• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

2 型糖尿病患者颈动脉介入治疗后的血糖控制与结局:一项瑞典全国队列研究。

Glycemic control and outcome after carotid intervention in patients with T2D: A Swedish nationwide cohort study.

机构信息

Department of Clinical Science and Education, Karolinska Institute, Södersjukhuset, Sweden.

Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden.

出版信息

Diab Vasc Dis Res. 2023 May-Jun;20(3):14791641231176767. doi: 10.1177/14791641231176767.

DOI:10.1177/14791641231176767
PMID:37340709
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10286178/
Abstract

AIMS

To investigate the association between glycemic control and outcome in people with type 2 diabetes (T2D) after carotid intervention due to carotid stenosis.

METHODS

Observational nationwide population-based cohort study using inverse probability treatment weighting (IPTW) and Cox regressions with covariates, that is, 4 stepwise models, investigating the relationship between terciles of glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels and stroke or death.

RESULTS

1115 subjects with T2D undergoing carotid intervention were included during Jan 1st 2009 to Dec 31st 2015. Divided into terciles, with a mean HbA1c level of 44 (tercile 1), 53 (tercile 2), and 72 (tercile 3) mmol/mol. By using IPTW and Cox regression, each model was stepwise introduced for the investigating of relative risks, that is, hazard ratios (HRs) with associated 95% confidence intervals (CI). There was a significant increased risk for stroke or death, in every model observed for tercile 3, compared to tercile 1: HR for model 4: 1.35 (95% CI 1.02-1.78). No difference for stroke or death within 30 days was observed between the groups.

CONCLUSION

Poor glycemic control in people with T2D after carotid intervention is associated with an increased long-term risk for stroke or death.

摘要

目的

探讨 2 型糖尿病(T2D)患者颈动脉狭窄行颈动脉介入治疗后血糖控制与结局的关系。

方法

采用逆概率治疗加权(IPTW)和协变量 Cox 回归(即 4 个逐步模型)进行观察性全国人群队列研究,探讨糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)水平三分位数与卒中或死亡之间的关系。

结果

2009 年 1 月 1 日至 2015 年 12 月 31 日期间,共纳入 1115 例 T2D 患者行颈动脉介入治疗。根据 HbA1c 水平分为三分位数,平均水平分别为 44(三分位数 1)、53(三分位数 2)和 72(三分位数 3)mmol/mol。采用 IPTW 和 Cox 回归,逐步引入每个模型,以研究相对风险,即风险比(HR)及其相关的 95%置信区间(CI)。与三分位数 1 相比,三分位数 3 的卒中或死亡风险在每个模型中均显著增加:模型 4 的 HR 为 1.35(95%CI 1.02-1.78)。两组间 30 天内卒中或死亡无差异。

结论

T2D 患者颈动脉介入治疗后血糖控制不佳与长期卒中或死亡风险增加相关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/49d5/10286178/844efc1f6ce2/10.1177_14791641231176767-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/49d5/10286178/b4196fddc50d/10.1177_14791641231176767-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/49d5/10286178/844efc1f6ce2/10.1177_14791641231176767-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/49d5/10286178/b4196fddc50d/10.1177_14791641231176767-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/49d5/10286178/844efc1f6ce2/10.1177_14791641231176767-fig2.jpg

