Centre of Precision Rehabilitation for Spinal Pain (CPR Spine), School of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, College of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Birmingham, UK; Physical Therapy Department, College of Applied Medical Science, Taif University, Taif, Saudi Arabia.
Centre of Precision Rehabilitation for Spinal Pain (CPR Spine), School of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, College of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Birmingham, UK.
Musculoskelet Sci Pract. 2023 Aug;66:102799. doi: 10.1016/j.msksp.2023.102799. Epub 2023 Jun 10.
Evaluating trunk strength is an important aspect of the physical examination of people with low back pain (LBP). Thus, reliable, valid, and easily applied measurement tools are needed to quantify trunk muscle strength and monitor changes in response to interventions.
To determine within-day and between-day test re-test reliability and criterion validity of a handheld dynamometer (HHD) to evaluate maximum isometric trunk strength in people with chronic LBP and asymptomatic individuals.
Reliability and criterion validity study.
Twenty adult participants with chronic, non-specific LBP and 35 asymptomatic individuals participated. Isometric trunk flexion, extension, and rotation strength were evaluated with the HHD (Active force 2) and the within-day and between-day reliability were determined with intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and the standard error of the measurements (SEM), minimal detectable change (MDC), and the limits of agreement (LOA) using Bland-Altman plots. Criterion validity was evaluated using Pearson correlation coefficients to compare HHD measurements to isokinetic dynamometry for both isometric trunk flexion and extension strength.
Good to excellent within-day and between-day reliability was observed for people with LBP and asymptomatic individuals with (ICC) of 0.73-0.93 and 0.62-0.92 respectively. A moderate to strong correlation was found between measurements with the HHD and the isokinetic dynamometer with a correlation of r = 0.68-0.78 and r = 0.56-0.59 for people with LBP and asymptomatic participants respectively.
A HHD is a reliable, valid, and clinically applicable tool for the measurement of trunk strength in adults with and without chronic LBP.
评估躯干力量是腰痛(LBP)患者体格检查的重要方面。因此,需要可靠、有效且易于应用的测量工具来量化躯干肌肉力量,并监测干预措施后的变化。
确定手持式测力计(HHD)评估慢性 LBP 患者和无症状个体最大等长躯干力量的日内和日间测试重测可靠性和标准效度。
可靠性和标准效度研究。
20 名患有慢性、非特异性 LBP 的成年参与者和 35 名无症状个体参加了这项研究。使用 HHD(Active force 2)评估等长躯干屈伸和旋转力量,通过组内相关系数(ICC)和测量标准误差(SEM)、最小可检测变化(MDC)和 Bland-Altman 图的协议界限确定日内和日间可靠性,使用 Bland-Altman 图评估可靠性。使用 Pearson 相关系数评估标准效度,以比较 HHD 测量值与等速测力法在等长躯干屈伸强度方面的相关性。
LBP 患者和无症状个体的日内和日间可靠性良好至优秀(ICC)分别为 0.73-0.93 和 0.62-0.92。使用 HHD 进行的测量与等速测力法之间存在中度至强相关性,LBP 患者和无症状参与者的相关性分别为 r = 0.68-0.78 和 r = 0.56-0.59。
HHD 是一种可靠、有效且临床适用的工具,可用于测量患有和不患有慢性 LBP 的成年人的躯干力量。