• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估美国皮肤病学会儿科特应性皮炎的诊断标准并将其修改为勾选框形式:一项横断面研究。

Assessment of the American Academy of Dermatology diagnostic criteria for pediatric atopic dermatitis and modification into a checkbox form: A cross-sectional study.

机构信息

Department of Dermatology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.

Division of Dermatology and Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel.

出版信息

Pediatr Dermatol. 2023 Sep-Oct;40(5):809-815. doi: 10.1111/pde.15338. Epub 2023 Jun 21.

DOI:10.1111/pde.15338
PMID:37341972
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10627234/
Abstract

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Diagnostic criteria for atopic dermatitis (AD) are limited in their performance and/or usability. The American Academy of Dermatology (AAD) consensus criteria include hierarchical categories of disease features to improve these metrics but have not been validated. Our objective was to create and validate a checkbox form of the AAD consensus criteria in the pediatric population.

METHODS

We performed a cross-sectional study of 100 pediatric patients with AD (n = 58) and diseases in the differential diagnosis of AD (n = 42).

RESULTS

Having three or more "Essential," ≥2 "Important," ≥1 "Associated" features of the AAD criteria was optimal for the diagnosis of AD in children. This combination was 91.4% (95% CI, 84.2%-98.6%) sensitive and 95.2% (88.8%-100%) specific. The UK working party criteria and the Hanifin-Rajka criteria had sensitivities of 96.6% (95% CI 91.9%-100%) and 98.3% (95% CI 94.9%-100%) and specificities of 83.3% (95% CI 72.1%-94.6%) and 71.4% (95% CI 57.8%-85.1%), respectively. The AAD criteria had significantly greater specificity than the Hanifin-Rajka criteria (p = .002).

CONCLUSIONS

This study represents an important step in validating the AAD consensus criteria and formulating a useable checkbox form for diagnosing AD in the pediatric population.

摘要

背景/目的:特应性皮炎(AD)的诊断标准在性能和/或可用性方面存在局限性。美国皮肤病学会(AAD)共识标准包括疾病特征的分层类别,以提高这些指标的准确性,但尚未得到验证。我们的目标是为儿科人群创建和验证 AAD 共识标准的复选框形式。

方法

我们对 100 名患有 AD(n=58)和 AD 鉴别诊断疾病的儿科患者(n=42)进行了横断面研究。

结果

具有 AAD 标准的三个或更多“必需”、≥2“重要”、≥1“相关”特征是儿童 AD 诊断的最佳选择。这种组合的敏感性为 91.4%(95%CI,84.2%-98.6%),特异性为 95.2%(88.8%-100%)。英国工作组标准和 Hanifin-Rajka 标准的敏感性分别为 96.6%(95%CI 91.9%-100%)和 98.3%(95%CI 94.9%-100%),特异性分别为 83.3%(95%CI 72.1%-94.6%)和 71.4%(95%CI 57.8%-85.1%)。AAD 标准的特异性明显高于 Hanifin-Rajka 标准(p=0.002)。

结论

这项研究是验证 AAD 共识标准并为儿科人群制定 AD 诊断的可用复选框形式的重要一步。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e8d9/10627234/66d56acf7ea4/nihms-1902305-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e8d9/10627234/f3db91ce4d0e/nihms-1902305-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e8d9/10627234/66d56acf7ea4/nihms-1902305-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e8d9/10627234/f3db91ce4d0e/nihms-1902305-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e8d9/10627234/66d56acf7ea4/nihms-1902305-f0002.jpg

