• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医学协会的作用以及临床视角在不断发展的欧盟卫生技术评估过程中的相关性:在2023年秋季大会及欧洲准入学会调查中获得的见解

The Role of Medical Societies and the Relevance of Clinical Perspective in the Evolving EU HTA Process: Insights Generated at the 2023 Fall Convention and Survey of the European Access Academy.

作者信息

Julian Elaine, Solà-Morales Oriol, Garcia Maria João, Brinkhuis Francine, Pavlovic Mira, Martín-Saborido Carlos, Doeswijk Robin, Giuliani Rosa, Willemsen Anne, Goettsch Wim, Wörmann Bernhard, Dafni Urania, Bucher Heiner C, Pérez-Valderrama Begoña, Bernardini Renato, Gianfrate Fabrizio, Uyl-de Groot Carin A, Ruof Jörg

机构信息

Secretariat of the European Access Academy (EAA), 4059 Basel, Switzerland.

HiTT Foundation, International University of Catalonia-UIC, 08015 Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

J Mark Access Health Policy. 2024 Jun 22;12(3):128-143. doi: 10.3390/jmahp12030011. eCollection 2024 Sep.

DOI:10.3390/jmahp12030011
PMID:39072306
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11270181/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

This work aimed to determine the role and action points for the involvement of medical societies in the European Health Technology Assessment (EU HTA) Methods: An online pre-convention survey was developed addressing four areas related to the EU HTA: (i) medical societies' role; (ii) role of clinical guidelines; (iii) interface with the European Society for Medical Oncology Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale (ESMO-MCBS); and (iv) approaching 'best-available evidence' (BAE). A descriptive analysis of questionnaire outcomes was conducted to inform the European Access Academy (EAA) Fall Convention 2023. Within the working groups (WGs), action points were identified and prioritised.

RESULTS

A total of 57 experts from 15 countries responded to the survey. The WGs were attended by (i) 11, (ii) 10, (iii) 12, and (iv) 12 experts, respectively, representing a variety of national backgrounds and stakeholder profiles. The most relevant action points identified were as follows: (i) incorporation of clinical context into population, intervention, comparator, outcomes (PICO) schemes, (ii) timely provision of up-to-date therapeutic guidelines, (iii) ensuring the inclusion of MCBS insights into the EU HTA process, and (iv) considering randomized controlled trials (RCTs) as the gold standard and leveraging regulatory insights if development programs only include single-arm trials.

CONCLUSIONS

The involvement of medical societies is a critical success factor for the EU HTA. The identified key action points foster the involvement of patient associations and medical societies.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在确定医学协会在欧洲卫生技术评估(EU HTA)中的作用及行动要点。方法:开展了一项会前在线调查,涉及与EU HTA相关的四个领域:(i)医学协会的作用;(ii)临床指南的作用;(iii)与欧洲医学肿瘤学会临床获益量表(ESMO-MCBS)的衔接;(iv)获取“最佳可得证据”(BAE)。对问卷结果进行了描述性分析,以为2023年欧洲准入学会(EAA)秋季会议提供信息。在各工作组(WG)中,确定并优先排列了行动要点。

结果

来自15个国家的57名专家回复了调查。各工作组分别有(i)11名、(ii)10名、(iii)12名和(iv)12名专家参加,他们代表了不同的国家背景和利益相关者概况。确定的最相关行动要点如下:(i)将临床背景纳入人群、干预措施、对照、结局(PICO)方案;(ii)及时提供最新的治疗指南;(iii)确保将MCBS的见解纳入EU HTA流程;(iv)将随机对照试验(RCT)视为金标准,若开发项目仅包括单臂试验,则利用监管见解。

结论

医学协会的参与是EU HTA取得成功的关键因素。确定的关键行动要点促进了患者协会和医学协会的参与。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b79/11270181/9b83072d04bd/jmahp-12-00011-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b79/11270181/01a379c4c43f/jmahp-12-00011-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b79/11270181/c88a143c4d09/jmahp-12-00011-g002a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b79/11270181/196eb4ce2764/jmahp-12-00011-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b79/11270181/9b83072d04bd/jmahp-12-00011-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b79/11270181/01a379c4c43f/jmahp-12-00011-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b79/11270181/c88a143c4d09/jmahp-12-00011-g002a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b79/11270181/196eb4ce2764/jmahp-12-00011-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b79/11270181/9b83072d04bd/jmahp-12-00011-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
The Role of Medical Societies and the Relevance of Clinical Perspective in the Evolving EU HTA Process: Insights Generated at the 2023 Fall Convention and Survey of the European Access Academy.医学协会的作用以及临床视角在不断发展的欧盟卫生技术评估过程中的相关性:在2023年秋季大会及欧洲准入学会调查中获得的见解
J Mark Access Health Policy. 2024 Jun 22;12(3):128-143. doi: 10.3390/jmahp12030011. eCollection 2024 Sep.
2
Shaping a research agenda to ensure a successful European health technology assessment: insights generated during the inaugural convention of the European access academy.制定一项研究议程以确保欧洲卫生技术评估取得成功:欧洲准入学会首届大会期间产生的见解
Health Econ Rev. 2022 Nov 5;12(1):54. doi: 10.1186/s13561-022-00402-x.
3
Navigating the path towards successful implementation of the EU HTA Regulation: key takeaways from the 2023 Spring Convention of the European Access Academy.探索成功实施欧盟 HTA 法规的路径:2023 年欧洲准入学院春季大会的主要收获。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2024 Jul 2;22(1):74. doi: 10.1186/s12961-024-01154-2.
4
An Inclusive Civil Society Dialogue for Successful Implementation of the EU HTA Regulation: Call to Action to Ensure Appropriate Involvement of Stakeholders and Collaborators.为成功实施欧盟卫生技术评估法规开展包容性公民社会对话:呼吁采取行动确保利益相关者和合作伙伴的适当参与。
J Mark Access Health Policy. 2024 Mar 14;12(1):21-34. doi: 10.3390/jmahp12010004. eCollection 2024 Mar.
5
How can a joint European health technology assessment provide an 'additional benefit' over the current standard of national assessments? : Insights generated from a multi-stakeholder survey in hematology/oncology.相较于当前各国的评估标准,欧洲联合卫生技术评估如何能带来“额外益处”?:血液学/肿瘤学多利益相关方调查得出的见解
Health Econ Rev. 2022 Jun 2;12(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s13561-022-00379-7.
6
The role of stakeholder involvement in the evolving EU HTA process: .利益相关者参与在不断发展的欧盟卫生技术评估过程中的作用:
J Mark Access Health Policy. 2023 Jun 4;11(1):2217543. doi: 10.1080/20016689.2023.2217543. eCollection 2023.
7
Health technology assessment of medical devices: What is different? An overview of three European projects.医疗设备的卫生技术评估:有何不同?三个欧洲项目概述。
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2015;109(4-5):309-18. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2015.06.011. Epub 2015 Jul 26.
8
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
9
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
10
Implementing the EU HTA regulation: Insights from semi-structured interviews on patient expectations, Belgian and European institutional perspectives, and industry outlooks.实施欧盟卫生技术评估法规:关于患者期望、比利时和欧洲机构观点以及行业展望的半结构化访谈见解
Front Pharmacol. 2024 Apr 10;15:1369508. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1369508. eCollection 2024.

