• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

日本基于价值的药物定价的价值要素和方法:系统评价。

Value elements and methods of value-based pricing for drugs in Japan: a systematic review.

机构信息

Market Access, Public Affairs & Patient Experience, Japan Pharma Business Unit, Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited, Tokyo, Japan.

Department of Health Economics and Outcomes Research, Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2023 Jul-Dec;23(7):749-759. doi: 10.1080/14737167.2023.2223984. Epub 2023 Jun 20.

DOI:10.1080/14737167.2023.2223984
PMID:37339436
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Value-based pricing (VBP) can be a promising tool for optimizing drug prices. However, there is no consensus on the specific value elements and pricing method that should be used for VBP.

AREAS COVERED

We performed a systematic review and narrative synthesis to investigate the value elements and pricing method for VBP. The main inclusion criterion was that value elements, VBP method, and estimated prices for actual drugs were reported. We performed a search in MEDLINE and ICHUSHI Web. Eight articles met the selection criteria. Four studies adopted the cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) approach and the others used different approaches. The CEA approach included the value elements of productivity, value of hope, real option value, disease severity, insurance value in addition to costs and quality-adjusted life years. The other approaches used efficacy, toxicity, novelty, rarity, research and development costs, prognosis, population health burden, unmet needs, and effectiveness. Each study used individual methods to quantify these broader value elements.

EXPERT OPINION

Both conventional and broader value elements are used for VBP. To allow VBP to be widely applied to various diseases, a simple, versatile method is preferable. Further research is needed to establish VBP method which enables to incorporate broader values.

摘要

简介

基于价值的定价(VBP)可以成为优化药品价格的一种有前途的工具。然而,对于应该用于 VBP 的具体价值要素和定价方法,尚未达成共识。

涵盖领域

我们进行了系统评价和叙述性综合,以调查 VBP 的价值要素和定价方法。主要纳入标准是报告了价值要素、VBP 方法和实际药物的估计价格。我们在 MEDLINE 和 ICHUSHI Web 上进行了搜索。有 8 篇文章符合选择标准。四项研究采用了成本效益分析(CEA)方法,其他研究则采用了不同的方法。CEA 方法包括生产力、希望价值、实物期权价值、疾病严重程度、保险价值,以及成本和质量调整生命年。其他方法使用了疗效、毒性、新颖性、稀有性、研发成本、预后、人口健康负担、未满足的需求和有效性。每项研究都使用了单独的方法来量化这些更广泛的价值要素。

专家意见

传统和更广泛的价值要素都用于 VBP。为了使 VBP 能够广泛应用于各种疾病,最好使用简单、通用的方法。需要进一步研究来建立能够纳入更广泛价值的 VBP 方法。

相似文献

1
Value elements and methods of value-based pricing for drugs in Japan: a systematic review.日本基于价值的药物定价的价值要素和方法:系统评价。
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2023 Jul-Dec;23(7):749-759. doi: 10.1080/14737167.2023.2223984. Epub 2023 Jun 20.
2
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of topotecan for ovarian cancer.拓扑替康治疗卵巢癌的临床有效性和成本效益的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(28):1-110. doi: 10.3310/hta5280.
3
Surveillance of Barrett's oesophagus: exploring the uncertainty through systematic review, expert workshop and economic modelling.巴雷特食管的监测:通过系统评价、专家研讨会和经济模型探索不确定性
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Mar;10(8):1-142, iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta10080.
4
Topotecan, pegylated liposomal doxorubicin hydrochloride and paclitaxel for second-line or subsequent treatment of advanced ovarian cancer: a systematic review and economic evaluation.拓扑替康、聚乙二醇化脂质体盐酸多柔比星和紫杉醇用于晚期卵巢癌二线或后续治疗:一项系统评价和经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Mar;10(9):1-132. iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta10090.
5
Systemic treatments for metastatic cutaneous melanoma.转移性皮肤黑色素瘤的全身治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Feb 6;2(2):CD011123. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011123.pub2.
6
Cost-effectiveness of using prognostic information to select women with breast cancer for adjuvant systemic therapy.利用预后信息为乳腺癌患者选择辅助性全身治疗的成本效益
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Sep;10(34):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-204. doi: 10.3310/hta10340.
7
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine and vinorelbine in non-small-cell lung cancer.对紫杉醇、多西他赛、吉西他滨和长春瑞滨在非小细胞肺癌中的临床疗效和成本效益进行的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(32):1-195. doi: 10.3310/hta5320.
8
Systematic review and economic analysis of the comparative effectiveness of different inhaled corticosteroids and their usage with long-acting beta2 agonists for the treatment of chronic asthma in adults and children aged 12 years and over.不同吸入性糖皮质激素及其与长效β2受体激动剂联合使用治疗12岁及以上成人和儿童慢性哮喘比较效果的系统评价与经济学分析
Health Technol Assess. 2008 May;12(19):iii-iv, 1-360. doi: 10.3310/hta12190.
9
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
10
Comparison of the effectiveness of inhaler devices in asthma and chronic obstructive airways disease: a systematic review of the literature.吸入装置在哮喘和慢性阻塞性气道疾病中的有效性比较:文献系统评价
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(26):1-149. doi: 10.3310/hta5260.

引用本文的文献

1
Drivers of innovation value: simulation for new drug pricing evaluation based on system dynamics modelling.创新价值驱动因素:基于系统动力学建模的新药定价评估模拟
Front Pharmacol. 2025 Jan 22;16:1474856. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1474856. eCollection 2025.
2
What to Expect in 2024: Important Health Economics and Outcomes Research (HEOR) Trends.2024年展望:重要的卫生经济与结果研究(HEOR)趋势
Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2023 Dec 21;15:799-809. doi: 10.2147/CEOR.S453171. eCollection 2023.