相似文献

1
Glycemic control and outcome after carotid intervention in patients with T2D: A Swedish nationwide cohort study.2 型糖尿病患者颈动脉介入治疗后的血糖控制与结局:一项瑞典全国队列研究。
Diab Vasc Dis Res. 2023 May-Jun;20(3):14791641231176767. doi: 10.1177/14791641231176767.
2
Early and long-term prognosis in patients with and without type 2 diabetes after carotid intervention: a Swedish nationwide propensity score matched cohort study.颈动脉介入治疗后伴和不伴 2 型糖尿病患者的早期和长期预后:一项瑞典全国倾向评分匹配队列研究。
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2021 Apr 24;20(1):85. doi: 10.1186/s12933-021-01282-x.
3
Risk of first stroke in people with type 2 diabetes and its relation to glycaemic control: A nationwide observational study.2 型糖尿病患者首次中风的风险及其与血糖控制的关系:一项全国性观察研究。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2020 Feb;22(2):182-190. doi: 10.1111/dom.13885. Epub 2019 Oct 17.
4
Assessment of long-term survival and stroke after carotid endarterectomy and carotid stenting in patients older than 80 years.80 岁以上患者颈动脉内膜切除术和颈动脉支架置入术后的长期生存和卒中评估。
J Vasc Surg. 2019 Aug;70(2):522-529. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2018.10.121. Epub 2019 Mar 2.
5
Carotid artery stenting compared with endarterectomy in patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis (International Carotid Stenting Study): a randomised controlled trial with cost-effectiveness analysis.症状性颈动脉狭窄患者的颈动脉支架置入术与动脉内膜切除术比较(国际颈动脉支架置入研究):一项包含成本效益分析的随机对照试验
Health Technol Assess. 2016 Mar;20(20):1-94. doi: 10.3310/hta20200.
6
Presence of Contralateral Carotid Occlusion Is Associated With Increased Periprocedural Stroke Risk Following CEA but Not CAS: A Meta-analysis and Meta-regression Analysis of 43 Studies and 96,658 Patients.颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)后对侧颈动脉闭塞与围手术期卒中风险增加相关,但与颈动脉支架置入术(CAS)无关:43 项研究和 96658 例患者的荟萃分析和荟萃回归分析。
J Endovasc Ther. 2020 Apr;27(2):334-344. doi: 10.1177/1526602820904163. Epub 2020 Feb 18.
7
Secular Trends in Procedural Stroke or Death Risks of Stenting Versus Endarterectomy for Symptomatic Carotid Stenosis.症状性颈动脉狭窄支架置入术与内膜切除术的操作相关卒中或死亡风险的长期变化趋势。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Aug;12(8):e007870. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.119.007870. Epub 2019 Aug 5.
8
Estimated glucose disposal rate and risk of stroke and mortality in type 2 diabetes: a nationwide cohort study.估算 2 型糖尿病患者的葡萄糖处置率与卒中及死亡率风险:一项全国性队列研究。
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2021 Oct 6;20(1):202. doi: 10.1186/s12933-021-01394-4.
9
Propensity score-matched analysis of 1-year outcomes of transcarotid revascularization with dynamic flow reversal, carotid endarterectomy, and transfemoral carotid artery stenting.经颈动脉血管重建术(动态血流逆转)、颈动脉内膜切除术和经股动脉颈动脉支架置入术1年结局的倾向评分匹配分析。
J Vasc Surg. 2022 Jan;75(1):213-222.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2021.07.242. Epub 2021 Sep 6.
10
Endarterectomy achieves lower stroke and death rates compared with stenting in patients with asymptomatic carotid stenosis.对于无症状性颈动脉狭窄患者,与支架置入术相比,动脉内膜切除术可降低中风和死亡率。
J Vasc Surg. 2017 Aug;66(2):607-617. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2017.04.053.

本文引用的文献

1
Management of Hyperglycemia in Type 2 Diabetes, 2022. A Consensus Report by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD).2022 年美国糖尿病协会 (ADA) 和欧洲糖尿病研究协会 (EASD) 共识报告:2 型糖尿病患者高血糖管理。
Diabetes Care. 2022 Nov 1;45(11):2753-2786. doi: 10.2337/dci22-0034.
2
Risk factors for mortality within 5 years of carotid endarterectomy for asymptomatic stenosis.无症状性狭窄颈动脉内膜切除术 5 年内死亡的风险因素。
J Vasc Surg. 2022 Jun;75(6):1945-1957. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2022.01.020. Epub 2022 Jan 25.
3
New guidance on the perioperative management of diabetes.
围手术期糖尿病管理新指南。
Clin Med (Lond). 2022 Jan;22(1):41-44. doi: 10.7861/clinmed.2021-0355. Epub 2021 Dec 17.
4
Global, regional, and national burden of stroke and its risk factors, 1990-2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019.1990—2019年全球、区域和国家的卒中负担及其风险因素:全球疾病负担研究2019的系统分析
Lancet Neurol. 2021 Oct;20(10):795-820. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(21)00252-0. Epub 2021 Sep 3.
5
Pre-operative glycaemic control and long-term survival in diabetic patients after coronary artery bypass grafting.冠状动脉旁路移植术后糖尿病患者的术前血糖控制与长期生存。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2021 Nov 2;60(5):1169-1177. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezab180.
6
Early and long-term prognosis in patients with and without type 2 diabetes after carotid intervention: a Swedish nationwide propensity score matched cohort study.颈动脉介入治疗后伴和不伴 2 型糖尿病患者的早期和长期预后:一项瑞典全国倾向评分匹配队列研究。
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2021 Apr 24;20(1):85. doi: 10.1186/s12933-021-01282-x.
7
Recovery from stroke: current concepts and future perspectives.中风康复:当前概念与未来展望。
Neurol Res Pract. 2020 Jun 16;2:17. doi: 10.1186/s42466-020-00060-6. eCollection 2020.
8
Carotid endarterectomy for symptomatic carotid stenosis.有症状颈动脉狭窄的颈动脉内膜切除术
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Sep 12;9(9):CD001081. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001081.pub4.
9
The impact of hemoglobin A on outcomes after lower extremity bypass.血红蛋白 A 对下肢旁路手术后结局的影响。
J Vasc Surg. 2021 Apr;73(4):1332-1339.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2020.05.036. Epub 2020 Jul 28.
10
Influence of preprocedural glycemic control on clinical outcomes of endovascular therapy in diabetic patients with lower extremity artery disease: an analysis from a Korean multicenter retrospective registry cohort.术前血糖控制对下肢动脉疾病糖尿病患者血管内治疗临床结局的影响:来自韩国多中心回顾性登记队列的分析。
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2020 Jun 22;19(1):97. doi: 10.1186/s12933-020-01072-x.