引用本文的文献

1
Enhancing Patient Engagement in HTA: Using Consensus Research to Overcome PICO Scoping Challenges Under the EU HTAR.提高患者在卫生技术评估中的参与度:利用共识研究克服欧盟卫生技术评估法规下的PICO范围界定挑战
J Mark Access Health Policy. 2025 Jun 2;13(2):27. doi: 10.3390/jmahp13020027. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
Avoiding Error and Finding the Right Balance in European Health Technology Assessments: Insights Generated by the European Access Academy.在欧洲卫生技术评估中避免错误并找到正确平衡:欧洲准入学院产生的见解
J Mark Access Health Policy. 2025 Feb 10;13(1):6. doi: 10.3390/jmahp13010006. eCollection 2025 Mar.

本文引用的文献

1
AGO Recommendations for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Patients with Locally Advanced and Metastatic Breast Cancer: Update 2023.AGO关于局部晚期和转移性乳腺癌患者诊断与治疗的建议:2023年更新版
Breast Care (Basel). 2023 Aug;18(4):306-315. doi: 10.1159/000531579. Epub 2023 Jun 16.
2
2023 Focused Update of the 2021 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure.《2021年欧洲心脏病学会急性和慢性心力衰竭诊断与治疗指南》2023年聚焦更新
Eur Heart J. 2023 Oct 1;44(37):3627-3639. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehad195.
3
2023 ESC Guidelines for the management of cardiomyopathies.
2023年欧洲心脏病学会心肌病管理指南。
Eur Heart J. 2023 Oct 1;44(37):3503-3626. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehad194.
4
2023 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes.2023年欧洲心脏病学会急性冠状动脉综合征管理指南。
Eur Heart J. 2023 Oct 12;44(38):3720-3826. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehad191.
5
ESMO-Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale for haematological malignancies (ESMO-MCBS:H) version 1.0.ESMO 血液系统恶性肿瘤临床获益量表(ESMO-MCBS:H)版本 1.0。
Ann Oncol. 2023 Sep;34(9):734-771. doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2023.06.002. Epub 2023 Jun 19.
6
SEOM-GEICAM-SOLTI clinical guidelines for early-stage breast cancer (2022).SEOM-GEICAM-SOLTI 临床指南:早期乳腺癌(2022 年)。
Clin Transl Oncol. 2023 Sep;25(9):2647-2664. doi: 10.1007/s12094-023-03215-4. Epub 2023 Jun 16.
7
The role of stakeholder involvement in the evolving EU HTA process: .利益相关者参与在不断发展的欧盟卫生技术评估过程中的作用:
J Mark Access Health Policy. 2023 Jun 4;11(1):2217543. doi: 10.1080/20016689.2023.2217543. eCollection 2023.
8
Improving prioritization processes for clinical practice guidelines: new methods and an evaluation from the National Heart Foundation of Australia.改善临床实践指南的优先级制定流程:来自澳大利亚国家心脏基金会的新方法和评估。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2023 Apr 5;21(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s12961-022-00953-9.
9
Shaping a research agenda to ensure a successful European health technology assessment: insights generated during the inaugural convention of the European access academy.制定一项研究议程以确保欧洲卫生技术评估取得成功:欧洲准入学会首届大会期间产生的见解
Health Econ Rev. 2022 Nov 5;12(1):54. doi: 10.1186/s13561-022-00402-x.
10
Management of toxicities from immunotherapy: ESMO Clinical Practice Guideline for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up.免疫疗法毒性的管理:ESMO诊断、治疗及随访临床实践指南
Ann Oncol. 2022 Dec;33(12):1217-1238. doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2022.10.001. Epub 2022 Oct 18.