTG 组和 PTG 组在 DVA、NVA 或 SA 改善方面无显著差异。

结论

双眼视差治疗后的 VA 和 SA 与遮盖治疗产生相似的治疗效果,提示在治疗儿童中度屈光不正性弱视时,双眼治疗具有潜在价值。

相似文献

1
A Prospective Trial to Assess the Efficacy of Eye-Tracking-Based Binocular Treatment versus Patching for Children's Amblyopia: A Pilot Study.一项评估基于眼动追踪的双眼治疗与遮盖治疗儿童弱视疗效的前瞻性试验:一项初步研究。
Semin Ophthalmol. 2023 Nov;38(8):761-767. doi: 10.1080/08820538.2023.2223275. Epub 2023 Jun 20.
2
An Eye-Tracking-Based Dichoptic Home Treatment for Amblyopia: A Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial.基于眼动追踪的弱视双眼分视家庭治疗:一项多中心随机临床试验
Ophthalmology. 2023 Mar;130(3):274-285. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2022.10.020. Epub 2022 Oct 26.
3
Effect of a Binocular iPad Game vs Part-time Patching in Children Aged 5 to 12 Years With Amblyopia: A Randomized Clinical Trial.双目iPad游戏与部分时间遮盖疗法对5至12岁弱视儿童的影响:一项随机临床试验
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2016 Dec 1;134(12):1391-1400. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2016.4262.
4
Binocular versus standard occlusion or blurring treatment for unilateral amblyopia in children aged three to eight years.双眼视刺激或常规遮盖治疗法治疗 3-8 岁儿童单眼弱视的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 7;2(2):CD011347. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011347.pub3.
5
Binocular game versus part-time patching for treatment of anisometropic amblyopia in Chinese children: a randomised clinical trial.双眼视刺激治疗与部分时间遮盖法治疗中国儿童屈光不正性弱视的随机临床试验。
Br J Ophthalmol. 2020 Mar;104(3):369-375. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2018-313815. Epub 2019 Jul 4.
6
Effectiveness of binocular therapy as a complementary treatment of part-time patching in older amblyopic children: a randomized clinical trial.双眼视疗法作为间歇性遮盖治疗大龄弱视儿童的补充疗法的有效性:一项随机临床试验。
Int Ophthalmol. 2023 Jul;43(7):2433-2445. doi: 10.1007/s10792-023-02642-0. Epub 2023 Mar 6.
7
A Randomized Trial of a Binocular iPad Game Versus Part-Time Patching in Children Aged 13 to 16 Years With Amblyopia.一项针对 13 至 16 岁弱视儿童的双眼 iPad 游戏与部分时间遮盖治疗的随机试验。
Am J Ophthalmol. 2018 Feb;186:104-115. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2017.11.017. Epub 2017 Nov 28.
8
Binocular iPad Game vs Patching for Treatment of Amblyopia in Children: A Randomized Clinical Trial.双目iPad游戏与眼罩治疗儿童弱视的随机临床试验
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2016 Dec 1;134(12):1402-1408. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2016.4224.
9
Comparison between over-glasses patching and adhesive patching for children with moderate amblyopia: a prospective randomized clinical trial.中度弱视儿童使用框架眼镜遮盖与粘贴式遮盖的比较:一项前瞻性随机临床试验。
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2018 Feb;256(2):429-437. doi: 10.1007/s00417-017-3851-2. Epub 2017 Dec 4.
10
Comparison of Dichoptic Therapy Versus Occlusion Therapy in Children With Anisometropic Amblyopia: A Prospective Randomized Study.双眼视刺激疗法与遮盖疗法治疗屈光不正性弱视儿童的比较:一项前瞻性随机研究。
J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 2023 May;60(3):210-217. doi: 10.3928/01913913-20220627-02. Epub 2022 Aug 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Efficacy of Dichoptic Treatment vs Eye Patching in Pediatric Patients with Amblyopia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.双眼分视治疗与眼罩遮盖治疗小儿弱视的疗效比较:随机对照试验的系统评价与Meta分析
Clin Ophthalmol. 2025 Jun 26;19:1999-2009. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S513329. eCollection 2025.
2
Transformative Gamified Binocular Therapy for Unilateral Amblyopia in Young Children: Pilot Prospective Efficacy and Safety Study.变革性游戏化双眼疗法治疗幼儿单侧弱视:前瞻性初步疗效与安全性研究
JMIR Serious Games. 2025 Jan 16;13:e63384. doi: 10.2196/63384.
3
Binocular treatment for amblyopia: a systematic review.
双眼治疗弱视:系统评价。
Int Ophthalmol. 2024 Sep 2;44(1):362. doi: 10.1007/s10792-024-03259-7.
4
Current Developments in the Management of Amblyopia with the Use of Perceptual Learning Techniques.当前使用知觉学习技术治疗弱视的进展。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 Dec 27;60(1):48. doi: 10.3390/medicina60010048.