Department of Physical Activity and Sport, Faculty of Sport Sciences, University of Murcia, 30720 Murcia, Spain.
Department of Sports Dietetics, Poznan University of Physical Education, 61-871 Poznan, Poland.
Sensors (Basel). 2024 Jun 25;24(13):4131. doi: 10.3390/s24134131.
Exercise is a front-line intervention to increase functional capacity and reduce pain and disability in people with low strength levels or disorders. However, there is a lack of validated field-based tests to check the initial status and, more importantly, to control the process and make tailored adjustments in load, intensity, and recovery. We aimed to determine the test-retest reliability of a submaximal, resistance-band test to evaluate the strength of the trunk stability muscles using a portable force sensor in middle-aged adults (48 ± 13 years) with medically diagnosed chronic low back pain and healthy peers ( = 35). Participants completed two submaximal progressive tests of two resistance-band exercises (unilateral row and Pallof press), consisting of 5 s maintained contraction, progressively increasing the load. The test stopped when deviation from the initial position by compensation movements occurred. Trunk muscle strength (CORE muscles) was monitored in real time using a portable force sensor (strain gauge). Results revealed that both tests were highly reliable (intra-class correlation [ICC] > 0.901) and presented low errors and coefficients of variation (CV) in both groups. In particular, people with low back pain had errors of 14-19 N (CV = 9-12%) in the unilateral row test and 13-19 N (CV = 8-12%) in the Pallof press. No discomfort or pain was reported during or after the tests. These two easy-to-use and technology-based tests result in a reliable and objective screening tool to evaluate the strength and trunk stability in middle-aged adults with chronic low back pain, considering an error of measurement < 20 N. This contribution may have an impact on improving the individualization and control of rehabilitation or physical training in people with lumbar injuries or disorders.
运动是增强低体力水平或功能障碍人群的功能能力,减轻疼痛和残疾的一线干预措施。然而,目前缺乏经过验证的现场测试来检查初始状态,更重要的是,无法控制过程并针对负荷、强度和恢复进行定制调整。我们旨在确定使用便携式力传感器评估中年成年人(48 ± 13 岁)躯干稳定性肌肉力量的亚最大阻力带测试的重测信度,这些成年人患有医学诊断的慢性下腰痛和健康同龄人(= 35)。参与者完成了两种阻力带运动(单侧划船和帕洛夫按压)的两次亚最大渐进测试,每个运动均由 5 秒的维持收缩组成,逐渐增加负荷。当出现补偿运动导致偏离初始位置时,测试停止。使用便携式力传感器(应变计)实时监测躯干肌肉力量(CORE 肌肉)。结果表明,两种测试的可靠性都很高(组内相关系数 [ICC] > 0.901),两组的误差和变异系数(CV)均较低。特别是腰痛患者在单侧划船测试中的误差为 14-19 N(CV = 9-12%),在帕洛夫按压测试中的误差为 13-19 N(CV = 8-12%)。在测试过程中和测试后,没有报告不适或疼痛。这两种易于使用且基于技术的测试提供了一种可靠且客观的筛选工具,可用于评估患有慢性下腰痛的中年成年人的力量和躯干稳定性,考虑到测量误差 < 20 N。这一贡献可能会对改善腰部受伤或功能障碍人群的康复或体育训练的个体化和控制产生影响。