相似文献

1
Assessment of the American Academy of Dermatology diagnostic criteria for pediatric atopic dermatitis and modification into a checkbox form: A cross-sectional study.评估美国皮肤病学会儿科特应性皮炎的诊断标准并将其修改为勾选框形式:一项横断面研究。
Pediatr Dermatol. 2023 Sep-Oct;40(5):809-815. doi: 10.1111/pde.15338. Epub 2023 Jun 21.
2
Diagnosis of atopic dermatitis in children: comparison of the Hanifin-Rajka and the United Kingdom Working Party criteria.儿童特应性皮炎的诊断:Hanifin-Rajka标准与英国工作组标准的比较。
Allergol Immunopathol (Madr). 2020 Mar-Apr;48(2):175-181. doi: 10.1016/j.aller.2019.07.008. Epub 2019 Oct 11.
3
A Cross-Sectional Evaluation of the Usefulness of the Minor Features of Hanifin and Rajka Diagnostic Criteria for the Diagnosis of Atopic Dermatitis in the Pediatric Population.Hanifin和Rajka诊断标准的次要特征对儿科人群特应性皮炎诊断的实用性横断面评估。
Indian J Dermatol. 2021 Nov-Dec;66(6):583-590. doi: 10.4103/ijd.ijd_1046_20.
4
Systematic Review of Diagnostic Criteria Used in Atopic Dermatitis Randomized Controlled Trials.特应性皮炎随机对照试验中使用的诊断标准的系统评价。
Am J Clin Dermatol. 2018 Feb;19(1):15-22. doi: 10.1007/s40257-017-0299-4.
5
Genetic, Clinical, and Environmental Factors Associated With Persistent Atopic Dermatitis in Childhood.遗传、临床和环境因素与儿童持续性特应性皮炎相关。
JAMA Dermatol. 2019 Jan 1;155(1):50-57. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2018.4061.
6
Variation in clinical presentation of pediatric-onset and adult-onset atopic dermatitis: a retrospective, single-center, chart review of adults with atopic dermatitis from the United States.特应性皮炎患儿期和成人期临床表现的差异:美国一项回顾性、单中心、特应性皮炎患者图表回顾的研究。
Arch Dermatol Res. 2024 Jun 15;316(7):409. doi: 10.1007/s00403-024-03008-x.
7
A Cross-Sectional Study Comparing Application of Hanifin and Rajka Criteria in Indian Pediatric Atopic Dermatitis Patients to that of Other Countries.一项比较Hanifin和Rajka标准在印度儿童特应性皮炎患者中的应用与其他国家情况的横断面研究。
Indian Dermatol Online J. 2022 Dec 29;14(1):32-37. doi: 10.4103/idoj.idoj_192_22. eCollection 2023 Jan-Feb.
8
Defining and Measuring the Scope of Atopic Dermatitis.定义和测量特应性皮炎的范围。
Adv Exp Med Biol. 2024;1447:105-116. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-54513-9_10.
9
A comparison of criteria for diagnosis of atopic dermatitis in children.儿童特应性皮炎诊断标准的比较。
World J Pediatr. 2012 Nov;8(4):355-8. doi: 10.1007/s12519-012-0381-1. Epub 2012 Nov 15.
10
[Epidemiological study on atopic dermatitis in Mexico].[墨西哥特应性皮炎的流行病学研究]
Rev Alerg Mex. 2019 Apr-Jun;66(2):192-204. doi: 10.29262/ram.v66i2.591.

本文引用的文献

1
Inpatient Financial Burden of Atopic Dermatitis in the United States.美国特应性皮炎的住院患者经济负担
J Invest Dermatol. 2017 Jul;137(7):1461-1467. doi: 10.1016/j.jid.2017.02.975. Epub 2017 Mar 1.
2
STARD 2015 guidelines for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies: explanation and elaboration.《STARD 2015诊断准确性研究报告指南:解释与详述》
BMJ Open. 2016 Nov 14;6(11):e012799. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012799.
3
Guidelines of care for the management of atopic dermatitis: section 1. Diagnosis and assessment of atopic dermatitis.
特应性皮炎管理指南:第 1 节。特应性皮炎的诊断和评估。
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2014 Feb;70(2):338-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2013.10.010. Epub 2013 Nov 27.
4
Association between severe eczema in children and multiple comorbid conditions and increased healthcare utilization.儿童重度湿疹与多种合并症的关系及增加医疗保健利用。
Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2013 Aug;24(5):476-86. doi: 10.1111/pai.12095. Epub 2013 Jun 16.
5
Atopic dermatitis in African American children: addressing unmet needs of a common disease.非裔美国儿童的特应性皮炎:满足一种常见疾病未被满足的需求
Pediatr Dermatol. 2012 Jul-Aug;29(4):395-402. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1470.2012.01740.x. Epub 2012 Apr 4.
6
Evaluation of diagnostic tests for infectious diseases: general principles.传染病诊断检测的评估:一般原则
Nat Rev Microbiol. 2010 Dec;8(12 Suppl):S17-29.
7
Global variations in prevalence of eczema symptoms in children from ISAAC Phase Three.ISAAC 三期研究中儿童特应性皮炎症状的全球流行率变化。
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2009 Dec;124(6):1251-8.e23. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2009.10.009.
8
Diagnostic criteria for atopic dermatitis: a systematic review.特应性皮炎的诊断标准:一项系统综述
Br J Dermatol. 2008 Apr;158(4):754-65. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2007.08412.x. Epub 2008 Jan 30.
9
Small proportions: what to report for confidence intervals?小比例数据:置信区间应报告什么?
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2005 Apr;14(4):239-47. doi: 10.1002/pds.1081.
10
Consensus guidelines in diagnosis and treatment of atopic dermatitis.特应性皮炎诊断和治疗的共识指南。
Allergy. 2004 Aug;59 Suppl 78:86-92. doi: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2004.00569.x.