Althobaiti Shouq, Deane Janet A, Falla Deborah
Centre of Precision Rehabilitation for Spinal Pain (CPR Spine), School of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, College of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.
Physical Therapy Department, College of Applied Medical Science, Taif University, Taif, Saudi Arabia.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2025 Jan 18;26(1):66. doi: 10.1186/s12891-025-08325-4.
To assess the responsiveness of a hand-held dynamometer (HHD) in evaluating changes in trunk isometric strength in people with chronic low back pain (LBP).
Reduced trunk muscle strength has been associated with pain incidence and severity in people with chronic LBP. Trunk muscle strength is an important functional outcome that is measured in clinical practice and research. However, the responsiveness of clinical tools such as HHD for measuring changes in trunk muscle strength remains underexplored.
Maximum isometric trunk strength was measured using both a HHD and an isokinetic dynamometer (ID) in 21 participants with chronic LBP both before and after 6 weeks of progressive trunk resistance exercises. Effect sizes (ES) and standardised response mean (SRM) were used to evaluate the internal responsiveness of the HHD measures. External responsiveness was determined by correlating the change scores measured with the HHD with those obtained using the ID.
Following the progressive resistance exercise programme, there was a significant improvement in trunk muscle strength measured with the HHD with moderate to large ES (0.40-0.85) and SRM (0.60- 0.74), indicating moderate to high internal responsiveness. Pearson's correlations revealed a weak correlation between changes in trunk strength measured with the HHD and those measured with the ID (r = 0.22- 0.26), indicating inadequate external responsiveness.
Although the use of a HHD was shown to have internal responsiveness for detecting changes in trunk muscle strength, the inadequate external responsiveness warrants further investigation. Future research should also explore the responsiveness of HHD in people with chronic LBP with higher pain and disability levels using comparable measurement setups.
评估手持测力计(HHD)在评估慢性下腰痛(LBP)患者躯干等长肌力变化中的反应性。
躯干肌肉力量下降与慢性LBP患者的疼痛发生率和严重程度相关。躯干肌肉力量是临床实践和研究中测量的一项重要功能指标。然而,诸如HHD等临床工具在测量躯干肌肉力量变化方面的反应性仍未得到充分研究。
在21名慢性LBP患者进行为期6周的渐进性躯干抗阻训练前后,使用HHD和等速测力计(ID)测量最大等长躯干力量。效应大小(ES)和标准化反应均值(SRM)用于评估HHD测量的内部反应性。通过将HHD测量的变化分数与ID获得的变化分数进行相关性分析来确定外部反应性。
在进行渐进性抗阻训练计划后,用HHD测量的躯干肌肉力量有显著改善,ES为中度至重度(0.40 - 0.85),SRM为(0.60 - 0.74),表明内部反应性为中度至高。Pearson相关性分析显示,HHD测量的躯干力量变化与ID测量的变化之间存在弱相关性(r = 0.22 - 0.26),表明外部反应性不足。
尽管使用HHD显示出在检测躯干肌肉力量变化方面具有内部反应性,但外部反应性不足值得进一步研究。未来的研究还应使用可比的测量设置,探索HHD在疼痛和残疾程度较高的慢性LBP患者中的反应性。